Sign in
Search piclist
Subscribe to piclist
piclist by Keywords
12F675 | 16F628 | 16F84 | 16f877 | 16F877A | 16F88 | 18F458 | ADC | AVR | Bootloader | CAN | CCS | CRC | EAGLE | EEPROM | ICD | ICSP | IDE | JDM | LED | Macros | Microchip | MPLAB | PCB-CAD | PIC10F | Pic12f675 | PIC16F84 | PIC16F84A | PIC16F877 | PIC18 | PIC18F452 | PicBasic | PICC | PICSTART | PWM | RS-485 | RS232 | SMT | SPI | UART | USART | USB | Wireless | Wisp628 | Xilinx
Ads
Discussion Groups
See Also
Discussion Groups | Piclist | 16F628 in-circuit programming problem
A discussion group for the PICMicro microcontroller. Also called the Microchip PIC, this list is dedicated to the use and abuse of this fine, simple, microcontroller. Close to topic posts are welcome, ie. general electronics.
16F628 in-circuit programming problem - leon_heller - Feb 13 18:24:00 2005
|
This is a weird one! I've added connections for in-circuit programming to my JDM programmer, and it works OK with a 16F88 on the target board. However, when I try to program a 16F628 on the same target board programming fails on the first location. The chip programs OK when plugged into the socket on the programmer. I've got RB4 (pin 10) tied low on the target board, as on the programmer. I'm using IC-Prog. Has anyone got any suggestions? Leon |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - upand_at_them - Feb 13 21:27:00 2005
|
I'd like to know too, because I've never been able to ICSP a 16F628 with the PG-2C. In fact, even using the on-board socket I've found the PG-2C to be unreliable. Mike --- In , "leon_heller" <leon.heller@d...> wrote: > > This is a weird one! I've added connections for in-circuit > programming to my JDM programmer, and it works OK with a 16F88 on the > target board. However, when I try to program a 16F628 on the same > target board programming fails on the first location. The chip > programs OK when plugged into the socket on the programmer. I've got > RB4 (pin 10) tied low on the target board, as on the programmer. I'm > using IC-Prog. > > Has anyone got any suggestions? > > Leon |
Stellaris® MCU Family: New Parts, New Package, New Price.
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - leon_heller - Feb 14 5:41:00 2005
|
--- In , "upand_at_them" <upand_at_them@y...> wrote: > > I'd like to know too, because I've never been able to ICSP a 16F628 > with the PG-2C. In fact, even using the on-board socket I've found > the PG-2C to be unreliable. I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you contacted them about the problem? I've just managed to program a different '628 with ICSP, but it only worked once! I've tried using an external supply and that doesn't work either. Now, I can't get a '628 to program in the socket either! The '88 is still OK, though. I think I'll try a different programmer. Leon |
Stellaris® MCU Family: New Parts, New Package, New Price.
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - upand_at_them - Feb 14 9:20:00 2005
|
> I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as > the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you contacted > them about the problem? Olimex makes it. Spark Fun is just a distributor. I guess I should know better than to expect too much from a $10 programmer. > I think I'll try a different programmer. Me too. Do you know about the Wisp628? It does ICSP and I have heard a lot of good things about it. Mike |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Leon Heller - Feb 14 9:37:00 2005
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "upand_at_them" <> To: <> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:20 PM Subject: [piclist] Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem > > >> I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as >> the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you contacted >> them about the problem? > > Olimex makes it. Spark Fun is just a distributor. I guess I should > know better than to expect too much from a $10 programmer. > >> I think I'll try a different programmer. > > Me too. Do you know about the Wisp628? It does ICSP and I have > heard a lot of good things about it. That's what I'll use. I ordered a programmed '628 from Wouter which I've got somewhere. I was intending to design and make a PCB for it. I just tried a '628 in the JDM programmer socket, and it's working again. I really need ICSP, because I've got surface mount '627s I want to use. Leon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 10/02/2005 |
Stellaris® MCU Family: New Parts, New Package, New Price.
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Jeff Galinat - Feb 14 9:46:00 2005
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "upand_at_them" <> To: <> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 8:20 AM Subject: [piclist] Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem > > >> I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as >> the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you contacted >> them about the problem? > > Olimex makes it. Spark Fun is just a distributor. I guess I should > know better than to expect too much from a $10 programmer. > >> I think I'll try a different programmer. > > Me too. Do you know about the Wisp628? It does ICSP and I have > heard a lot of good things about it. > > Mike > Hi, Re: the Olimex PG2C I found this info from Peter H. Anderson who teaches Embedded contollers at Morgan State University,in Baltimore Marland. It is info from one of his PG2C auctions: "The latest units I received from Olimex (PG2C) have an added six terminal connector for In Circuit Serial Programming (ICSP). I caution against using this to connect to external circuitry. Rather, use the on-board sockets for programming. I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally -8 VDC, is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the ICSP connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to ground will cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to ground. The programmer will not work. In summary, Olimex has added an ICSP connector, but I question its utility. Use the sockets on the programmer." I just figured that I would pass this along. Jeff Galinat |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - jgalinat2004 - Feb 14 10:37:00 2005
|
--- In , "leon_heller" <leon.heller@d...> wrote: > > --- In , "upand_at_them" <upand_at_them@y...> > wrote: > > > > I'd like to know too, because I've never been able to ICSP a 16F628 > > with the PG-2C. In fact, even using the on-board socket I've found > > the PG-2C to be unreliable. > > I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as > the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you contacted > them about the problem? > > I've just managed to program a different '628 with ICSP, but it only > worked once! I've tried using an external supply and that doesn't > work either. Now, I can't get a '628 to program in the socket either! > The '88 is still OK, though. > > I think I'll try a different programmer. > > Leon Hi, Re: the Olimex PG2C I found this info from Peter H. Anderson who teaches Embedded contollers at Morgan State University,in Baltimore Marland. It is info from one of his PG2C auctions: "The latest units I received from Olimex (PG2C) have an added six terminal connector for In Circuit Serial Programming (ICSP). I caution against using this to connect to external circuitry. Rather, use the on-board sockets for programming. I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally -8 VDC, is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the ICSP connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to ground will cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to ground. The programmer will not work. In summary, Olimex has added an ICSP connector, but I question its utility. Use the sockets on the programmer." I just figured that I would pass this along. Jeff Galinat |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Leon Heller - Feb 14 12:12:00 2005
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "jgalinat2004" <> To: <> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:37 PM Subject: [piclist] Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem > > > --- In , "leon_heller" <leon.heller@d...> > wrote: >> >> --- In , "upand_at_them" > <upand_at_them@y...> >> wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to know too, because I've never been able to ICSP a > 16F628 >> > with the PG-2C. In fact, even using the on-board socket I've > found >> > the PG-2C to be unreliable. >> >> I see the PG2C is made by Spark Fun, and is apparently the same as >> the JDM. They use the '628 in their ICSP example, have you > contacted >> them about the problem? >> >> I've just managed to program a different '628 with ICSP, but it > only >> worked once! I've tried using an external supply and that doesn't >> work either. Now, I can't get a '628 to program in the socket > either! >> The '88 is still OK, though. >> >> I think I'll try a different programmer. >> >> Leon > Hi, > Re: the Olimex PG2C I found this info from Peter H. Anderson who > teaches > Embedded contollers at Morgan State University,in Baltimore Marland. > It is > info from one of his PG2C auctions: > "The latest units I received from Olimex (PG2C) have an added six > terminal > connector for In Circuit Serial Programming (ICSP). I caution against > using > this to connect to external circuitry. Rather, use the on-board > sockets for > programming. > > I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally -8 > VDC, > is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the > programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the > ICSP > connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to ground > will > cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to ground. The > programmer will not work. > > In summary, Olimex has added an ICSP connector, but I question its > utility. > Use the sockets on the programmer." > > I just figured that I would pass this along. Thanks, Jeff. I have my target board powered off the ICSP connector, that *should* be OK, but I still have problems with the '628 Leon. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 10/02/2005 |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Vasile Surducan - Feb 15 7:03:00 2005
|
--- In , "jgalinat2004" <jgalinat@o...> wrote: > Hi, > Re: the Olimex PG2C I found this info from Peter H. Anderson who > teaches > Embedded contollers at Morgan State University,in Baltimore Marland. > It is > info from one of his PG2C auctions: > "The latest units I received from Olimex (PG2C) have an added six > terminal > connector for In Circuit Serial Programming (ICSP). I caution against > using > this to connect to external circuitry. Rather, use the on-board > sockets for > programming. > > I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally - 8 > VDC, > is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the > programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the > ICSP > connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to ground > will > cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to ground. The > programmer will not work. Such remark comming from a teacher makes me at least to smile. The programmer in discution is not a debugger nor a developing board which is permanently connected to a computer port. The user application ground have nothing to do with the computer ground. It might be connected to any potential comming from the RS232 lines from the computer. This is the principle of the JDM programmer. Any potential of the COM port (positive or negative) may be connected with the users PCB application ground as long as the ground line of the COM port is not connected also with the user PCB ground (which means short circuit). And of course in JDM or PG2C programmer this short circuit is not connected, only if the user is trying to communicate with the PC while is programming the PIC (crazy thing, attention please the thing is crazy, not other person!) Leon, the JDM ICSP problem is produced by the very small programming current (and sensitive voltage level of VPP) achieved from the port. If all other consumers on the application board are not carefully isolated from the ICSP lines, the programming verification sequence will return error. That's why some PIC's may be programmed and others may not. I do not have nothing in common with Olimex products, I do not use Olimex products even I see the capitalist world like cheap things. :) best regards, Vasile |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Leon Heller - Feb 15 7:46:00 2005
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vasile Surducan" <> To: <> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:03 AM Subject: [piclist] Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem > > > --- In , "jgalinat2004" <jgalinat@o...> wrote: >> Hi, >> Re: the Olimex PG2C I found this info from Peter H. Anderson who >> teaches >> Embedded contollers at Morgan State University,in Baltimore > Marland. >> It is >> info from one of his PG2C auctions: >> "The latest units I received from Olimex (PG2C) have an added six >> terminal >> connector for In Circuit Serial Programming (ICSP). I caution > against >> using >> this to connect to external circuitry. Rather, use the on-board >> sockets for >> programming. >> >> I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally - > 8 >> VDC, >> is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the >> programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the >> ICSP >> connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to > ground >> will >> cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to ground. > The >> programmer will not work. > Such remark comming from a teacher makes me at least to smile. The > programmer in discution is not a debugger nor a developing board > which is permanently connected to a computer port. > The user application ground have nothing to do with the computer > ground. It might be connected to any potential comming from the RS232 > lines from the computer. This is the principle of the JDM programmer. > Any potential of the COM port (positive or negative) may be connected > with the users PCB application ground as long as the ground line of > the COM port is not connected also with the user PCB ground (which > means short circuit). And of course in JDM or PG2C programmer this > short circuit is not connected, only if the user is trying to > communicate with the PC while is programming the PIC (crazy thing, > attention please the thing is crazy, not other person!) > Leon, the JDM ICSP problem is produced by the very small programming > current (and sensitive voltage level of VPP) achieved from the port. > If all other consumers on the application board are not carefully > isolated from the ICSP lines, the programming verification sequence > will return error. That's why some PIC's may be programmed and others > may not. I was beginning to think it must be something like that. Leon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005 |
Stellaris® MCU Family: New Parts, New Package, New Price.
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Dwayne Reid - Feb 15 13:48:00 2005
|
At 04:03 AM 2/15/2005, Vasile Surducan wrote: > > > > I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally > > -8 VDC, > > is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the > > programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the > > ICSP connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to > > ground will cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to > ground. > > The programmer will not work. > > Such remark comming from a teacher makes me at least to smile. The >programmer in discution is not a debugger nor a developing board >which is permanently connected to a computer port. >The user application ground have nothing to do with the computer >ground. It might be connected to any potential comming from the RS232 >lines from the computer. Actually, I suspect he speaks from direct experience. If a person is using ICSP while developing a project, that person probably has test equipment connected to the circuit. A grounded scope probe is all that it takes to make the programmer fail to work. I don't know about you, but I generally have a large number of devices connected to my prototype circuits. There is usually always a scope hooked up (may be just the ground lead most of the time - I tend to use a scope instead of a multi-meter), many of my circuits use a serial port (also grounded via the PC it is connected to), etc. Trying to use a JDM programmer in-circuit on those projects will not work. Finally, keep in mind that his normal audience are college students. They don't have the benefit of years of experience and might have a very hard time figuring out why the chip isn't programming. Quite frankly, students simply don't need that kind of aggravation. dwayne -- Dwayne Reid <> Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA (780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax Celebrating 20 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 2004) .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .- `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address. This message neither grants consent to receive unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial email. |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: 16F628 in-circuit programming problem - Vasile Surducan - Feb 16 10:21:00 2005
|
--- In , Dwayne Reid <dwayner@p...> wrote: > At 04:03 AM 2/15/2005, Vasile Surducan wrote: > > > > > > I offer caution as the negative rail of the PC Com Port, nominally > > > -8 VDC, > > > is used as ground on the programmer and this is fine so long as the > > > programmer is isolated from other circuitry. However, in using the > > > ICSP connector to wire to a PIC in a circuit that is referenced to > > > ground will cause the PC Com port's negative rail to be connected to > > ground. > > > The programmer will not work. > > > > Such remark comming from a teacher makes me at least to smile. The > >programmer in discution is not a debugger nor a developing board > >which is permanently connected to a computer port. > >The user application ground have nothing to do with the computer > >ground. It might be connected to any potential comming from the RS232 > >lines from the computer. > > Actually, I suspect he speaks from direct experience. If a person is using > ICSP while developing a project, that person probably has test equipment > connected to the circuit. A grounded scope probe is all that it takes to > make the programmer fail to work. > > I don't know about you, but I generally have a large number of devices > connected to my prototype circuits. There is usually always a scope hooked > up (may be just the ground lead most of the time - I tend to use a scope > instead of a multi-meter), many of my circuits use a serial port (also > grounded via the PC it is connected to), etc. Trying to use a JDM > programmer in-circuit on those projects will not work. > > Finally, keep in mind that his normal audience are college students. They > don't have the benefit of years of experience and might have a very hard > time figuring out why the chip isn't programming. Quite frankly, students > simply don't need that kind of aggravation. Dwayne, like usually you have (partially) right. However just try to remind you that you're already on the mined field when trying to program a PIC soldered on a board with your scope probe ground connected to the board's ground. Immagine just that your scope is plugged on other mains phase than your computer. It's a simple thing which any student (remember: a future engineer) must know it. Like it must know that this was one reasons why Tektronics has developed the multi channel scope with isolated grounds. A student which is programming with JDM or other programmer chosen from the thousands, and doesn't know why is programming when is programming and when not, is not much happy than one who knows those things. A student which has no time to discover the problem becomes usually our boss. And then he will never have enough time. BTW, I have some projects where the PIC is floated on the mains, but I never tried an ICSP with 316 Vpp on it... After the mains is powered off and disconnected, programming works well. Just an example. So the conclusion is simple. Use the right programmer at the right place, student or old fox engineer. :) best regards, Vasile |
(You need to be a member of piclist -- send a blank email to piclist-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )