"Captain Bly" <Bobcrap@aol.com> wrote in message news:<%ciHc.89564$kz.18233379@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> We currently are using the Phillips XA processors for our embedded projects.
> We looking to move in to something new (JTAG not ICE) and something we can
> 'next generation' What is the general view on ARM and NIOS softcores FPGA's,
> I've been told the Altera parts are a long ramp up time and maybe we should
> go to an ARM by my sales rep. We do floating point, use some memory and need
> some glue logic. 16 or 32 bits would be our first choice. Any suggestions?
> thanks all
If your system needs a CPU with 2 UARTs and you can find that
configuration in a traditional device then that traditional device
will probably be less expensive in design and production. If how ever
you need 3 UARTs and have to add parts to support the traditional
device then very rapidly the softcore approach will become less
expensive.
The other thing I see happening relates to life of your system. If
the manufacturer decides to stop making the mocro hten you're forced
to last time buys and redesigns. If you have a softcore approach then
it's more straight forward to move the design into a newer FPGA.
Don't know if either of these points apply.
Keep us posted on your descisions as I think th egroup would be
interested.
George
Reply by Jon Beniston●July 13, 20042004-07-13
"Captain Bly" <Bobcrap@aol.com> wrote in message news:<%ciHc.89564$kz.18233379@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> We currently are using the Phillips XA processors for our embedded projects.
> We looking to move in to something new (JTAG not ICE) and something we can
> 'next generation' What is the general view on ARM and NIOS softcores FPGA's,
> I've been told the Altera parts are a long ramp up time and maybe we should
> go to an ARM by my sales rep. We do floating point, use some memory and need
> some glue logic. 16 or 32 bits would be our first choice. Any suggestions?
> thanks all
NIOS doesnt have h/w floating point, so depending on what performance
you need, that might be a no starter.
Cheers,
JonB
Reply by Schwob●July 12, 20042004-07-12
"Captain Bly" <Bobcrap@aol.com> wrote in message news:<%ciHc.89564$kz.18233379@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
> We currently are using the Phillips XA processors for our embedded projects.
> We looking to move in to something new (JTAG not ICE) and something we can
> 'next generation' What is the general view on ARM and NIOS softcores FPGA's,
> I've been told the Altera parts are a long ramp up time and maybe we should
> go to an ARM by my sales rep. We do floating point, use some memory and need
> some glue logic. 16 or 32 bits would be our first choice. Any suggestions?
> thanks all
Hi,
did you have a look at existing microcontrollers instead of softcores.
If you want to spend more development time, more many on the device,
more power in your application but get a very specific implementation,
go for a softcore. If you are OK with a standard micro, lots of
available tools but not sp specific for your application, you might
want to try the LPC2000 micros from Philips (ARM7 based) or if you
have another half year time to wait for devices from ST
Microclectronis and / or Atmel, they will have similar devices to the
Philips offering.
Lots of information here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/
Cheers, Schwob
Reply by Captain Bly●July 8, 20042004-07-08
We currently are using the Phillips XA processors for our embedded projects.
We looking to move in to something new (JTAG not ICE) and something we can
'next generation' What is the general view on ARM and NIOS softcores FPGA's,
I've been told the Altera parts are a long ramp up time and maybe we should
go to an ARM by my sales rep. We do floating point, use some memory and need
some glue logic. 16 or 32 bits would be our first choice. Any suggestions?
thanks all