"Meindert Sprang" <ms@NOJUNKcustomORSPAMware.nl> wrote in message
news:4c876d72$0$22916$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> "Noodnik" <Noodnik@NotHere.com> wrote in message
> news:-pydnfNde5cooRrRnZ2dnUVZ7o6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>> Hi, I'm running an approval (unregistered) copy of the ImageCraft ICC12
> IDE,
>> and finding that I can't download the S19 files that it generates. The
> HCS12
>> target rejects everything from the second line of the file onwards. S19
>> files from another IDE load without problems, and I can't see anything
>> superficially wrong with the files, the record structure looks fine and
>> essentially the same as the files that work.
>>
>> Does anyone know whether there's a block on downloads for the approval
>> version, eg. by posting an incorrect checksum?
>
> Have you asked Imagecraft themselves? Their support and responsiveness is
> excellent!
>
> Meindert
>
You're right. It's spectacularly good.
Reply by Meindert Sprang●September 8, 20102010-09-08
"Noodnik" <Noodnik@NotHere.com> wrote in message
news:-pydnfNde5cooRrRnZ2dnUVZ7o6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
> Hi, I'm running an approval (unregistered) copy of the ImageCraft ICC12
IDE,
> and finding that I can't download the S19 files that it generates. The
HCS12
> target rejects everything from the second line of the file onwards. S19
> files from another IDE load without problems, and I can't see anything
> superficially wrong with the files, the record structure looks fine and
> essentially the same as the files that work.
>
> Does anyone know whether there's a block on downloads for the approval
> version, eg. by posting an incorrect checksum?
Have you asked Imagecraft themselves? Their support and responsiveness is
excellent!
Meindert
Reply by Noodnik●September 8, 20102010-09-08
Hi, I'm running an approval (unregistered) copy of the ImageCraft ICC12 IDE,
and finding that I can't download the S19 files that it generates. The HCS12
target rejects everything from the second line of the file onwards. S19
files from another IDE load without problems, and I can't see anything
superficially wrong with the files, the record structure looks fine and
essentially the same as the files that work.
Does anyone know whether there's a block on downloads for the approval
version, eg. by posting an incorrect checksum?
BTW, I considered posting the S19 file, not sure whether it's considered
good practice in this NG. TIA