Sign in
Search 68hc12
Subscribe to 68hc12
68hc12 by Keywords
68HC1 | 812A4 | 9S12DP256 | Bootloader | CodeWarrior | D60A | Debugger | DP256 | ECT | EEPROM | EVB | Flash | HC1 | HCS12 | I2C | IAR | ICC1 | Interrupts | LCD | M68KIT912DP256 | MC9S12DP256 | MC9S12DP256B | Metrowerks | Motor | MSCAN | Multilink | PLL | Quadrature | SDI | SPI | Transceiver | XFC
Ads
Discussion Groups
See Also
Discussion Groups | 68HC12 | Update true-time debugger
Join our technical discussions about Freescale Microcontrollers: M68HC12. (Freescale Semiconductor is a Subsidiary of Motorola).
Update true-time debugger - pascal_derex - Oct 1 11:07:00 2005
Hi,
I'm workin' a MC9S12DT128 on my testcard with Code Warrior true-time
debugger and a P&E USB-ML-12 rev A multilink and the derivative to
select for is non present in the debugger. So I'm using for the moment
the MC9S12DT128B derivative...
Is it correct or could that cause some errors in the debugging?
And could I update my true-time debugger or my multilink to adapt the
debugging to a MC9S12DT128?
Regards.
(You need to be a member of 68hc12 -- send a blank email to 68hc12-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
I'm workin' a MC9S12DT128 on my testcard with Code Warrior true-time
debugger and a P&E USB-ML-12 rev A multilink and the derivative to
select for is non present in the debugger. So I'm using for the moment
the MC9S12DT128B derivative...
Is it correct or could that cause some errors in the debugging?
And could I update my true-time debugger or my multilink to adapt the
debugging to a MC9S12DT128?
Regards.
(You need to be a member of 68hc12 -- send a blank email to 68hc12-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Update true-time debugger - Gilles Blanquin - Oct 12 3:30:00 2005
Hi Pascal.
This is ok for programming/debugging.
However, I will check internally about this discrepancy. MC9S12DT128 and
MC9S12DT128B are different silicon masks and the MC9S12DT128 is definitely
missing in selections.
Regards,
Gilles
>Hi,
>
>I'm workin' a MC9S12DT128 on my testcard with Code Warrior true-time
>debugger and a P&E USB-ML-12 rev A multilink and the derivative to
>select for is non present in the debugger. So I'm using for the moment
>the MC9S12DT128B derivative...
>Is it correct or could that cause some errors in the debugging?
>And could I update my true-time debugger or my multilink to adapt the
>debugging to a MC9S12DT128?
>
>Regards. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
(You need to be a member of 68hc12 -- send a blank email to 68hc12-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Update true-time debugger - Pascal - Oct 12 5:56:00 2005
Thank you Gilles
----- Original Message -----
From: Gilles Blanquin
To: 68HC12@68HC...
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [68HC12] Update true-time debugger
Hi Pascal.
This is ok for programming/debugging.
However, I will check internally about this discrepancy. MC9S12DT128 and
MC9S12DT128B are different silicon masks and the MC9S12DT128 is definitely
missing in selections.
Regards,
Gilles
>Hi,
>
>I'm workin' a MC9S12DT128 on my testcard with Code Warrior true-time
>debugger and a P&E USB-ML-12 rev A multilink and the derivative to
>select for is non present in the debugger. So I'm using for the moment
>the MC9S12DT128B derivative...
>Is it correct or could that cause some errors in the debugging?
>And could I update my true-time debugger or my multilink to adapt the
>debugging to a MC9S12DT128?
>
>Regards. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
(You need to be a member of 68hc12 -- send a blank email to 68hc12-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
----- Original Message -----
From: Gilles Blanquin
To: 68HC12@68HC...
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [68HC12] Update true-time debugger
Hi Pascal.
This is ok for programming/debugging.
However, I will check internally about this discrepancy. MC9S12DT128 and
MC9S12DT128B are different silicon masks and the MC9S12DT128 is definitely
missing in selections.
Regards,
Gilles
>Hi,
>
>I'm workin' a MC9S12DT128 on my testcard with Code Warrior true-time
>debugger and a P&E USB-ML-12 rev A multilink and the derivative to
>select for is non present in the debugger. So I'm using for the moment
>the MC9S12DT128B derivative...
>Is it correct or could that cause some errors in the debugging?
>And could I update my true-time debugger or my multilink to adapt the
>debugging to a MC9S12DT128?
>
>Regards. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
(You need to be a member of 68hc12 -- send a blank email to 68hc12-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )