Join our technical discussions about Freescale Microcontrollers: M68HC12. (Freescale Semiconductor is a Subsidiary of Motorola).
|
Being in a minority (I think...) of programing in assembly and no C, I'm having problems finding the basical program for the 9S12DP256 in assebly. I moved from the D60 (which had an assembly program at the start with some equates and initializations), which also programmed in assembly. Now I got the 9S12 from Technological Arts, and all I can see that there is hardly nothing else but ICC12 to use it with? Someone has already programmed it using assembly , or know of where I can get the basic assembly programed? (I have looked , a lot, couldnt find a thing.....) The board though, does work. With the help of a friend (which uses ICC12, that I dont have ,dont intend of using) I managed to upload an .S19 program to it, and to see that it does work - the card is good, and I have the serial bootloader. Other than that.... Thanx! shachar |
|
|
|
In a message dated 7/19/03 12:39:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, writes: ICC12, that I dont have ,dont intend of using Here's an easy way to transition to using a higher level language: download ICC12 30 day eval version, compile a couple of the small example programs, look at the .lst file generated by the compiler... This should read like regular old familiar HC12 assembler.... after a little bit of this, you might get the "Aha!" effect where a light bulb appears over your head and a feeling of nirvana washes over you as you realize how simple this stuff really is...... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Well, thank you for your reply. This would have been a great solution, if only I hadnt tried the ICC12 a year ago... and it expired so I cant use it ever again without buying it.... oi vei. Emmmmm I wonder if there is anyone an 9S12DP256 .lst file to borrow? --- In , BobGardner@a... wrote: > In a message dated 7/19/03 12:39:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > mendiskittle@y... writes: > ICC12, that I dont have ,dont intend of using > Here's an easy way to transition to using a higher level language: download > ICC12 30 day eval version, compile a couple of the small example programs, look > at the .lst file generated by the compiler... This should read like regular > old familiar HC12 assembler.... after a little bit of this, you might get the > "Aha!" effect where a light bulb appears over your head and a feeling of > nirvana washes over you as you realize how simple this stuff really is...... > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
In a message dated 7/19/03 1:08:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, writes: "Well, thank you for your reply. This would have been a great solution, if only I hadnt tried the ICC12 a year ago... and it expired so I cant use it ever again without buying it.... oi vei. Emmmmm I wonder if there is anyone an 9S12DP256 .lst file to borrow?" Send the ICC12 guy an email... richard @imagecraft.com... tell him you did an eval a year ago, but project didnt fly, you now have a new project with a new processor, want one more 30 day eval. I bet he gives you one. Its a great value for $200. certainly cheaper than the $2000 for the other compilers.... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
--- In , BobGardner@a... wrote: > In a message dated 7/19/03 1:08:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > mendiskittle@y... writes: Got it to work at the end..... Had to scrap an assembly file meself with some help from others here too... (eric) but it works :-) Thanks! shachar > "Well, thank you for your reply. This would have been a great solution, > if only I hadnt tried the ICC12 a year ago... and it expired so I cant > use it ever again without buying it.... oi vei. > Emmmmm I wonder if there is anyone an 9S12DP256 .lst file to borrow?" > Send the ICC12 guy an email... richard @imagecraft.com... tell him you did an > eval a year ago, but project didnt fly, you now have a new project with a new > processor, want one more 30 day eval. I bet he gives you one. Its a great > value for $200. certainly cheaper than the $2000 for the other compilers.... > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |