Sign in
Search rabbit-semi
Subscribe to rabbit-semi
Ads
Discussion Groups
Discussion Groups | Rabbit-Semi | Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21
This is a group for folks designing and programming embedded systems using the Rabbit Semiconductor C-programmable microcontroller. Rabbit Semi is a spin-off from Z-World who makes a variety of embedded modules and tools. This group is not affiliated with either Rabbit or Z-World, but is a user forum for sharing ideas, asking questions, flaunting knowledge, and other typical user group stuff. The Rabbit is a powerful uC, supported by a full-featured C-compiler.
Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - promolinux - Apr 15 17:42:39 2008
Scott, im migrating my project code from dynamic C 9.52 with cores
RCM3000 to dynamic C 10.21 with cores RCM4XXX.
Im using your sscanf.lib library. The new compiler complains:
line 217 : ERROR SSCANF.LIB : Invalid expression - need lvalue.
The code is:
while ((isspace(*line)==0) && (*line != 0))
*(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
Any idea?
TIA
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
RCM3000 to dynamic C 10.21 with cores RCM4XXX.
Im using your sscanf.lib library. The new compiler complains:
line 217 : ERROR SSCANF.LIB : Invalid expression - need lvalue.
The code is:
while ((isspace(*line)==0) && (*line != 0))
*(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
Any idea?
TIA
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - Scott Henion - Apr 15 17:55:52 2008
promolinux wrote:
> Scott, im migrating my project code from dynamic C 9.52 with cores
> RCM3000 to dynamic C 10.21 with cores RCM4XXX.
>
> Im using your sscanf.lib library. The new compiler complains:
>
> line 217 : ERROR SSCANF.LIB : Invalid expression - need lvalue.
>
> The code is:
> while ((isspace(*line)==0) && (*line != 0))
> *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>
> Any idea?
>
> TIA
>
> Donald.
>
Jeez, they still don't have a sscanf?
Download the latest, it will compile.
This is another bug in 10.x ;(
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
A clash of doctrine is not a disaster -- it is an opportunity.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> Scott, im migrating my project code from dynamic C 9.52 with cores
> RCM3000 to dynamic C 10.21 with cores RCM4XXX.
>
> Im using your sscanf.lib library. The new compiler complains:
>
> line 217 : ERROR SSCANF.LIB : Invalid expression - need lvalue.
>
> The code is:
> while ((isspace(*line)==0) && (*line != 0))
> *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>
> Any idea?
>
> TIA
>
> Donald.
>
Jeez, they still don't have a sscanf?
Download the latest, it will compile.
This is another bug in 10.x ;(
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
A clash of doctrine is not a disaster -- it is an opportunity.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - promolinux - Apr 15 18:31:00 2008
--- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion wrote:
> Jeez, they still don't have a sscanf?
Nope.
>
> Download the latest, it will compile.
Im using the latest file, downloaded from your website, creation date
8/06/2004. This is the latest?
> This is another bug in 10.x ;(
Seems like, yes.
TIA.
Donald .
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> Jeez, they still don't have a sscanf?
Nope.
>
> Download the latest, it will compile.
Im using the latest file, downloaded from your website, creation date
8/06/2004. This is the latest?
> This is another bug in 10.x ;(
Seems like, yes.
TIA.
Donald .
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - Scott Henion - Apr 15 19:47:08 2008
promolinux wrote:
>
>> Download the latest, it will compile.
>>
>
> Im using the latest file, downloaded from your website, creation date
> 8/06/2004. This is the latest?
>
I uploaded a new one today as soon as you posted the message.
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
When a girl marries she exchanges the attentions of many men for the
inattentions of one.
-- Helen Rowland
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
>
>> Download the latest, it will compile.
>>
>
> Im using the latest file, downloaded from your website, creation date
> 8/06/2004. This is the latest?
>
I uploaded a new one today as soon as you posted the message.
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
When a girl marries she exchanges the attentions of many men for the
inattentions of one.
-- Helen Rowland
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - promolinux - Apr 15 20:21:39 2008
--- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion wrote:
> I uploaded a new one today as soon as you posted the message.
Sorry, my mistake.
It compile now, thanks a lot.
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> I uploaded a new one today as soon as you posted the message.
Sorry, my mistake.
It compile now, thanks a lot.
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - Bill_CT - Apr 16 22:46:20 2008
--- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion wrote:
> > *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>
> Download the latest, it will compile.
What did you have to change (that you shouldn't have had to change)?
That was perfectly valid C code as is (was).
Bill
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> > *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>
> Download the latest, it will compile.
What did you have to change (that you shouldn't have had to change)?
That was perfectly valid C code as is (was).
Bill
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - Scott Henion - Apr 16 23:05:22 2008
Bill_CT wrote:
> --- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion wrote:
>
>>> *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>>>
>> Download the latest, it will compile.
>>
>
> What did you have to change (that you shouldn't have had to change)?
> That was perfectly valid C code as is (was).
>
>
Was:
*(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++;
Changed to:
char * s;
s=(char *)args[argcnt];
*s++=*line++;
It was valid code. Ugly, but valid.
I bet it was this part:
((char*)args[argcnt])++
basically (x)++ where x is not just a simple scalor but an array and a cast must be a bear to handle in the compiler.
It is ugly code I wrote for a pre-ANSI compiler back in 1988. Never thought I would reuse the code as it is so outdated. Today, I'd use ANSI variable arg list macros, but this is DC any you have to use 20 year old practices. ;)
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
The point is that descriptive writing is very rarely entirely accurate and
during the reign of Olaf Quimby II as Patrician of Ankh some legislation
was passed in a determined attempt to put a stop to this sort of thing and
introduce some honesty into reporting. Thus, if a legend said of a notable
here that "all men spoke of his prowess" any bard who valued his life would
add hastily "except for a couple of people in his home village who thought
he was a liar, and quite a lot of other people who had never really heard
of him."
-- (Terry Pratchett, The Light Fantastic)
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> --- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion
>
>>> *(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++; <--- ofending line
>>>
>> Download the latest, it will compile.
>>
>
> What did you have to change (that you shouldn't have had to change)?
> That was perfectly valid C code as is (was).
>
>
Was:
*(((char*)args[argcnt])++)=*line++;
Changed to:
char * s;
s=(char *)args[argcnt];
*s++=*line++;
It was valid code. Ugly, but valid.
I bet it was this part:
((char*)args[argcnt])++
basically (x)++ where x is not just a simple scalor but an array and a cast must be a bear to handle in the compiler.
It is ugly code I wrote for a pre-ANSI compiler back in 1988. Never thought I would reuse the code as it is so outdated. Today, I'd use ANSI variable arg list macros, but this is DC any you have to use 20 year old practices. ;)
--
------------------------------------------
| Scott G. Henion| s...@shdesigns.org |
| Consultant | Stone Mountain, GA |
| SHDesigns http://www.shdesigns.org |
------------------------------------------
Rabbit libs: http://www.shdesigns.org/rabbit/
today's fortune
The point is that descriptive writing is very rarely entirely accurate and
during the reign of Olaf Quimby II as Patrician of Ankh some legislation
was passed in a determined attempt to put a stop to this sort of thing and
introduce some honesty into reporting. Thus, if a legend said of a notable
here that "all men spoke of his prowess" any bard who valued his life would
add hastily "except for a couple of people in his home village who thought
he was a liar, and quite a lot of other people who had never really heard
of him."
-- (Terry Pratchett, The Light Fantastic)
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: Scanf library from shdesigns dont compile under Dynamic C V 10.21 - Donald Shimoda - May 16 9:24:49 2008
--- In r...@yahoogroups.com, Scott Henion wrote:
> It was valid code. Ugly, but valid.
>
Scot, i have bad news, the new version dont work as expected under
version 9.21 (i cannot test rigth now in version 10.xx, because i dont
will use RCM4XXX due to several reasons).
Example:
That line of code:
sscanf(datopc,"%s %s %s",param1,param2,param3);
with datopc = 'GET CLOCK'
in previous version returns:
param1 = 'GET'
param2 = 'CLOCK'
in actual version returns:
param1 = 'GET008(moregarbage)'
param2 = 'CLOCK0(moregarbage)'
I just come back to previous version (i love svn, do you?)
Just wanna tell you, im sure you will find where is the problem.
Best regards.
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
> It was valid code. Ugly, but valid.
>
Scot, i have bad news, the new version dont work as expected under
version 9.21 (i cannot test rigth now in version 10.xx, because i dont
will use RCM4XXX due to several reasons).
Example:
That line of code:
sscanf(datopc,"%s %s %s",param1,param2,param3);
with datopc = 'GET CLOCK'
in previous version returns:
param1 = 'GET'
param2 = 'CLOCK'
in actual version returns:
param1 = 'GET008(moregarbage)'
param2 = 'CLOCK0(moregarbage)'
I just come back to previous version (i love svn, do you?)
Just wanna tell you, im sure you will find where is the problem.
Best regards.
Donald.
------------------------------------
(You need to be a member of rabbit-semi -- send a blank email to rabbit-semi-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )