Reply by chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn January 15, 20052005-01-15
<larwe@larwe.com> wrote:

> >I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed > >transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice > >mails. > > There used to be services that would read your email over the phone > (synthesized). Hmm.
They still exist. -- David Horne- www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
Reply by January 15, 20052005-01-15
>I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed >transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice >mails.
There used to be services that would read your email over the phone (synthesized). Hmm.
Reply by January 15, 20052005-01-15
> > whenever there was a hacking run in the script - on GSM voice, > > Morse might be be the best! >
Lewin A.R.W. Edwards wrote:
> Actually, maybe speech synthesis and recognition would be the best! >
I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice mails. Do you know of any published studies ? Perhaps I should google: "speech synthesis"+ "bandwidth" ? == Chris Glur.