Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search piclist



Search tips

Subscribe to piclist



piclist by Keywords

12F675 | 16F628 | 16F84 | 16f877 | 16F877A | 16F88 | 18F458 | ADC | AVR | Bootloader | CAN | CCS | CRC | EAGLE | EEPROM | ICD | ICSP | IDE | JDM | LED | Macros | Microchip | MPLAB | PCB-CAD | PIC10F | Pic12f675 | PIC16F84 | PIC16F84A | PIC16F877 | PIC18 | PIC18F452 | PicBasic | PICC | PICSTART | PWM | RS-485 | RS232 | SMT | SPI | UART | USART | USB | Wireless | Wisp628 | Xilinx

Ads

Discussion Groups

See Also

DSPFPGAElectronics

Discussion Groups | Piclist | BASIC advice...

A discussion group for the PICMicro microcontroller. Also called the Microchip PIC, this list is dedicated to the use and abuse of this fine, simple, microcontroller. Close to topic posts are welcome, ie. general electronics.

BASIC advice... - clayforge - Sep 4 19:50:00 2003

I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify the
purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
advice, and suggestions!

Scott




(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )


Re: BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 5 2:57:00 2003


When you did your search for pic basics where did you look?

CH Flash Basic is a very basic system with a dificult front end and
very limited pic support. What happens when you want to program for
the 18 series?

Pbpro is not bad but old hat now its been years since any decent
upgrades have been added.

If you want the ultimate in Pic Basics you have to go for Proton+
http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php

The feature least for the product is to big to list here. but for
starters

8 16 and 32 bit vars
Floating point support (proper)
Glcd support
Proper data handling

Tim --- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify
the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott


______________________________
controlSUITE™ software. Comprehensive. Intuitive. Optimized.
Real-world software for real-time control. Details Here!


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - sergio masci - Sep 5 8:31:00 2003

Hi Scott,

Have you seen the XCSB compiler at http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB ?

Regards
Sergio Masci ----- Original Message -----
From: clayforge <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:50 AM
Subject: [piclist] BASIC advice... > I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott




(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 5 14:01:00 2003


Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a cocked
hat.

http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php

No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device support.
Its a good price too £125.

Tim

--- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify
the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott




(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 5 14:15:00 2003

Scott

Don't forget to Look at Proton+

http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php

Tim

--- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify
the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott



(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 5 14:19:00 2003


As I have been unable to post a reply to the original message. I
will try here. Scott

Have a look at Proton+
http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php

Tim



(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice...sorry - xob_jt - Sep 5 18:09:00 2003

Very Very sorry for the multiple posts. Every body

Tim --- In , "xob_jt" <tim@t...> wrote:
>
> Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a cocked
> hat.
>
> http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php
>
> No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device support.
> Its a good price too £125.
>
> Tim >
>
> --- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> > I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> > PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> > Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will
work
> > with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's,
so
> > that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify
> the
> > purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering
that
> > Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> > advice, and suggestions!
> >
> > Scott

______________________________
controlSUITE™ software. Comprehensive. Intuitive. Optimized.
Real-world software for real-time control. Details Here!


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - martin de lange - Sep 6 1:43:00 2003

Hi
 
I tried installing the Proton std and Proton+ with XP but only the installer runs and then nothing.  Has anyone had this happen?
 
regards
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: xob_jt
To: p...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 7:01 AM
Subject: [piclist] Re: BASIC advice...


Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a cocked
hat.

http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php

No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device support.
Its a good price too £125.

Tim

--- In p...@yahoogroups.com, "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs.  I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic.  While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue.  Is there ANYTHING that would justify
the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash?  Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott



to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - Cliff - Sep 6 11:35:00 2003

I have PicBasic Pro, and have been using it off and on for a few
years, and have recently downloaded the trial version of CH Flash.
Here are my 2 bits, in a nutshell: the CH Flash compiler doesn't
match the professional useability or maturaty of the PicBAsic Pro
compiler. You get what you pay for. CHF is good if you want to learn
PIC assembly. PBP is good if you want to develop useable PIC code.

