Just wondering - has there been significant testing / comparison between 
Chipcon and Freescale 802.15 transceivers? Which has the better RF 
performance?
Any other features that stand out between the two?

They seem similar to the naked eye..

thanks
-Andrew M 

"Andrew M" <noone@home> wrote:

>Just wondering - has there been significant testing / comparison between 
>Chipcon and Freescale 802.15 transceivers? Which has the better RF 
>performance?

All I've found is
http://blogger.xs4all.nl/ivonoorh/articles/4269.aspx

The Chipcon & Ember 2420 parts should have the same data, as they are
actually the same silicon.

>Any other features that stand out between the two?

The Freescale 2.4 GHz transmit/receive circuitry is more complex, so
there is slightly greater scope for errors in the PCB design & product
manufacture.

Now that Chipcon has bought Figure8, will Freescale continue to
license the Zigbee software from their competitor?

Jeremy Bentham
Iosoft Ltd.

From a support point of view, I'd worry about Freescale.  We were
initially interested in their products and found that they would not
return our (several) queries and calls.   Small companies & start-ups need
not apply, I guess.

Ross.



In article <m...@4ax.com>, Jeremy Bentham
<j...@iosoft.nospam.uk> wrote:

> "Andrew M" <noone@home> wrote:
> 
> >Just wondering - has there been significant testing / comparison between 
> >Chipcon and Freescale 802.15 transceivers? Which has the better RF 
> >performance?
> 
> All I've found is
> http://blogger.xs4all.nl/ivonoorh/articles/4269.aspx
> 
> The Chipcon & Ember 2420 parts should have the same data, as they are
> actually the same silicon.
> 
> >Any other features that stand out between the two?
> 
> The Freescale 2.4 GHz transmit/receive circuitry is more complex, so
> there is slightly greater scope for errors in the PCB design & product
> manufacture.
> 
> Now that Chipcon has bought Figure8, will Freescale continue to
> license the Zigbee software from their competitor?
> 
> Jeremy Bentham
> Iosoft Ltd.