CBFalconer wrote:

> Please do not top-post.

Results 1 - 100 of 358  for please do not top post 
author:c...@yahoo.com   	

-- 
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au>;
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266

donald wrote:
  > Please leave your jahad at home.

Oh my gawd! He's invoked terrorism labeling!
I'VE BEEN LABELED! Considered a "fair and
balanced" role on Fox News ?

-- 
Michael N. Moran           (h) 770 516 7918
5009 Old Field Ct.         (c) 678 521 5460
Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144    http://mnmoran.org

"So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains
  and we never even know we have the key."
"Already Gone" by Jack Tempchin (recorded by The Eagles)

The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1

Michael N. Moran wrote:
> donald wrote:
>  > Please leave your jahad at home.
> 
> Oh my gawd! He's invoked terrorism labeling!
> I'VE BEEN LABELED! Considered a "fair and
> balanced" role on Fox News ?
> 
sorry, I ment mother falconer.

But you (he) knew that.

It has gone from "net nazi" to "net jahadist".

(sign of the times)

donald

Hello CBFalconer,

  I've just taken the time to follow all the links you've provided that
should support your bottom-posting stance.

Alas, the first one does not say, as far as I can see, anything about it,
and the fourth one just refers to other sites (you allready linked too ...).
You might allso want to update the last link.

As for the second link ?  Please notice that the person writing it confuses
"arguments" with "by definition" (1), having certain pieces of software
running (2), a bad comparision (3), hints to make your post even better (4),
nonsense (at least when comparedto the way *I* do it) (5),  irrelevant stuff
(6), ignoring a different formatting (like mine) that *should* make clear
that the trailing stuff is *not* part of the message (7), and a "because we
say so" (8).

The third link ?  The same "you allways read from top to bottom"
argumentation, mentioned twice (paragraph 2.3, "Usually, the reading-flow
..." and "And besides: doesn't it look stupid ..."), again ignoring the
possibility of another method than their described top and bottom posting.

The last post ?  It allso assumes the messages cannot be read other that
wholly from top to bottom (Q6 & Q7), which is quite different (I think) from
the way I formatted my post.

Having said that, how many times have you gotten a snail-mail letter that
had (all) the previous letter(s) attached *infront* of it (making the reply
the last page) ?    I can say I never have. :-)

In short : currently my feeling is that you 1) have seen me doing something
you condemned as being top-posting without even really looking 2) you have
done little in actually reading the links you provided as substanciation to
your own preference.

Regards,
  Rudy Wieser


CBFalconer <c...@yahoo.com> schreef in berichtnieuws
4...@yahoo.com...
> "R.Wieser" wrote:
> >
> >> When you use a slow clock edge it become sensitive to
> >> even a slight amount of ground bounce or other noise.
> >
> > You've described a problem that I can't see and can't check for.
> > What am I supposed to do with it ?   Give up ? :-\
>
> Please do not top-post.  Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
> with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
> irrelevant material.  See the following links:
>
>   <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>;
>   <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>;
>   <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>;
>   <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>;  (taming google)
>   <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/>;  (newusers)
>
> --
>  [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
>  [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>;
>             Try the download section.