27c256 | 4K81H | 68HC11A1 | 68HC11P1 | 68hc24 | 68HC711E9 | 68HC811 | 8255 | A2D | ADC | ADC12138 | Am85C30 | BRCLR | Buffalo | CMOS | EEPROM | EPROM | Ethernet | EVB | EVBU | HC11E1 | HC11E9 | HC711E9 | Horray | ImageCraft | IRQ | Keypad | LCD | MC68HC11D0FN | MC68HC11E1CFU3 | MC68HC11F1 | MC68HC711E9 | MC68HC711E9CFN2 | Microcore11 | Microstamp11 | Minikit | NVRAM | PSD | PSD8xx | PSD9xx | PT1000 | RS232 | RTS | RXD | SPI | SRAM | TXD | Watchdogs | XIRQ

"Darrell N." wrote: > Since I abhor the brain-dead PIC architecture, and Atmel doesn't Not really. Its just a much simpler one. Hence the availability of 40Mhz clock speeds. And many cost effective variants. > seem much better, I'll be sticking with Motorola. Probably the Whatever works for you. But PIC processors will always be available. And upwardly compatible (within families). Will the Motorola ones? Why are there no HC11's with more than 2K of flash? (are there any now? I stopped looking/waiting for one after I changed horses). > '12, but the 908 stuff in some cases is even more powerful than > the '11, so I don't necessarily see it as a downgrade. The > Nitrons are nice "PIC Killers" for small apps, as well. Sure. If you are certain that you can get them in the future. I have been burned by HC11 allocation problems too many times to ever go back to Motorola. While I prefer the Moto architecture, their repeated inability to deliver product in a reasonable time frame forced me to cross them off my list of possible suppliers. > Long live Motorola! Long live Microchip, Atmel, Maxim/Dallas, etc. We need choice and multiple suppliers of a given architecture. Single source is a 'bad thing'. Burn me once... Robert

(You need to be a member of m68hc11 -- send a blank email to m68hc11-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )