Sign in
Search lpc2000
Subscribe to lpc2000
Ads
Discussion Groups
See Also
Discussion Groups | LPC2000 | LPC2378 CAN GAF - 5 hours of debugging
Discussion group dedicated to the Philips LPC2000 family of ARM MCUs
So far in May, you have voted 0 times ou of a total of 22 votes by the community.
Please help us clean the archives from unuseful discussion threads by using the voting system! Details here.
Is this thread worth a thumbs up?
LPC2378 CAN GAF - 5 hours of debugging - mjames_doveridge - Jul 8 11:46:59 2012
User manual:
'Since each CAN bus has its own
address map, each entry also contains the number of the CAN Controller (001=
-010) to which it applies.'
NO it %$&^£$&** well doesn't!
The controller ID's start at 0, not 1.
5 hours, 200 fags and gallons of coffee later, my system is working again, =
(the controller system, that is - the biological system is shutting down fr=
om overwork).
Many thanks, NXP.
That's what you get for RTFM instead of going with instinct :(
Rgds,
Martin
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
'Since each CAN bus has its own
address map, each entry also contains the number of the CAN Controller (001=
-010) to which it applies.'
NO it %$&^£$&** well doesn't!
The controller ID's start at 0, not 1.
5 hours, 200 fags and gallons of coffee later, my system is working again, =
(the controller system, that is - the biological system is shutting down fr=
om overwork).
Many thanks, NXP.
That's what you get for RTFM instead of going with instinct :(
Rgds,
Martin
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: LPC2378 CAN GAF - 5 hours of debugging - nxp_marketing_usa - Jul 26 14:16:40 2012
Hi Martin,
You are correct....we will be updating the user manuals very shortly.
Thanks.
--- In l..., "mjames_doveridge" w=
rote:
>
> User manual:
>
> 'Since each CAN bus has its own
> address map, each entry also contains the number of the CAN Controller (0=
01-010) to which it applies.'
>
> NO it %$&^£$&** well doesn't!
>
> The controller ID's start at 0, not 1.
>
> 5 hours, 200 fags and gallons of coffee later, my system is working again=
, (the controller system, that is - the biological system is shutting down =
from overwork).
>
> Many thanks, NXP.
>
> That's what you get for RTFM instead of going with instinct :(
>
> Rgds,
> Martin
>
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
You are correct....we will be updating the user manuals very shortly.
Thanks.
--- In l..., "mjames_doveridge" w=
rote:
>
> User manual:
>
> 'Since each CAN bus has its own
> address map, each entry also contains the number of the CAN Controller (0=
01-010) to which it applies.'
>
> NO it %$&^£$&** well doesn't!
>
> The controller ID's start at 0, not 1.
>
> 5 hours, 200 fags and gallons of coffee later, my system is working again=
, (the controller system, that is - the biological system is shutting down =
from overwork).
>
> Many thanks, NXP.
>
> That's what you get for RTFM instead of going with instinct :(
>
> Rgds,
> Martin
>
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: LPC2378 CAN GAF - 5 hours of debugging - mjames_doveridge - Jul 30 7:22:47 2012
>
> You are correct....we will be updating the user manuals very shortly.
> Thanks.
>
Wow! Someone listened to my despairing rant
Nice to know:)
Rgds,
Martin
(You need to be a member of lpc2000 -- send a blank email to lpc2000-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )