Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search lpc2000



Search tips

Subscribe to lpc2000



lpc2000 by Keywords

2106 | ADC | ARM7 | Atmel | Bootloader | CAN | CrossStudio | CrossWorks | DDS | ECos | Ethernet | ETM | FIFO | FLASH | FPGA | GCC | GDB | GNU | GNUARM | GPIO | I2C | IAP | IAR | JTAG | Kickstart | LCD | Linux | LPC | LPC-E2294 | LPC2000 | LPC2100 | LPC2104 | Lpc2106 | Lpc210x | LPC2114 | LPC2119 | LPC2124 | LPC2129 | Lpc2138 | LPC213x | LPC21xx | LPC2210 | LPC2212 | LPC2214 | LPC2292 | LPC2294 | LPC2xxx | LPC3128 | MCB2100 | Olimex | Philips | PWM | Rowley | RTC | RTOS | SPI | SSP | UART | UART0 | UART1 | ULINK | USB | Watchdog | Wiggler

Ads

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | LPC2000 | Re: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100

Discussion group dedicated to the Philips LPC2000 family of ARM MCUs

Re: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100 - microbit - Dec 4 21:24:00 2003

Hi Leon,

Looks like you might have to consider Bruce's strategy of delaying intiial
posts,
as invariably these spam scumbags found their way into the system.
Why can't these kind of people just drop dead ???
(Of course they can still upload stupid files, but hey, c'est la vie)

Whoever this sugadedadi is, you're a moron to entertain the notion that
anyone here is
actually interested in your bullshit. -- Kris ----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100 >
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the lpc2100
> group.
>
> File : /Best online dating review site
> Uploaded by : sugadedadi1623 <>
> Description : Navigate through thousands of dating reviews
>
> You can access this file at the URL http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2100/files/Best%20online%20dating%20review%
20site
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
>
> Regards,
>
> sugadedadi1623 < >
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT >
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )


Re: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100 - Leon Heller - Dec 5 1:34:00 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: "microbit" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100 > Hi Leon,
>
> Looks like you might have to consider Bruce's strategy of delaying intiial
> posts,
> as invariably these spam scumbags found their way into the system.
> Why can't these kind of people just drop dead ???
> (Of course they can still upload stupid files, but hey, c'est la vie)
>
> Whoever this sugadedadi is, you're a moron to entertain the notion that
> anyone here is
> actually interested in your bullshit.

I've deleted it and banned him. If it proves to be a problem I'll change the
joining procedure.

Leon





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] New file uploaded to lpc2100 - microbit - Dec 5 3:51:00 2003

Hi Leon,
 
> I've deleted it and banned him. If it proves to be a problem I'll change the
> joining procedure.
Thanks for the relief :-)
I can imagine it must be a time consuming task to keep the list spam free.
As you undoubdtedly would know, Bruce Cannon on Y! MSP430 finds himself introducing
delays of  up to one week to screen the first post.
I think that is not unreasoanble considering it saves us from yet more spam again, and
it is an altruistic task after all.
 
I don't know about others, but I get about 50-70 spams a day (including "anti-spam" SW spam :-),
so my tolerance has exponentially decreased the last 2 years for this rubbish.
 
I hope I didn't offend anyone (except for sugardaddy subcreature)
 
Best regards,
Kris




(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - otc_friend - Dec 12 10:22:00 2003

1) Search for 74AC244. A 2x 4-lines buffer, high-speed, symmetrical-driven
high-current output.
2) The R stands for the greek ohms symbol. So you're right.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ShinJi <>
An: <>
Datum: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2003 15:53
Betreff: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 > Wow !!! Thank you for the upload Leon.
> This is all there is to it? I am suprised.
>
> Two quick questions, if I may.
>
> 1) Is the AC244 a line buffer/driver? (I searched for it on google
>and see that fairchild makes one)
>
> 2) What is the Value of 51R? Is this meant to be read as 51 Ohms?
>(guessing here, not sure)
>
> Thanks again !~
>
> Phillip
> KD4HBW
>
>--- In , wrote:
>>
>> File : /wiggler.txt
>> Uploaded by : leon_heller <leon_heller@h...>
>> Description : Wiggler circuit (ASCII art)
> >
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:




(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - Leon Heller - Dec 12 11:29:00 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: "ShinJi" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 > Wow !!! Thank you for the upload Leon.
> This is all there is to it? I am suprised.
>
> Two quick questions, if I may.
>
> 1) Is the AC244 a line buffer/driver? (I searched for it on google
> and see that fairchild makes one)

Yes, a 74AC244. An 'HC244 will probably work and is what I'll try on my
prototype, as I've got lots of them. > 2) What is the Value of 51R? Is this meant to be read as 51 Ohms?
> (guessing here, not sure)

Yes, it's 51 Ohms. That notation is common in Europe.






