There are 91 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 90 to 91.
In article <vhipb+E...@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>, Chris Hills <c...@phaedsys.org> writes >In article <4...@yahoo.com>, CBFalconer ><c...@yahoo.com> writes >>Chris Hills wrote: >>> >>... snip ... >>> >>> However you have not given any reason why MISRA-C should be free. >>> There were costs in producing it. >> >>There were costs in producing the specifications for Pascal and for >>Ada, not to mention the costs of implementing them. IMO both are >>superior to MISRA in catching errors, yet both are available free >>of charge. > >So? Who paid costs for Pascal and ADA. BTW I thought the US Gov. >bankrolled Ada > >Will you sump up the costs for doing MISRA-C so others can have it free? /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ c...@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/