Reply by chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn●January 15, 20052005-01-15
<larwe@larwe.com> wrote:
> >I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed
> >transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice
> >mails.
>
> There used to be services that would read your email over the phone
> (synthesized). Hmm.
They still exist.
--
David Horne- www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
Reply by ●January 15, 20052005-01-15
>I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed
>transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice
>mails.
There used to be services that would read your email over the phone
(synthesized). Hmm.
Reply by ●January 15, 20052005-01-15
> > whenever there was a hacking run in the script - on GSM voice,
> > Morse might be be the best!
>
Lewin A.R.W. Edwards wrote:
> Actually, maybe speech synthesis and recognition would be the best!
>
I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed
transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice
mails.
Do you know of any published studies ?
Perhaps I should google: "speech synthesis"+ "bandwidth" ?
== Chris Glur.