Mayank Kaushik wrote:
> 
> Ive downloaded the GNU toolchain from gnuarm.com. I had also gone
> to the codesourcery site mentioned above, but i didnt know what abi
> meant :-(, but a google define:abi took care of that.
> 
> Im trying to develop a stand alone device (for my senior undergrad
> project), much like a computer, around the at91rm9200. i have forsaken
> the ADS for now, since the trial licence is running out...moreover i
> think it will be more useful when i start hunting for a job :-|
> 
> I wil have to port the uC OS onto this board, and add a graphical
> interface, and also interfaces for a keyboard, usb etc.
> 
> But i have no idea how to go about "compiling a toolichain". im
> googling for info, but any link to a note etc would be nice..

It's nice that you send this three times, to ensure that we can't
miss it.  It is also pleasant that you quote nothing, so that the
message becomes a complete mystery to any reader.  I suspect you
also altered the subject, just to ensure the whole thing becomes an
incomprehensible orphan.

Look in my sig below for a means to avoid google foul-ups.  Then
quote, snip, and bottom-post.

-- 
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
 the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.  Click on 
 "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the 
 "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson

CBFalconer <c...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4...@yahoo.com:

> Mayank Kaushik wrote:
>> 
<snip entire post not relevant to discussion>
> 
> It's nice that you send this three times, to ensure that we can't
> miss it.  It is also pleasant that you quote nothing, so that the
> message becomes a complete mystery to any reader.  I suspect you
> also altered the subject, just to ensure the whole thing becomes an
> incomprehensible orphan.
> 
> Look in my sig below for a means to avoid google foul-ups.  Then
> quote, snip, and bottom-post.
> 

Well, he did not alter the subject anyway, and it threads fine in XNews.  
However as to the other complaints, agreed 100%, judicious quoting, and 
posting once are desirable.

-- 
Richard

> But i have no idea how to go about "compiling a toolchain". im googling
> for info, but any link to a note etc would be nice..


Search www.kegel.com and you will eventually find crosstool,
which is what you need.


--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson.
Ulf at atmel dot com
These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they
may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Nordic AB.

> It's nice that you send this three times, to ensure that we can't
> miss it.  It is also pleasant that you quote nothing, so that the
> message becomes a complete mystery to any reader.  I suspect you
> also altered the subject, just to ensure the whole thing becomes an
> incomprehensible orphan.
>
er..heh heh...sorry about that, friends..my browser got stuck, i
pressed the "post message" button once too often. wil b more careful in
the future :-(

Mayank Kaushik wrote:
> 
>> It's nice that you send this three times, to ensure that we can't
>> miss it.  It is also pleasant that you quote nothing, so that the
>> message becomes a complete mystery to any reader.  I suspect you
>> also altered the subject, just to ensure the whole thing becomes an
>> incomprehensible orphan.
>>
> er..heh heh...sorry about that, friends..my browser got stuck, i
> pressed the "post message" button once too often. wil b more careful
> in the future :-(

Allright!  Finally, a google user who has learned to use the
system.  Now I don't know whether he or google is to blame for
losing the attributes!  I do know who to blame for that silly 'b'
though.

-- 
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
 the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.  Click on 
 "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the 
 "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson

CBFalconer wrote:

> system.  Now I don't know whether he or google is to blame for
> losing the attributes!  I do know who to blame for that silly 'b'
> though.
> 

Uh..that better? And the "b" is a hangover of too much SMSing..