Sign in
Search lpc2000
Subscribe to lpc2000
lpc2000 by Keywords
2106 | ADC | ARM7 | Atmel | Bootloader | CAN | CrossStudio | CrossWorks | DDS | ECos | Ethernet | ETM | FIFO | FLASH | FPGA | GCC | GDB | GNU | GNUARM | GPIO | I2C | IAP | IAR | JTAG | Kickstart | LCD | Linux | LPC | LPC-E2294 | LPC2000 | LPC2100 | LPC2104 | Lpc2106 | Lpc210x | LPC2114 | LPC2119 | LPC2124 | LPC2129 | Lpc2138 | LPC213x | LPC21xx | LPC2210 | LPC2212 | LPC2214 | LPC2292 | LPC2294 | LPC2xxx | LPC3128 | MCB2100 | Olimex | Philips | PWM | Rowley | RTC | RTOS | SPI | SSP | UART | UART0 | UART1 | ULINK | USB | Watchdog | Wiggler
Ads
Discussion Groups
Discussion Groups | LPC2000 | Re: Anyone using IAR's recently released version 5.20 of Embedded Workbench
Discussion group dedicated to the Philips LPC2000 family of ARM MCUs
Anyone using IAR's recently released version 5.20 of Embedded Workbench - Adrian Bica - Jul 18 10:51:50 2008
Hi,
I installed the recently released rev 5.20 ow EW-ARM (previously being
5.11) and I compiled the project developed with 5.11.
During execution I got some random errors which I cannot debug because
the code is too big to debug from RAM and debug from Flash it's a
nightmare. But it looks like compiler does not compile correctly. The
code is completely crazy in some part of it. Looks like some memory is
overwritten.
I think the only thing I can do is to ignore the 5.20 version.
Did anybody have experimented the EW-ARM 5.20? If, yes, can you share
your opinions?
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
I installed the recently released rev 5.20 ow EW-ARM (previously being
5.11) and I compiled the project developed with 5.11.
During execution I got some random errors which I cannot debug because
the code is too big to debug from RAM and debug from Flash it's a
nightmare. But it looks like compiler does not compile correctly. The
code is completely crazy in some part of it. Looks like some memory is
overwritten.
I think the only thing I can do is to ignore the 5.20 version.
Did anybody have experimented the EW-ARM 5.20? If, yes, can you share
your opinions?
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Anyone using IAR's recently released version 5.20 of Embedded Workbench - sig5...@hotmail.com - Jul 18 13:35:08 2008
I have never used the IAR newer vesion you are asking about. But when I tried their older
versions before, they had bugs too. Spent a week trying to deal with those bugs. Then I
tried GNUARM, and my code was running in 2 hours. I stuck with that and never went back
to IAR.
Chris.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Chris.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )