This list is for discussion of the design and implementation of field-programmable gate array based processors and integrated systems. It is also for discussion and community support of the XSOC Project (see http://www.fpgacpu.org/xsoc).
|
Hey guys (newby here), I am looking for a cheep development board with a few cool additions on it. My sole reason (one of them anyway) is to move from coding that we do in class (3rd year, EE) to the actual development of home projects that I can keep. From moving from C++ to uControllers, I found a huge improvement in my coding ability... and my overall understanding of embedded systems. Heres what I have found so far... A XSA-100 board (32mb sram, XC2S200 fpga, xc9572sl cpld) ~149.00 http://www.xess.com/prod034.php3 Altium Live Design (EP1C12F3324/XC3S400 fpga, sram, audio, several ports) ~ 99.00 http://www.altium.com/livedesign/ C-nit (Spartan-II 100K gate fpga, sram, only headers) ~90 http://www.c-nit.net/ Digilent Pegasus (XC2S50 fpga, ports/buttons/leds)~89 https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=PEGASUS fpga4fun.com Pluto (EP1K10TC100 fpga, no ports, bare bones) ~50 http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto.html fpga4fun.com PlutoII (EP1C3T100 fpga, same as above) ~80 http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto-II.html I think having VGA, PS2 or serial, plus a few other leds/ 7 segments would be nice, but not entirely necessary. Does anyone know of other cheep boards hopefully under 100usd that could be considerd a good starter kit? Thanks, Chris |
|
|
|
Get one of the Pluto boards....you can make your own VGA, PS2, serial connectors easily from scrounged parts or a few $$$ at Digikey or your local electronics store. And...you'll have a much greater sense of accomplishment and truly understand what's going on. -marc On 1/23/05 1:49 AM, "sirtiffguy" <> wrote: > > > Hey guys (newby here), > > I am looking for a cheep development board with a few cool additions > on it. My sole reason (one of them anyway) is to move from coding > that we do in class (3rd year, EE) to the actual development of home > projects that I can keep. > >> From moving from C++ to uControllers, I found a huge improvement in > my coding ability... and my overall understanding of embedded > systems. > > Heres what I have found so far... > A XSA-100 board (32mb sram, XC2S200 fpga, xc9572sl cpld) ~149.00 > http://www.xess.com/prod034.php3 > > Altium Live Design (EP1C12F3324/XC3S400 fpga, sram, audio, several > ports) ~ 99.00 > http://www.altium.com/livedesign/ > > C-nit (Spartan-II 100K gate fpga, sram, only headers) ~90 > http://www.c-nit.net/ > > Digilent Pegasus (XC2S50 fpga, ports/buttons/leds)~89 > https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=PEGASUS > > fpga4fun.com Pluto (EP1K10TC100 fpga, no ports, bare bones) ~50 > http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto.html > > fpga4fun.com PlutoII (EP1C3T100 fpga, same as above) ~80 > http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto-II.html > > I think having VGA, PS2 or serial, plus a few other leds/ 7 segments > would be nice, but not entirely necessary. > > Does anyone know of other cheep boards hopefully under 100usd that > could be considerd a good starter kit? > > Thanks, > Chris > > > To post a message, send it to: > To unsubscribe, send a blank message to: > Yahoo! Groups Links |
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "sirtiffguy" <> To: <> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:49 AM Subject: [fpga-cpu] New to FPGA development > Hey guys (newby here), > > I am looking for a cheep development board with a few cool additions > on it. My sole reason (one of them anyway) is to move from coding > that we do in class (3rd year, EE) to the actual development of home > projects that I can keep. > > From moving from C++ to uControllers, I found a huge improvement in > my coding ability... and my overall understanding of embedded > systems. > > Heres what I have found so far... > A XSA-100 board (32mb sram, XC2S200 fpga, xc9572sl cpld) ~149.00 > http://www.xess.com/prod034.php3 > > Altium Live Design (EP1C12F3324/XC3S400 fpga, sram, audio, several > ports) ~ 99.00 > http://www.altium.com/livedesign/ > > C-nit (Spartan-II 100K gate fpga, sram, only headers) ~90 > http://www.c-nit.net/ > > Digilent Pegasus (XC2S50 fpga, ports/buttons/leds)~89 > https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=PEGASUS > > fpga4fun.com Pluto (EP1K10TC100 fpga, no ports, bare bones) ~50 > http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto.html > > fpga4fun.com PlutoII (EP1C3T100 fpga, same as above) ~80 > http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto-II.html > > I think having VGA, PS2 or serial, plus a few other leds/ 7 segments > would be nice, but not entirely necessary. > > Does anyone know of other cheep boards hopefully under 100usd that > could be considerd a good starter kit? The Xilinx starter kit is $99. It's actually made by Digilent. Leon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 19/01/2005 |
|
Chris wrote: > I think having VGA, PS2 or serial, plus a few other leds/ 7 segments > would be nice, but not entirely necessary. > > Does anyone know of other cheep boards hopefully under 100usd that > could be considerd a good starter kit? Spartan 3 starter kit, available from either Xilinx or Digilent, has exactly the I/O you described, and 1MB of SRAM (256K*32), using an XC3S200. It costs $99: http://www.xilinx.com/products/spartan3/s3boards.htm https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=S3BOARD Digilent has in the past also offered the same board with an XC3S400 for a slightly higher price, but that doesn't seem to be available at the moment. Digilent also offers some expansion boards. I bought a starter kit from Xilinx, and have been very happy with it. If you want to use a PC keyboard or mouse with the PS/2 port, it is likely that you have to move a jumper that configures the port voltage. For no apparent reason, Digilent designed it to support 3.3V PS/2, which doesn't exist, and that is the default setting. Eric |
|
> >Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 06:49:54 -0000 > From: "sirtiffguy" <> >Subject: New to FPGA development > >Hey guys (newby here), > >I am looking for a cheep development board with a few cool additions >on it. My sole reason (one of them anyway) is to move from coding >that we do in class (3rd year, EE) to the actual development of home >projects that I can keep. > >>From moving from C++ to uControllers, I found a huge improvement in >my coding ability... and my overall understanding of embedded >systems. > >Heres what I have found so far... >A XSA-100 board (32mb sram, XC2S200 fpga, xc9572sl cpld) ~149.00 >http://www.xess.com/prod034.php3 > >Altium Live Design (EP1C12F3324/XC3S400 fpga, sram, audio, several >ports) ~ 99.00 >http://www.altium.com/livedesign/ > >C-nit (Spartan-II 100K gate fpga, sram, only headers) ~90 >http://www.c-nit.net/ > >Digilent Pegasus (XC2S50 fpga, ports/buttons/leds)~89 >https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=PEGASUS > >fpga4fun.com Pluto (EP1K10TC100 fpga, no ports, bare bones) ~50 >http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto.html > >fpga4fun.com PlutoII (EP1C3T100 fpga, same as above) ~80 >http://www.fpga4fun.com/board_pluto-II.html > >I think having VGA, PS2 or serial, plus a few other leds/ 7 segments >would be nice, but not entirely necessary. > >Does anyone know of other cheep boards hopefully under 100usd that >could be considerd a good starter kit? > >Thanks, >Chris > Personally i really like the Digilient Spartan-3 board ( https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=S3BOARD ) though id opt for the larger FPGA when ordered... Can never have enough .. Too bad they dont offer the even bigger chips. Its a tad over 100 with the 'upgrade'.. Although a bit more expensive the stuff @ http://www.trenz-electronic.de/prod/proden20.htm also look interesting as you have many ports, and a wider array of FPGA options ( they are plugin modules ). |
|
|
|
Tony wrote: >> >> >> >Personally i really like the Digilient Spartan-3 board ( >https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=S3BOARD ) >though id opt for the larger FPGA when ordered... Can never have enough >.. Too bad they dont offer the >even bigger chips. Its a tad over 100 with the 'upgrade'.. Rumour says a larger version of the S3 kit may be comming soon. Only thing a second ps2 port would be nice. Can make your own or one of the addons with another ps/2. The usb addon is great(but should be builtin on new boards from them) and still haven't got around to trying the ethernet addon. The module boards look good for robotics etc. On a board with larger fpga would be nice to have: 2 ps/2 , 1 vga (but at least 8bit or more color) , serial , usb jtag(on board), leds , switches, compact flash / system ace or flash, more ram . Alex -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 21/01/2005 |
|
|
|
Is this a serious rumor, a marketing test or just a hope? I would really like to buy another Starter Board if it had a MUCH larger FPGA. One million gates would be good although I could get by with 300k or 400k. --- In , Alex Gibson <alxx@t...> wrote: > Tony wrote: > > >> > >> > >> > >Personally i really like the Digilient Spartan-3 board ( > >https://digilent.us/Sales/Product.cfm?Prod=S3BOARD ) > >though id opt for the larger FPGA when ordered... Can never have enough > >.. Too bad they dont offer the > >even bigger chips. Its a tad over 100 with the 'upgrade'.. > > > > > > Rumour says a larger version of the S3 kit may be comming soon. > > Only thing a second ps2 port would be nice. > Can make your own or one of the addons with another ps/2. > > The usb addon is great(but should be builtin on new boards from them) > and still haven't got around > to trying the ethernet addon. > > The module boards look good for robotics etc. > > On a board with larger fpga would be nice to have: > 2 ps/2 , 1 vga (but at least 8bit or more color) , serial , usb jtag (on > board), > leds , switches, compact flash / system ace or flash, more ram . > > Alex > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 21/01/2005 |
|
|
|
--- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > Is this a serious rumor, a marketing test or just a hope? I would > really like to buy another Starter Board if it had a MUCH larger > FPGA. One million gates would be good although I could get by with > 300k or 400k. There *is* a version of an S3 eval board which uses the XC3S400. Nuhorizons sells it for $164 at http://www.nuhorizons.com/products/xilinx/spartan3/development-board.html It has lots of features on the board, but only provides 20 user IOs. Still, this seems to be a pretty good bargain to me if it suits your needs. |
|
|
|
Not really. I erased my 'rant' about IO before I posted the message. I absolutely hate the idea that the JTAG signals are present on EVERY connector plus the dedicated header. I also don't see any utility in having the SRAM address and data carried out to the connectors. If someone is willing to give up that much IO, do it through the FPGA by duplicating the signals! My biggest complaint about the Starter Board is the paucity of IO at the connectors. Well, maybe my second biggest complaint... I am trying to build a 32 bit logic analyzer. Do you think that there is one single 40 pin connector where I can bring in 32 signals plus a trigger and external clock. Nope. But I can program it no matter how I hook it up. Seriously, one of the best features of the BurchED B5-300 board is IO. The only dedicated pin is the single LED and I suppose it could still be used as an input since it has a 2.7k resistor. The downside is that everything else is off board. Why have a 256 BGA with 20 IO for the user? Ok, that's enough ranting. I like both boards and I am happy I have them. They both fill a niche and I will keep them. Ranting when I have time... --- In , dsprelated@a... wrote: > > --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > > > > > Is this a serious rumor, a marketing test or just a hope? I would > > really like to buy another Starter Board if it had a MUCH larger > > FPGA. One million gates would be good although I could get by with > > 300k or 400k. > > There *is* a version of an S3 eval board which uses the XC3S400. > Nuhorizons sells it for $164 at > > http://www.nuhorizons.com/products/xilinx/spartan3/development- board.html > > It has lots of features on the board, but only provides 20 user IOs. > Still, this seems to be a pretty good bargain to me if it suits your > needs. |
|
|
|
Well, how about this board? http://www.enterpoint.co.uk/moelbryn/broaddown2.html It uses a 456 pin package and multiple choices of FPGA with the XC3S400 being the *smallest*. --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > Not really. > > I erased my 'rant' about IO before I posted the message. I > absolutely hate the idea that the JTAG signals are present on EVERY > connector plus the dedicated header. |
|
Here's another that seems to be nothing *but* IO. http://www.trenz-electronic.de/prod/proden19.htm Here is one that at least meets your 32 IO requirement. http://www.orangetreetech.com/zestsc1.htm And this one... http://www.logic.nl/bcinfo.asp?bc=222 There may be more. I searched on "xc3s400 board" at Google and these are just the ones on the first page. --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > Not really. > > I erased my 'rant' about IO before I posted the message. I > absolutely hate the idea that the JTAG signals are present on EVERY > connector plus the dedicated header. |
|
|
|
That zestsc1 would be perfect for my immediate application! Just the right stuff on board and plenty of IO. Way overpriced... I guess I'll use two edge connectors on the Starter Board, save at least $400 and just shut up. --- In , dsprelated@a... wrote: > > Here's another that seems to be nothing *but* IO. > > http://www.trenz-electronic.de/prod/proden19.htm > > Here is one that at least meets your 32 IO requirement. > > http://www.orangetreetech.com/zestsc1.htm > > And this one... > > http://www.logic.nl/bcinfo.asp?bc=222 > There may be more. I searched on "xc3s400 board" at Google and these > are just the ones on the first page. > --- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > > > Not really. > > > > I erased my 'rant' about IO before I posted the message. I > > absolutely hate the idea that the JTAG signals are present on EVERY > > connector plus the dedicated header. |
|
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 22:15, rtstofer wrote: > I am trying to build a 32 bit logic analyzer. Do you think that > there is one single 40 pin connector where I can bring in 32 signals > plus a trigger and external clock. Nope. But I can program it no > matter how I hook it up. If internal ram is enough you can get USB 2.0 and 120 user IO on two connectors from a Trenz Micromodule for 99¤. Kolja Sulimma |
|
--- In , "rtstofer" <rstofer@p...> wrote: > > I am trying to build a 32 bit logic analyzer. Do you think that > there is one single 40 pin connector where I can bring in 32 signals > plus a trigger and external clock. Nope. But I can program it no > matter how I hook it up. One thing I do on my boards is to use a standard connector and pin out for logic analyzer connections. HP has several pinouts defined that you can work with. One is a 40 pin connector with 16 signal, 2 clock, 2 power (don't know why?) and 20 grounds. This is their cable end. You can use an adapter that they sell to condense this down to a 20 pin connector with just one ground and one power. I use this footprint on my development boards (and will provide it on the AT91SAM7 board I am designing) to allow rapid connection of the logic analyzer. Otherwise you have to use all those little grabber things which I don't really like. If you can't find the info on the HP web site (opps, Agilent) I can come up with the PDF file. |
|
|
|
> HP has several [logic analyzer probe] pinouts defined that > you can work with. One is a 40 pin connector with 16 signal, 2 clock, > 2 power (don't know why?) and 20 grounds. This is their cable end. > You can use an adapter that they sell to condense this down to a 20 > pin connector with just one ground and one power. Watch out! The HP/Agilent 20-pin target connector is at target (device) logic levels, but the 40-pin probe cable connector is not. The HP/Agilent 01650-63203 "termination adapter" is not a straight pass-through, but contain an RC network, just as their lead sets that plug onto the probe cable do. This to provide high input impedance. It's documented in the manual for the termination adapter, which I've seen in paper form but can't find on the Agilent web site, or in "Probing Solutions for Logic Analyzers", Agilent document 5968-4632E, dated March 27, 2003: http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5968-4632E.pdf 8.2 pF target +------| (-------+ analyzer pod connector | | connector 250 ohm | 90.9 Kohm | signal -------/\/\/\----+-----/\/\/\-----+--------- signal ground -------------------------------------------- ground If you're building a target device intended to work with an HP/Agilent analyzer, you want the 20-pin connectors, or the newer "Mictor" high-density ones. If you want the target to be compatable with the HP/Agilent 40-pin probe cable connector, you have to put the RC networks on the target board. If you're building your own logic analyzer, and want to support HP/Agilent lead sets or termination adapters, you will have to take the RC network into consideration. Eric |
|
|
|
--- In , "Eric Smith" <eric@b...> wrote: > > HP has several [logic analyzer probe] pinouts defined that > > you can work with. One is a 40 pin connector with 16 signal, 2 clock, > > 2 power (don't know why?) and 20 grounds. This is their cable end. > > You can use an adapter that they sell to condense this down to a 20 > > pin connector with just one ground and one power. > > Watch out! The HP/Agilent 20-pin target connector is at target (device) > logic levels, but the 40-pin probe cable connector is not. The > HP/Agilent 01650-63203 "termination adapter" is not a straight > pass-through, but contain an RC network, just as their lead sets that > plug onto the probe cable do. This to provide high input impedance. > It's documented in the manual for the termination adapter, which I've > seen in paper form but can't find on the Agilent web site, or in > "Probing Solutions for Logic Analyzers", Agilent document 5968-4632E, > dated March 27, 2003: > http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5968-4632E.pdf > > 8.2 pF > target +------| (-------+ analyzer pod > connector | | connector > 250 ohm | 90.9 Kohm | > signal -------/\/\/\----+-----/\/\/\-----+--------- signal > > ground -------------------------------------------- ground > If you're building a target device intended to work with an HP/Agilent > analyzer, you want the 20-pin connectors, or the newer "Mictor" > high-density ones. If you want the target to be compatable with the > HP/Agilent 40-pin probe cable connector, you have to put the RC networks > on the target board. > > If you're building your own logic analyzer, and want to support > HP/Agilent lead sets or termination adapters, you will have to take the > RC network into consideration. Thanks for the info. I have always used their 20 pin adapter, so I forgot about it containing the RC network. This is also covered in their App Note 1244-1 which I have uploaded to the files section of the AT91SAM7 group (since that is where I am using the connectors at the moment). I have looked at the Mictor connector, but I seem to recall that it has a downside. Maybe it is just not compatible with the older logic analyzers? Or maybe it is the cost, I know HP stuff is not cheap. I can't recall. |