|
On Jan 26, 2004, at 11:02 AM, Darrell N. wrote: >> >> On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Darrell N. wrote: >> >>> Robert: >>> >>> Jeez, Robert, if you hate Motorola so much why do you hang >>> around the list? It doesn't matter if a PIC runs at 40 MHz, a >>> fast piece of crap is still a piece of crap... And I can't see >>> how the PIC braindead memory paging and RPN logic is in any way >>> simpler than an 'HC11... >> >> That kind of attitude doesn't belong in a professional >> environment. > > Well Lah de Dah. May I remind everyone that the purpose of this > forum is NOT Motorola Bashing. PIC, Atmel, and 8051 lovers, I'm > sure you can find your own list where you can extol the virtues > of your chosen hardware somewhere else. I stand by my statements. I think Darrell's reading of my reply was inaccurate as his reply seems to be aimed at me. I'm not "bashing" anything other than the closed minds who won't so much as look at the competition for their pet solutions. Root for your favorite sports team all you want. Decorate the wall of your office cubical with team posters, wallpaper/screen blanker on your computer. But that attitude has no place in your professional work. Your job is to keep quality high and cost low. Thats a pretty broad brush to paint with. There is no excuse for bending over backwards to make a particular component fit in a design "just because you like it." -- David Kelly N4HHE, ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. |