There are 23 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 10 to 20.
"dasdd" <d...@f.cc> wrote in message news:<cjlu4j$739$1...@news.yaako.com>... > which CPU are you using? AVR
"dasdd" <d...@f.cc> schreef in bericht news:cjlu4j$739$1...@news.yaako.com... > which CPU are you using? Seriously contemplating 68HC908GB60...
"dasdd" <d...@f.cc> wrote in message news:cjlu4j$739$1...@news.yaako.com... > which CPU are you using? > > Atmel AT89C2051 for the small stuff Toshiba TMP95C265 for the big stuff John
"John Dyer" <j...@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message news:<GEZ7d.9532$J...@news.xtra.co.nz>... > "dasdd" <d...@f.cc> wrote in message news:cjlu4j$739$1...@news.yaako.com... > > which CPU are you using? pic16 series and rabbit semiconductor marans
dasdd wrote: > which CPU are you using? > 89C51 variants from Atmel, Maxim, Philips, SiliconLabs, Winbond, et al. Looking at ARMs from Philips, Atmel, STm, Analog devices et al. -jg
Jim Granville schrieb: > 89C51 variants from Atmel, Maxim, Philips, SiliconLabs, Winbond, et al. > Looking at ARMs from Philips, Atmel, STm, Analog devices et al. ditto. -- Dipl.-Ing. Tilmann Reh Autometer GmbH Siegen - Elektronik nach Maß. http://www.autometer.de
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:58:26 +0800, in comp.arch.embedded you wrote:
>which CPU are you using?
>
nobody seems to be using TI's MSP430
Any reasons?
martin
Serious error.
All shortcuts have disappeared.
Screen. Mind. Both are blank.
>On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:58:26 +0800, in comp.arch.embedded you wrote: > >>which CPU are you using? >> >nobody seems to be using TI's MSP430 > >Any reasons? > > >martin I'm sure the MSP430 is widely used. It very well might be that not everyone cares to report the MCU's they use. Probably because the job defines which MCU fit's the bill best. Having experinence with a given MCU helps, but only to the extent of favouring a device among similar ones. So, if you have a good reason to use the MSP430 go for it. I often use the Renesas M16C familly, Motorla ColdFires, PICs. HTH Markus
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:06:27 +0200, Markus Zingg <m...@nct.ch> wrote: >I'm sure the MSP430 is widely used. It very well might be that not >everyone cares to report the MCU's they use. Probably because the job >defines which MCU fit's the bill best. Or because competition reads these groups and may like to have any insights they can get about next gen developments going on. >Having experinence with a given >MCU helps, but only to the extent of favouring a device among similar >ones. Yes, the choice turns readily on a variety of priorities, few of which are all that widely shared. Some folks may have 2nd sourcing as uppermost, pruning away many excellent alternatives. Some folks may have low cost as uppermost, again pruning away many other choices. Or power consumption, or size, or temperature range, etc. When a question is dropped that just asks 'what cpu?' how are you supposed to answer that without any idea what the point is? Tabulation in a newsgroup of those choosing to answer?? >So, if you have a good reason to use the MSP430 go for it. Yup. Jon