More details: The CHF compiler is not too user friendly, and the
online help manual is (even) much worse than the PBP manual. An
online search for CHF sample programs results in VERY few resources,
with only 17 basic examples on their own web site. PBP help is
abundant--including probably over 100 programs just on the MELabs
site. (By the way, I bought mine from www.rentron.com ...bruce has
ALWAYS been very helpful with excellent tech support, and you might
find a slightly cheaper site, but I doubt you'll find better
support.) There is also a PBP email list that is far more active than
this group.

CHF has crashed on me at least three times in the first half hour I
used it. It also hangs regularly with XP. CHF is designed more for
learning assembler, and isn't user friendly when it comes to actually
entering in the program--you have to click buttons instead of typing
in the command, and often the dialog boxes that pop up aren't
explained well in the help. Some have complained that PBP requires a
third party editer. To that, I say--SO WHAT!!! Using the free
MicroCode Studio, you can't tell they aren't just one program. The MC
Studio Plus is even better, with great debugging capabilities. MCS
and MCS+ both have context sensitive highlighting and coloring of
text. They also allow you to quick jump to a variable declaration or
a label, which is handy in large programs.

While it's true that CHF has procedures and allows you to pass
values...if you look at the code produced, you can do it manually
with PBP. (i.e. instead of CHF's "Call Procedure_1 (x, y)", you use
three lines that amount to "Proc_1_A = X : Proc_1_B = Y : Gosub
Procedure_1") The compiled code is nearly identical. Also, CHF has
float capability. PBP does, too...but you have to port in some
assembly code to do so...and the samples are on their web site.

The bottom line: If you need to save money, and want to learn
assembly for PIC's, and don't mind spending extra time, go with the
CHF. If you want to get programming quickly with compact and robust
code, regular (and useful) upgrades at reasonable prices ($10), go
with PicBasic Pro.

Cliff --- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to program
> PICs. I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
> Horizons CH Flash Basic. While I know that PicBasic Pro will work
> with more types of chips, I will really only be using the 16's, so
> that is not a real issue. Is there ANYTHING that would justify the
> purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering that
> Pro costs more than double the CH Flash? Thanks for all input,
> advice, and suggestions!
>
> Scott




(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - sergio masci - Sep 7 9:18:00 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: Cliff <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 5:35 PM
Subject: [piclist] Re: BASIC advice... > I have PicBasic Pro, and have been using it off and on for a few
> years, and have recently downloaded the trial version of CH Flash.
> Here are my 2 bits, in a nutshell: the CH Flash compiler doesn't
> match the professional useability or maturaty of the PicBAsic Pro
> compiler. You get what you pay for. CHF is good if you want to learn
> PIC assembly. PBP is good if you want to develop useable PIC code.
>
> More details: The CHF compiler is not too user friendly, and the
> online help manual is (even) much worse than the PBP manual. An
> online search for CHF sample programs results in VERY few resources,
> with only 17 basic examples on their own web site. PBP help is
> abundant--including probably over 100 programs just on the MELabs
> site. (By the way, I bought mine from www.rentron.com ...bruce has
> ALWAYS been very helpful with excellent tech support, and you might
> find a slightly cheaper site, but I doubt you'll find better
> support.) There is also a PBP email list that is far more active than
> this group.
>
> CHF has crashed on me at least three times in the first half hour I
> used it. It also hangs regularly with XP. CHF is designed more for
> learning assembler, and isn't user friendly when it comes to actually
> entering in the program--you have to click buttons instead of typing
> in the command, and often the dialog boxes that pop up aren't
> explained well in the help. Some have complained that PBP requires a
> third party editer. To that, I say--SO WHAT!!! Using the free
> MicroCode Studio, you can't tell they aren't just one program. The MC
> Studio Plus is even better, with great debugging capabilities. MCS
> and MCS+ both have context sensitive highlighting and coloring of
> text. They also allow you to quick jump to a variable declaration or
> a label, which is handy in large programs.
>
> While it's true that CHF has procedures and allows you to pass
> values...if you look at the code produced, you can do it manually
> with PBP. (i.e. instead of CHF's "Call Procedure_1 (x, y)", you use
> three lines that amount to "Proc_1_A = X : Proc_1_B = Y : Gosub
> Procedure_1") The compiled code is nearly identical. Also, CHF has
> float capability. PBP does, too...but you have to port in some
> assembly code to do so...and the samples are on their web site.

The point is not weather you can get past the limitations of a language
using a different language, it is not even about how clever or lazy the
programmer is. The point is that humans doing a repetitive task are prone to
error. The computer does not get tired or distracted, it does not take short
cuts of feel down. It does what it is told from start to finish no mater how
stupid or menial the task. A good language and compiler will offload the
work from the programmer to the computer letting the programmer get on with
his/her main objective: to understand the problem and describe it as a
program.

By defining a function calling protocol within the language you are allowing
the compiler to take more of the burden from the programmer, you are
allowing the compiler to better understand the interaction between
statements within your program and ultimately to produce faster more compact
error free code.

Consider the situation where you run out of RAM during program development
and you decide to share a variable between different sections of your
program. Would it not be better to have the compiler check that this is safe
after every change you make to your program. Better still, how about
letting the compiler check your program and let it decide which variables
are safe to re-use and where.

consider the following section of code

proc output_high(int bit_number)
PORTB = PORTB | (1 << bit_number)
endproc

proc output_low(int bit_number)
PORTB = PORTB & ~(1 << bit_number)
endproc

proc main()
output_high(0)
output_low(0)
output_high(0)
output_low(0)
endproc

This compiles to just 4 (four) machine code instructions using the XCSB
compiler, and the programmer did not have to worry about fancy optimisations
or obscuring the meaning by writing extra code or pre-processing the program
in his head to embed strange constants into the code. And the greatest
benefit of all is that you can turn sections of code (like this) into
libraries which you can use over and over in different projects and the
compiler will do all the work of checking it and optimising it each and
every time you compile it.

Yes you get what you pay for, but sometimes the payment takes the form of
learning.

Regards
Sergio Masci

http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB - optimising structured PIC BASIC compiler



(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - Author Unknown - Sep 7 12:31:00 2003

In a message dated 9/7/2003 7:29:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, t...@tjbsystems.com writes:
Lastly ask a Pbro user when the last feature upgread was? 1 may be 2
years? Proton+ is constantly upgreaded. Les who writes the compiler
does every thing the code and the Parser so in a lot of cases a
request is made on the Friday and I have the Beta on Monday.
Unfortuatly with Pbpro it's not like that, which is why upgreads are
so few and far between.

Tim
Tim,
I  am just starting in PICS as an extention to my hobby (Model Railroading). I have been toying with the idea of getting Pic Basic. However from your description above Proton seems to be the better deal! Where can it be purchased? Is there a trial version any where that I might take a test drive before buying it? How much does it cost?
Thanks in advance! 
 
Ray Russell
NMRA-40609
General Contractor
Norfolk & Western Railroad
Pocahontas Division
Circa 1958
Visit The "NEW" Pocahontas Website at:
Click here: N & W Pocahontas Division
http://members.aol.com/rruss45826/public_html/index.html

OR
Click here: Pocahontas Home
for the old website!
http://milliron.home.sprynet.com/Pocahontas/Pocahontas1.htm


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - clayforge - Sep 7 15:35:00 2003

Does Protom+ have Xin or Xout commands, to use PICs with X10
devices? A few of my ideas involve that. I know PBPro does...

Thanks,

Scott

--- In , "xob_jt" <tim@t...> wrote:
>
> Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a cocked
> hat.
>
> http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php
>
> No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device support.
> Its a good price too £125.






(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - Mike W - Sep 7 15:57:00 2003

On 7 Sep 03, at 20:35, clayforge wrote:

> Does Protom+ have Xin or Xout commands, to use PICs with X10
> devices? A few of my ideas involve that. I know PBPro does...
>
While on this topic, I know PBPro is now available in a crippled
version for appraisal/ hobby use. How seriously is it crippled and in
what way?.
Mike W


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 7 16:59:00 2003


Hello Scott

Yes XIN and XOUT is supported a v small snippet from the manual XIN

Syntax
XIN DataPin , ZeroPin , {Timeout , Timeout Label} , [Variable{,...}]

Overview
Receive X-10 data and store the House Code and Key Code in a
variable.

Tim
--- In , "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
> Does Protom+ have Xin or Xout commands, to use PICs with X10
> devices? A few of my ideas involve that. I know PBPro does...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> --- In , "xob_jt" <tim@t...> wrote:
> >
> > Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a
cocked
> > hat.
> >
> > http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php
> >
> > No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device
support.
> > Its a good price too £125.
>



(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: BASIC advice... - xob_jt - Sep 7 17:06:00 2003


Mike

Pbpro is available (only recently) with a 31 line limit

Proton+ is available with a 35 line limit

Hope that helps

Tim

--- In , "Mike W" <mike@c...> wrote:
> On 7 Sep 03, at 20:35, clayforge wrote:
>
> > Does Protom+ have Xin or Xout commands, to use PICs with X10
> > devices? A few of my ideas involve that. I know PBPro does...
> >
> While on this topic, I know PBPro is now available in a crippled
> version for appraisal/ hobby use. How seriously is it crippled and
in
> what way?.
> Mike W



(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - martin de lange - Sep 8 6:52:00 2003

Hi Tim
 
I am still having no luck with installing either of the demos on XP home.
The installer runs and then nothing - not even an error message.  Using the admin logon with all rights.  Have not had any problems with installing other software.  Rebooted and checked everything I could. Switched anti virus off but still nothing.
 
One more thing as you seem to be somehow connected with the company.  I had a look at the website as well and the product - is it all about slating other similar products as this is certainly the message myself and I am sure many others are getting.  On the site the slating is even worse than on this site.  I have been commercially programming pics for ages but have found a need to do protos quicker and Proton seems my way out.  It looks like a good product. I am just concerned about what I have seen.
 
Any ideas?
 
regards
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: xob_jt
To: p...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: [piclist] Re: BASIC advice...


Martin

I run the full version under XP and have also instaled the Demo
under XP. I have also just re-instaled it to ensure it's OK and it
all worked.

Try again. You will not be sorry! Don't forget to spend some time
looking at the help file you really cannot appreciate the full power
of the compiler with out checking it out.

If you still have trouble contact me and I will do my utmost to sort
it.

Tim--- In p...@yahoogroups.com, "martin de lange" <de_lange@x> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried installing the Proton std and Proton+ with XP but only the
installer runs and then nothing.  Has anyone had this happen?
>
> regards
> Martin
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: xob_jt
>   To: p...@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 7:01 AM
>   Subject: [piclist] Re: BASIC advice...>
>   Have you Looked at Proton+ it knocks all picbasic's into a
cocked
>   hat.
>
>   http://www.crownhill.co.uk/proton_comparison.php
>
>   No other basic comes near it for funtionality and device
support.
>   Its a good price too £125.
>
>   Tim>
>
>   --- In p...@yahoogroups.com, "clayforge" <festave@t...> wrote:
>   > I am looking for input on which BASIC compiler to get to
program
>   > PICs.  I have it narrowed down to PicBASIC Pro, and Celestial
>   > Horizons CH Flash Basic.  While I know that PicBasic Pro will
work
>   > with more types of chips, I will really only be using the
16's, so
>   > that is not a real issue.  Is there ANYTHING that would
justify
>   the
>   > purchase of PicBasic Pro over the CH Flash Basic, considering
that
>   > Pro costs more than double the CH Flash?  Thanks for all
input,
>   > advice, and suggestions!
>   >
>   > Scott>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>             
>       
>       
>
>   to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the
instructions
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.



to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - Author Unknown - Sep 8 9:22:00 2003

In a message dated 9/8/2003 9:15:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time, t...@tjbsystems.com writes:
As for my connection with the company. My connection is only that I
am an unpaid Beta tester. I was an avid user of PBpro and
contributed a lot the list they use. Look for "instant interrupts"
WOW!
1 new guy asks for help and advice on a getting started with PICS and I start a war!
Come on Guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Ray Russell
NMRA-40609
General Contractor
Norfolk & Western Railroad
Pocahontas Division
Circa 1958
Visit The "NEW" Pocahontas Website at:
Click here: N & W Pocahontas Division
OR
Click here: Pocahontas Home
for the old website!
http://milliron.home.sprynet.com/Pocahontas/Pocahontas1.htm


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - Author Unknown - Sep 8 12:11:00 2003

In a message dated 9/8/2003 12:48:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, s...@xcprod.com writes:
War? Have I missed somthing? All I see is a passionate exchange.

The way I see it, this kind of exchange helps newbies (and even
stale programmers) to see what the failings of a product are and
what alternatives exist. I do not see it as a bad thing if a
discussion that highlights the short commmings of a product forces
that product to evolve.
Maybe you have to look at it from my point of view! I am so new 3/4's of what you just went back and forth on meant nothing to me! To me at this point a Lay Person as far as PICS go it would seem that the software that is used to program PICS is as buggy or worse  then Gates stuff. Since I do not really understand what is going on it seems to me that when I pick one of these products I am going to alienate a large portion of this group who might otherwise help me. Kinda leves you wondering if you (I) should bother. Remember for me it is a hobby not a source of income!
 
Ray Russell
NMRA-40609
General Contractor
Norfolk & Western Railroad
Pocahontas Division
Circa 1958
Visit The "NEW" Pocahontas Website at:
Click here: N & W Pocahontas Division
OR
Click here: Pocahontas Home
for the old website!
http://milliron.home.sprynet.com/Pocahontas/Pocahontas1.htm
______________________________
controlSUITE™ software. Comprehensive. Intuitive. Optimized.
Real-world software for real-time control. Details Here!


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - Author Unknown - Sep 8 14:19:00 2003

Tim,
I downloaded the Proton+ demo. Is there a document some where that lists the proper syntax for all it's commands?
 
Ray Russell
NMRA-40609
General Contractor
Norfolk & Western Railroad
Pocahontas Division
Circa 1958
Visit The "NEW" Pocahontas Website at:
Click here: N & W Pocahontas Division
OR
Click here: Pocahontas Home
for the old website!
http://milliron.home.sprynet.com/Pocahontas/Pocahontas1.htm
______________________________
controlSUITE™ software. Comprehensive. Intuitive. Optimized.
Real-world software for real-time control. Details Here!


(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: BASIC advice... - hogmail - Sep 10 21:34:00 2003

Ray, I need that link to a command syntax for  proton!  thanks Lloyd
----- Original Message -----
From: xob_jt
To: p...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: [piclist] Re: BASIC advice...


Ray

Instal the demo, then from the editor open the help file.

If that is not what you want to do I can send you the help file
direct.

Tim

--- In p...@yahoogroups.com, rruss45826@a... wrote:
> Tim,
> I downloaded the Proton+ demo. Is there a document some where that
lists the
> proper syntax for all it's commands?
>
> Ray Russell
> NMRA-40609
> General Contractor
> Norfolk & Western Railroad
> Pocahontas Division
> Circa 1958
> Visit The "NEW" Pocahontas Website at:
> Click here: N & W Pocahontas Division
> OR
> Click here: Pocahontas Home
> for the old website!
> http://milliron.home.sprynet.com/Pocahontas/Pocahontas1.htm



to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )