> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:34:35 +0100, David Brown
> <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote:
>
>> 42Bastian Schick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:42:02 -0800 (PST), Marco
>>> <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Open source BSD licensed RTOS
>>> Finally a new RTOS. Great, we all have been waiting for a free RTOS
>>> for soooooo long.
>>>
>> Did you bother to look at the site, or is this just a
>
> I even did download it :-)
>
You've got further than me - I only got as far as reading some of the
website. But I have made a note of it for the future - maybe it will be
useful to me.
>> knee-jerk reaction?
>
> In a way, yes :-)
>
>> Yes, Nutxx is another free RTOS - but there is space for a
>
> I've seen, it is actually quiet "old" (already version 5).
>
>> selection of RTOS's in this world, both free and non-free. There are a
>> great many people using free OS's of various sorts and various sizes.
>
> Sure. But I just wonder why again and again new RTOS's appear, and all
> repeat the same philosophy (shared memory, semaphores).
>
Most RTOS's (free or otherwise) have reasonably similar designs, as far
as I have seen. However, I could well imagine applications where some
of the features of Nutxx, such as its shell and its file system support,
would make it a very strong contender. To my mind, that makes it
another /interesting/ free RTOS.
>> This one seems to be "bigger" than FreeRTOS, but "smaller" than ecos -
>> I'm sure there are people here who will look at it with interest.
>
> Despite many others that now and then appear NuttX seems pretty
> complete in what it offers.
Reply by 42Bastian Schick●January 19, 20102010-01-19
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:34:35 +0100, David Brown
<david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote:
>42Bastian Schick wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:42:02 -0800 (PST), Marco
>> <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Open source BSD licensed RTOS
>>
>> Finally a new RTOS. Great, we all have been waiting for a free RTOS
>> for soooooo long.
>>
>
>Did you bother to look at the site, or is this just a
I even did download it :-)
>knee-jerk reaction?
In a way, yes :-)
> Yes, Nutxx is another free RTOS - but there is space for a
I've seen, it is actually quiet "old" (already version 5).
>selection of RTOS's in this world, both free and non-free. There are a
>great many people using free OS's of various sorts and various sizes.
Sure. But I just wonder why again and again new RTOS's appear, and all
repeat the same philosophy (shared memory, semaphores).
>This one seems to be "bigger" than FreeRTOS, but "smaller" than ecos -
>I'm sure there are people here who will look at it with interest.
Despite many others that now and then appear NuttX seems pretty
complete in what it offers.
--
42Bastian
Do not email to bastian42@yahoo.com, it's a spam-only account :-)
Use <same-name>@monlynx.de instead !
Reply by David Brown●January 18, 20102010-01-18
42Bastian Schick wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:42:02 -0800 (PST), Marco
> <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Open source BSD licensed RTOS
>
> Finally a new RTOS. Great, we all have been waiting for a free RTOS
> for soooooo long.
>
Did you bother to look at the site, or is this just a knee-jerk
reaction? Yes, Nutxx is another free RTOS - but there is space for a
selection of RTOS's in this world, both free and non-free. There are a
great many people using free OS's of various sorts and various sizes.
This one seems to be "bigger" than FreeRTOS, but "smaller" than ecos -
I'm sure there are people here who will look at it with interest.
Reply by 42Bastian Schick●January 16, 20102010-01-16
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:42:02 -0800 (PST), Marco
<prenom_nomus@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Open source BSD licensed RTOS
Finally a new RTOS. Great, we all have been waiting for a free RTOS
for soooooo long.
--
42Bastian
Do not email to bastian42@yahoo.com, it's a spam-only account :-)
Use <same-name>@monlynx.de instead !