(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - David Willmore - Dec 12 12:13:00 2003

> Yes, it's 51 Ohms. That notation is common in Europe.

Is this the:
integer-part (unit character) fractional-part
notation like calling 9600 baud 9k6?

I like that notation. Given that it implies the
common engineering notation of only using scientific
notation where the exponent is a multiple of three,
it works well with other 'accepted practices'. :)

I think my first proto will use an LM317 that I
found in my parts box, but later ones will probably
use a Silicon Standards SS6734 series part. These
guys make a bunch of 300mA LDO regulators that also
come in TO-92 cases. Yeah.

Speaking of that, whoever makes the next batch of
proto boards might think to use a dual output switching
design that takes in 5-12V or so an produces the 3.3V
and 1.8V outputs. I'd be glad to help with the design.

Oh, further off topic (but still on topic...) does anyone
have any proto boards made up or will they in the near
furture? I could use a few. Contact me off list, please
and we'll try to work something out. It would be nice
if we could offer something like Leon's board to people.

Oh, and the callsign here is N0YMV. :)

Cheers,
David





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - otc_friend - Dec 13 4:33:00 2003

>> Yes, it's 51 Ohms. That notation is common in Europe.
>
>Is this the:
>integer-part (unit character) fractional-part
>notation like calling 9600 baud 9k6?
Yes. I thought it is the world-wide engineering notation common to circuit
design??





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - David Willmore - Dec 13 13:33:00 2003

> >> Yes, it's 51 Ohms. That notation is common in Europe.
> >
> >Is this the:
> >integer-part (unit character) fractional-part
> >notation like calling 9600 baud 9k6?
> Yes. I thought it is the world-wide engineering notation common to circuit
> design??

It's not commonly used in the USA, but it's catching on. It's still
typical to say 9.6K instead of 9k6 or, since it doesn't save digits,
just 9600. :) Personally, I really like the 9k6 notation and I push
its use amongst the designers I know.

Cheers,
David





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - Author Unknown - Dec 29 11:41:00 2003

Hello Leon,

Is the delivered HEX file working or not ?
Is the self compiled HEX file working or not ?
Do you use it on a LPC2106 or any other ? How much MHz is your oscillator ?
Do you use GCC 3.4 or a previous version ? Windows or Linux ?

I meanwhile use the basic things from these projects in various small test
projects (like UART handling, RTC, a humidity and temperature sensor,
SPI...) and they are working fine. Can you tell me what is not working ? Are
the PINs switched to outputs or simply not blinking ? As far as i read on
your webpage, you have a JTAG running, can you debug what it is doing on
your board ?

Greetings,

Martin ----- Original Message -----
From: "leon_heller" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 > --- In , wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This email message is a notification to let you know that
> > a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the lpc2100
> > group.
> >
> > File : /lpc2106_gcc.zip
> > Uploaded by : capiman26061973 <capiman@t...>
> > Description : Basic project files for LPC2106 and GCC 3.4 (but
> should work for all LPC210x and all GCC versions) > I can't get executables produced with this to work. Does anyone else
> have a problem? The supplied hex file loads OK, but doesn't produce
> any output.
>
> Leon





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 - Leon Heller - Dec 29 11:58:00 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [lpc2100] Re: New file uploaded to lpc2100 > Hello Leon,
>
> Is the delivered HEX file working or not ?
> Is the self compiled HEX file working or not ?

Neither work. The same program compiled with the RAL tools works OK.

> Do you use it on a LPC2106 or any other ? How much MHz is your oscillator
?

LPC2106, 10 MHz oscillator.

> Do you use GCC 3.4 or a previous version ? Windows or Linux ?

I'm using gcc 3.3.2 under Cygwin. > I meanwhile use the basic things from these projects in various small test
> projects (like UART handling, RTC, a humidity and temperature sensor,
> SPI...) and they are working fine. Can you tell me what is not working ?
Are
> the PINs switched to outputs or simply not blinking ?

They are stuck low.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
Email:
My low-cost Philips LPC210x ARM development system:
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html





(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )