Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search basicx



Search tips

Subscribe to basicx



basicx by Keywords

Accelerometer | ADC | ADXL | Adxl20 | AVR | BasicStamp | BX-35 | BX28 | BX35 | COM3 | Compiler | Downloader | EEPROM | Electromagnet | GetADC | GP2D1 | GPS | I2C | IDE | Keypad | LCD | LCD+ | MIDI | Motors | Multitasking | Netmedia | Networking | PCB | PID | PlaySound | PWM | Relays | RTC | Servo | ShiftOut | SitePlayer | SPI | Stack | Timer | USB

Ads

Discussion Groups

Discussion forum for the BasicX family of microcontroller chips.

adxl202 - lzars2000 - Oct 3 19:53:00 2002

what do i need to put in these consts

Private Const CenterX As Single = 0.5
Private Const DeltaX As Single = 0.125

how do i know what to put

leif





(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )


adxl202 - larzyharzy - Jun 8 6:24:00 2004

I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it because I
saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
ADXL202 evaluation board is used.

Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
evaluation board?

What filter capacitors should be used?

What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of PWM
signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function in
the code, getPeriod.

/Lars





(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: adxl202 - Tom Igoe - Jun 8 7:45:00 2004

I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off human
body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other fast
vibrations.

The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things. On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:

> I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it because I
> saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
> accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
> ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
>
> Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
> evaluation board?
>
> What filter capacitors should be used?
>
> What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of PWM
> signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function in
> the code, getPeriod.
>
> /Lars > Yahoo! Groups Links >
--
Tom Igoe





(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: adxl202 - Alain Vincent V. Abitria - Jun 8 7:59:00 2004

Hey Lars,

Where did you buy ADXL202? Can you help me find a dealer of ADXL202 in the internet? I also need it. rsvp Tom Igoe <> wrote:
I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off human
body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other fast
vibrations.

The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things. On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:

> I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it because I
> saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
> accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
> ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
>
> Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
> evaluation board?
>
> What filter capacitors should be used?
>
> What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of PWM
> signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function in
> the code, getPeriod.
>
> /Lars > Yahoo! Groups Links >
--
Tom Igoe Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT ---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: adxl202 - larzyharzy - Jun 8 12:05:00 2004

Ok - thanks, I will try that.

/lars

--- In , Tom Igoe <tom.igoe@n...> wrote:
> I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off
human
> body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other fast
> vibrations.
>
> The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things. > On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:
>
> > I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it because
I
> > saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
> > accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
> > ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
> > evaluation board?
> >
> > What filter capacitors should be used?
> >
> > What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of
PWM
> > signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function
in
> > the code, getPeriod.
> >
> > /Lars
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Tom Igoe




(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: adxl202 - Tom Igoe - Jun 8 13:41:00 2004

Digikey has them, but Analog will also give you limited samples.
On Jun 8, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Alain Vincent V. Abitria wrote:

> Hey Lars,
>
> Where did you buy ADXL202? Can you help me find a dealer of ADXL202
> in the internet? I also need it. rsvp > Tom Igoe <> wrote:
> I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off human
> body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other fast
> vibrations.
>
> The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things. > On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:
>
>> I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it because I
>> saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
>> accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
>> ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
>>
>> Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
>> evaluation board?
>>
>> What filter capacitors should be used?
>>
>> What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of PWM
>> signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function in
>> the code, getPeriod.
>>
>> /Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Tom Igoe > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT > ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To >
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
> today! Download Messenger Now
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
> Yahoo! Groups Links >
--
Tom Igoe





(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: adxl202 - larzyharzy - Jun 9 13:21:00 2004

I bought mine at Farnell for 32 pounds

/Lars

--- In , Tom Igoe <tom.igoe@n...> wrote:
> Digikey has them, but Analog will also give you limited samples. >
> On Jun 8, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Alain Vincent V. Abitria wrote:
>
> > Hey Lars,
> >
> > Where did you buy ADXL202? Can you help me find a dealer of
ADXL202
> > in the internet? I also need it. rsvp
> >
> >
> > Tom Igoe <tom.igoe@n...> wrote:
> > I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off
human
> > body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other
fast
> > vibrations.
> >
> > The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things.
> >
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:
> >
> >> I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it
because I
> >> saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
> >> accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
> >> ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
> >> evaluation board?
> >>
> >> What filter capacitors should be used?
> >>
> >> What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of
PWM
> >> signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function
in
> >> the code, getPeriod.
> >>
> >> /Lars
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Tom Igoe
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
> > today! Download Messenger Now
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Tom Igoe




(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: adxl202 - Michael Puchol - Jun 9 13:40:00 2004

What? They can be ordered direct at the Analog web site for some $16 a
piece. There is also a cheaper alternative at $9 which only has analogue
outputs, which you can read with an A/D converter.

Regards,

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "larzyharzy" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:21 PM
Subject: [BasicX] Re: adxl202 > I bought mine at Farnell for 32 pounds
>
> /Lars
>
> --- In , Tom Igoe <tom.igoe@n...> wrote:
> > Digikey has them, but Analog will also give you limited samples.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Alain Vincent V. Abitria wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Lars,
> > >
> > > Where did you buy ADXL202? Can you help me find a dealer of
> ADXL202
> > > in the internet? I also need it. rsvp
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom Igoe <tom.igoe@n...> wrote:
> > > I use 0.47uF caps and 1 1Mohm Rset. Gives me good results off
> human
> > > body movements, but might be slow for automotive use or other
> fast
> > > vibrations.
> > >
> > > The hard part without the eval board is soldering the things.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:24 AM, larzyharzy wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have just bought an ADXL202 accelerometer. I bought it
> because I
> > >> saw that there is an example application for the BX-24 for this
> > >> accelerometer. But in the application note I can see that the
> > >> ADXL202 evaluation board is used.
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone have experience with using the ADXL202 without the
> > >> evaluation board?
> > >>
> > >> What filter capacitors should be used?
> > >>
> > >> What resistor value should be used for the right T2 (period of
> PWM
> > >> signal)? Or does it matter - I can see that there is a function
> in
> > >> the code, getPeriod.
> > >>
> > >> /Lars
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Tom Igoe
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > > To
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
> > > today! Download Messenger Now
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > Tom Igoe > Yahoo! Groups Links




(You need to be a member of basicx -- send a blank email to basicx-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )