n...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Tim Wescott wrote:
>> Should you write your application in assembly language you will find
>> that you have to rewrite every line to port to another processor.
> 
>  I'm going to study assembler.
> I thought that's what " having same 8051 core" is all about. so, do
> they all have different assembler instructions? and even if I create
> small app which uses only 1 I/O port and timer - I'll not be able to
> move it to another mcu without a lot of changes?
> 

No they all have the same 'core' with variations in additional bits. The
other posters misunderstood, they did not realise the AT89S... is just
another 8051 MCU.

You keep going with assembler. It will give you an excellent grounding in
the nuts and bolts of embedded systems. IMHO it is essential to understand
this first before using any HLL.

Ian

n...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Tim Wescott wrote:
>> Should you write your application in assembly language you will find
>> that you have to rewrite every line to port to another processor.
> 
>  I'm going to study assembler.
> I thought that's what " having same 8051 core" is all about. so, do
> they all have different assembler instructions? and even if I create
> small app which uses only 1 I/O port and timer - I'll not be able to
> move it to another mcu without a lot of changes?
> 

Just another thought. Pop along to 8052.com and sign up for the message
board. There are a whole bunch of 8051 users on there happy to give you a
helping hand. Also lots of good tutorial material.

See you there.

Ian

n...@yahoo.com wrote:

> actually, I was thinking about at89s. the only reason I asked about
> silab is their development board with jtag for about 70$.
> but, how usefull jtag is? 

jtag is usefull, because you test using the real silicon, in the
real world. In any interaction with peripherals/pins, that can
be vitally important :)

Simulators are good with the opcodes/core, but struggle with
the peripherals.

> can I get the same result with software simulator?

You can certainly learn a lot with a simulator.

I'd suggest starting with the SiLabs ToolStick, ~$10, which has a small 
uC  inside, and a USB Debug/Pgm link.
Gives the best of both worlds : Cheap, but uses real silicon :)


If you move up in their families, the C8051F41x is the newest.
This has 12bit ADC/DAC, and an on chip from-5V regulator,
so can drive power mosfets directly.

Atmel's newest AT89LP series members, have on-chip-debug, and
Atmel's debug solution is comming.

-jg

> I'm a beginner and I'd like to start from 8051 . as I can see-the only
> cheap boards with jtag are from silabs, right? there are a few of them
> for about 70$ , which one should I buy?


If you want to start very cheap and have the possebility to make your own 
pcb, here is one:
http://fidolinux.dk/elek/rev1/rev1.php 

Jim Granville wrote:
> n...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > actually, I was thinking about at89s. the only reason I asked about
> > silab is their development board with jtag for about 70$.
> > but, how usefull jtag is?
>
> jtag is usefull, because you test using the real silicon, in the
> real world. In any interaction with peripherals/pins, that can
> be vitally important :)
>
> Simulators are good with the opcodes/core, but struggle with
> the peripherals.
>
> > can I get the same result with software simulator?
>
> You can certainly learn a lot with a simulator.
>
> I'd suggest starting with the SiLabs ToolStick, ~$10, which has a small
> uC  inside, and a USB Debug/Pgm link.
> Gives the best of both worlds : Cheap, but uses real silicon :)
>
>
> If you move up in their families, the C8051F41x is the newest.
> This has 12bit ADC/DAC, and an on chip from-5V regulator,
> so can drive power mosfets directly.

by the way , I still can't get it . will I be able to program mcu using
this Development Kits? or, they are for evaluation only?

is it difficult to use(solder) this 32-pin9x9 LQFP package for a
"hobbyist"?



> Atmel's newest AT89LP series members, have on-chip-debug, and
> Atmel's debug solution is comming.
> 
> -jg

n...@yahoo.com wrote:

> Tim Wescott wrote:
> 
>>Should you write your application in assembly language you will find
>>that you have to rewrite every line to port to another processor.
> 
> 
>  I'm going to study assembler.
> I thought that's what " having same 8051 core" is all about. so, do
> they all have different assembler instructions? and even if I create
> small app which uses only 1 I/O port and timer - I'll not be able to
> move it to another mcu without a lot of changes?
> 
> thanks.
> 
Whoops -- I saw the 'ats', thought "Atmel" and jumped straight to "AVR", 
forgetting their fine line of 8051 compatible systems.

Yes, if it's an 8051 core the assembly should port just fine, within the 
limitations of the peripherals.

-- 

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google?  See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

Chris Hills wrote:
> In article <A...@web-ster.com>, Tim Wescott
> <t...@seemywebsite.com> writes
> 
>>n...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>I'm a beginner and I'd like to start from 8051 . as I can see-the only
>>>cheap boards with jtag are from silabs, right? there are a few of them
>>>for about 70$ , which one should I buy?
>>>will I be able easily move my code to other 8051 mcu like ats89s?
>>>
>>>thanks.
>>>
>>
>>Should you write your application in assembly language you will find 
>>that you have to rewrite every line to port to another processor.
>>
>>Should you choose a higher level language like C 
> 
> yes.
> 
> 
>>and are careful to 
>>write portable code then 
> 
> 
> No. Portable code is rarely needed.
> 
> 
>>yes.  I highly recommend Harbison and Steel's 
>>"C: A Reference Manual" for pointers on portable code.
> 
> 
> Good book.
> 
> 
>> Unfortunately, 
>>well-structured portable C code is a terrible fit for the 8051 
>>instruction set. 
> 
> 
> Yes to the portable bit. You can write very structured C that is 8051
> specific.
> 
> 
>>Your code will be bigger and slower than it would be 
>>if you fit your C code to match the processor -- but if you fit your C 
>>code to the 8051 then it'll be nasty stuff, 
> 
> 
> It will be good 8051 C very fast and efficient. 
> 
> 
>>and not terribly portable.
> 
> 
> usually irrelevant.
> 
> 
>>If you can afford the extra memory and slow operation that comes with 
>>good C on an 8051 it's the way to go, however.
> 
> 
> It will increase the unit cost of your product for no appreciable gain.
> If I found someone writing portable code in that situation I would
> probably fire them.
> 
yea -- see the part about assuming AVR when I saw Atmel...

There is a gain to writing portable code -- if it's going to be ported, 
that is.  And if you're writing code for a low production rate the 
economies of engineering cost vs. per-piece cost will lean heavily in 
favor of bigger faster processors if it eases the software engineering time.

-- 

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google?  See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

n...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Jim Granville wrote:
> 
>>n...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>actually, I was thinking about at89s. the only reason I asked about
>>>silab is their development board with jtag for about 70$.
>>>but, how usefull jtag is?
>>
>>jtag is usefull, because you test using the real silicon, in the
>>real world. In any interaction with peripherals/pins, that can
>>be vitally important :)
>>
>>Simulators are good with the opcodes/core, but struggle with
>>the peripherals.
>>
>>
>>>can I get the same result with software simulator?
>>
>>You can certainly learn a lot with a simulator.
>>
>>I'd suggest starting with the SiLabs ToolStick, ~$10, which has a small
>>uC  inside, and a USB Debug/Pgm link.
>>Gives the best of both worlds : Cheap, but uses real silicon :)
>>
>>
>>If you move up in their families, the C8051F41x is the newest.
>>This has 12bit ADC/DAC, and an on chip from-5V regulator,
>>so can drive power mosfets directly.
> 
> 
> by the way , I still can't get it . will I be able to program mcu using
> this Development Kits? or, they are for evaluation only?

You can pgm the MCU in the stick, but they did not pin-out the ISP 
wires. A bit of an oversight...

You can, of course, identify them easily, and bring them out yourself :)

> is it difficult to use(solder) this 32-pin9x9 LQFP package for a
> "hobbyist"?

SiLabs have one part that is DIP20, so I'd target that to start with.
The TQFP are easy enough to solder, solder wick == safety net.

-jg

mmm wrote:
> n...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I'm a beginner and I'd like to start from 8051 . as I can see-the only
>> cheap boards with jtag are from silabs, right? there are a few of them
>> for about 70$ , which one should I buy?
>> will I be able easily move my code to other 8051 mcu like ats89s?
>>
>> thanks.
>>
> 
> an alternative is start with an at89s52 or similar atmel parts is 
> available a almost-0 component programmer ( trough the PC parallel port 
> ) so you can start with a home built proptotype board.
> 
> there are lot of hardware/software project on 8051 available on the net.
> 
> with an at98s5x an old static ram an a 74hc373 o 74hc573 a 74hc00 and a 
> max232 you can build a system that is able to receive code trough the 
> serial port write in the ram and execute from there.
> 
> BTW the controller must be preprogrammed with one of the monitor 
> available on the net

Pointless..

Atmel and Phillips have parts with a built in serial boot loader.
Connect them to +5 and a MAX232 chip and you are done.
The PC software is available from their web sites.

Neil wrote:
> mmm wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Pointless..
> 
> Atmel and Phillips have parts with a built in serial boot loader.
> Connect them to +5 and a MAX232 chip and you are done.
> The PC software is available from their web sites.

Yes I know about these parts but they aren't 'cheap' as basic parts, 
Maxim/Dallas make similar parts too