Which compiler ? - Richard Souter - Mar 8 15:20:41 2008
Hi Folks,
Sorry not posted much but have found most of the questions I wonder
about through searches so did not want to bother the group ... And
could not answer much due to being new to the Oopic :)
However after following recent discussions I feel I need to ask a
question.
I've been mainly concentrating on the building and 'higher level'
functions of my first robot ( details at http://www.trikky2.com ) but
have been slowly adding more to the programming of the Oopic.
In its development I can see using many of the functions available on
the Oopic 'R' and am starting to look into more event fired routines.
Slightly confused now ( nothng new there :) ) ... Just wondering if I
would be better off with an earlier version of the compiler, I'm
using Version 6.1.1 ?
Basically I think I would prefer a version that I knew ALL the
functions worked 100% rather than a version that provided more
functions ... But not all 100%.
Sorry, new to this and was just wondering.
All the best.
Richard

(You need to be a member of oopic -- send a blank email to oopic-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Which compiler ? - ooPIC Tech Support - Mar 9 21:17:37 2008
I think that the V.6 compiler is a step up from the V.5, and the only
one that can handle the C1.1+ parts. Of course, while fixing the bugs
in the V.5 compiler, new ones were introduced into the V.6 one. Like
the one with oEvent. A few others have been mentioned.
DLC
Richard Souter wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Sorry not posted much but have found most of the questions I wonder
> about through searches so did not want to bother the group ... And
> could not answer much due to being new to the Oopic :)
>
> However after following recent discussions I feel I need to ask a
> question.
>
> I've been mainly concentrating on the building and 'higher level'
> functions of my first robot ( details at http://www.trikky2.com ) but
> have been slowly adding more to the programming of the Oopic.
>
> In its development I can see using many of the functions available on
> the Oopic 'R' and am starting to look into more event fired routines.
>
> Slightly confused now ( nothng new there :) ) ... Just wondering if I
> would be better off with an earlier version of the compiler, I'm
> using Version 6.1.1 ?
>
> Basically I think I would prefer a version that I knew ALL the
> functions worked 100% rather than a version that provided more
> functions ... But not all 100%.
>
> Sorry, new to this and was just wondering.
>
> All the best.
>
> Richard
>
>
>

(You need to be a member of oopic -- send a blank email to oopic-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Which compiler ? - Richard - Mar 10 8:01:40 2008
Thanks, will stick with the v6.1.1 :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "ooPIC Tech Support"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: [oopic] Which compiler ?
>I think that the V.6 compiler is a step up from the V.5, and the only
> one that can handle the C1.1+ parts. Of course, while fixing the bugs
> in the V.5 compiler, new ones were introduced into the V.6 one. Like
> the one with oEvent. A few others have been mentioned.
>
> DLC
>
> Richard Souter wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Sorry not posted much but have found most of the questions I wonder
>> about through searches so did not want to bother the group ... And
>> could not answer much due to being new to the Oopic :)
>>
>> However after following recent discussions I feel I need to ask a
>> question.
>>
>> I've been mainly concentrating on the building and 'higher level'
>> functions of my first robot ( details at http://www.trikky2.com ) but
>> have been slowly adding more to the programming of the Oopic.
>>
>> In its development I can see using many of the functions available on
>> the Oopic 'R' and am starting to look into more event fired routines.
>>
>> Slightly confused now ( nothng new there :) ) ... Just wondering if I
>> would be better off with an earlier version of the compiler, I'm
>> using Version 6.1.1 ?
>>
>> Basically I think I would prefer a version that I knew ALL the
>> functions worked 100% rather than a version that provided more
>> functions ... But not all 100%.
>>
>> Sorry, new to this and was just wondering.
>>
>> All the best.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>

(You need to be a member of oopic -- send a blank email to oopic-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )