Discussion forum for the BasicX family of microcontroller chips.
|
Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike |
|
|
|
Mike, It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new DLL in the same Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you changed DLLs? ---------- From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
This is identical to the problem I reported several days under Win2K. A couple of other people responded the same way, and nobody reported success IIRC. Netmedia has been silent on the subject. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:40 PM To: 'Miguel Puchol' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Mike, It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new DLL in the same Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you changed DLLs? ---------- From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
Mike; We have had this problem. The solution is to either have a Windows 98 or Win2000 interface between the application at the front end and millenium. You need to set class path and class in autoexec.bat for the above mentioned interface. This will solve the problem. Ciao; Dr. James E. Hubbard, Jr. Chief Technology Officer Iprovica 8 Saint Mary's Street Boston, Ma. 02215 (617) 358-0227 ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Harriman <> To: 'Miguel Puchol' <> Cc: <> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:39 PM Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me > Mike, > > It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new > DLL in the same > Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you > changed DLLs? > > ---------- > From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM > To: > Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me > > Hi, > > After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC > running > Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a > few days > ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: > > - The ActiveX component could not be created. > - Error defining code boundaries. > > Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried > the > upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, > maybe it's a > problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) > > Cheers all, > > Mike > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
Matt, Did you put the DLL in your windows system directory per the instructions? How can you say NetMedia is being "Silent" on the DLL subject when you just posted your comment on a NetMedia reply regarding this very subject? Chris ---------- From: Matthew Daughtrey [SMTP:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:26 PM To: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me This is identical to the problem I reported several days under Win2K. A couple of other people responded the same way, and nobody reported success IIRC. Netmedia has been silent on the subject. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:40 PM To: 'Miguel Puchol' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Mike, It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new DLL in the same Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you changed DLLs? ---------- From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
Because they originally posted the fix 1/29. I tried the installation (which failed exactly as below) and replied the same day, as did several other people. Netmedia has posted no message addressing this problem. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:02 PM To: 'Matthew Daughtrey' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Matt, Did you put the DLL in your windows system directory per the instructions? How can you say NetMedia is being "Silent" on the DLL subject when you just posted your comment on a NetMedia reply regarding this very subject? Chris ---------- From: Matthew Daughtrey [SMTP:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:26 PM To: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me This is identical to the problem I reported several days under Win2K. A couple of other people responded the same way, and nobody reported success IIRC. Netmedia has been silent on the subject. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:40 PM To: 'Miguel Puchol' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Mike, It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new DLL in the same Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you changed DLLs? ---------- From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
|
Matt, I looked at your e-mail regarding this and noticed you installed the DLL into Your system32 directory. Try putting the DLL in your system directory that Should make it work. Chris ---------- From: Matthew Daughtrey [SMTP:] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 1:08 PM To: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Because they originally posted the fix 1/29. I tried the installation (which failed exactly as below) and replied the same day, as did several other people. Netmedia has posted no message addressing this problem. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:02 PM To: 'Matthew Daughtrey' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Matt, Did you put the DLL in your windows system directory per the instructions? How can you say NetMedia is being "Silent" on the DLL subject when you just posted your comment on a NetMedia reply regarding this very subject? Chris ---------- From: Matthew Daughtrey [SMTP:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:26 PM To: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me This is identical to the problem I reported several days under Win2K. A couple of other people responded the same way, and nobody reported success IIRC. Netmedia has been silent on the subject. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Harriman [mailto:] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:40 PM To: 'Miguel Puchol' Cc: ' Subject: RE: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Mike, It sounds like the BasicX software can't find the DLL. Did you put the new DLL in the same Directory as the old one? Did the BasicX software EVER work before you changed DLLs? ---------- From: Miguel Puchol [SMTP:] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 4:16 AM To: Subject: [BasicX] Compiler problem in Windows Me Hi, After having installed the BasicX compiler, V1.47, on the desktop PC running Windows Millenium Ed. and then updated the DLL file as mentioned a few days ago, I get the following errors when trying to compile: - The ActiveX component could not be created. - Error defining code boundaries. Any ideas? The old DLL doesn't seem to work either. I haven't tried the upgrade on my W2k-installed laptop, where the compiler runs OK, maybe it's a problem with Me. (As in Millenium Edition, not 'Myself' :-)) Cheers all, Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |