Reply by October 11, 20102010-10-11
Sink0 <sink00@gmail.com> writes:

> I just found another good option at Freescale forums. A guy recomended > me FNET. Any one got any experience with that stack? What would be the > main difference comapared to LiteNiche?
The FNET code looks pretty clean and well organized, but it requires the MetroWerks compiler and does not compile using CodeSourcery gcc under Linux. Petter -- .sig removed by request.
Reply by Sink0 October 11, 20102010-10-11
I just found another good option at Freescale forums. A guy recomended
me FNET. Any one got any experience with that stack? What would be the
main difference comapared to LiteNiche?

For now i am probably focusing on lwIP but if for some reason i find
out that FNET is a much better option, changing for it would not be a
big problem at all.

Thank you!
Reply by Glyn Davies October 6, 20102010-10-06
"Sink0" <sink00@n_o_s_p_a_m.gmail.com> wrote:
> > The product is just aimed to be used on a local network so protection > is > not a problem so far..
Tell that to siemens who's embedded industrial control platform has been hit by that industrial worm recently!
Reply by Sink0 October 6, 20102010-10-06
On Oct 6, 3:20=A0pm, FreeRTOS info <noem...@given.com> wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 13:01, Sink0 wrote: > > > > > On Oct 5, 5:33 pm, Mel <mwil...@the-wire.com> wrote: > >> Sink0 wrote: > > >> ally off-topic, Richard wrote that he would like to know which > > >>> board have a ARM 7 and a BIOS. Just to make things clear for me. What=
s
> >>> exactly does run a uCU from the BIOS means. Until today that would > >>> mean that it is running with no OS (as it would happen on a DSP or a > >>> low-end uCU). Isnt that the real meaning? If not, how would you call > >>> that and whats the real meaning of running from BIOS? > > >> Fair enough. =A0If you're defining terms, that's not an unreasonable > >> definition. =A0My preferred term would be some variation on "running o=
n bare
> >> silicon." > > >> For me, BIOS is a firmware subroutine library that overlying software > >> invokes to access hardware. =A0A bare-silicon program will have these > >> functions, of course, but it won't have to organize them to be accessi=
ble
> >> from outside. > > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Mel. > > > Any one knows if lwIP need an OS? Or can i run it "on bare silicon"? > > How aboute NicheLite? > > > Thank you! > > lwIP can be used with no OS. =A0I know NicheLite can be used with simple > co-operative schedulers, but I'm not sure about with no OS at all - > although I would be very surprised if it couldn't. > > Regards, > Richard. > > +http://www.FreeRTOS.org > Designed for Microcontrollers. =A0More than 7000 downloads per month. > > +http://www.SafeRTOS.com > Certified by T=DCV as meeting the requirements for safety related systems=
. Any other comment about a comparison between both (lwIP and LiteNiche)? The license of LiteNiche would probably be a problem, but to start we could use a ColdFire with Freescale stack (with LiteNiche) and for latter development get the full license. But about performance and restrictions, any coment about both? Another question is, how portable are the webservers usually? I mean can i use the coldfire webserver (implemented using LiteNiche) with the lwIP, or use the uIP webserver with lwIP? Any suggestion of free webserver that can be used with lwIP (if possible with some sort of authentication as a password) Thank you very much for all the responses!!
Reply by FreeRTOS info October 6, 20102010-10-06
On 06/10/2010 13:01, Sink0 wrote:
> On Oct 5, 5:33 pm, Mel <mwil...@the-wire.com> wrote: >> Sink0 wrote: >> >> ally off-topic, Richard wrote that he would like to know which >> >>> board have a ARM 7 and a BIOS. Just to make things clear for me. What=
s
>>> exactly does run a uCU from the BIOS means. Until today that would >>> mean that it is running with no OS (as it would happen on a DSP or a >>> low-end uCU). Isnt that the real meaning? If not, how would you call >>> that and whats the real meaning of running from BIOS? >> >> Fair enough. If you're defining terms, that's not an unreasonable >> definition. My preferred term would be some variation on "running on =
bare
>> silicon." >> >> For me, BIOS is a firmware subroutine library that overlying software >> invokes to access hardware. A bare-silicon program will have these >> functions, of course, but it won't have to organize them to be accessi=
ble
>> from outside. >> >> Mel. >=20 > Any one knows if lwIP need an OS? Or can i run it "on bare silicon"? > How aboute NicheLite? >=20 > Thank you!
lwIP can be used with no OS. I know NicheLite can be used with simple co-operative schedulers, but I'm not sure about with no OS at all - although I would be very surprised if it couldn't. Regards, Richard. + http://www.FreeRTOS.org Designed for Microcontrollers. More than 7000 downloads per month. + http://www.SafeRTOS.com Certified by T=DCV as meeting the requirements for safety related systems= =2E
Reply by Sink0 October 6, 20102010-10-06
On Oct 5, 5:33=A0pm, Mel <mwil...@the-wire.com> wrote:
> Sink0 wrote: > > ally off-topic, Richard wrote that he would like to know which > > > board have a ARM 7 and a BIOS. Just to make things clear for me. Whats > > exactly does run a uCU from the BIOS means. Until today that would > > mean that it is running with no OS (as it would happen on a DSP or a > > low-end uCU). Isnt that the real meaning? If not, how would you call > > that and whats the real meaning of running from BIOS? > > Fair enough. =A0If you're defining terms, that's not an unreasonable > definition. =A0My preferred term would be some variation on "running on b=
are
> silicon." > > For me, BIOS is a firmware subroutine library that overlying software > invokes to access hardware. =A0A bare-silicon program will have these > functions, of course, but it won't have to organize them to be accessible > from outside. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Mel.
Any one knows if lwIP need an OS? Or can i run it "on bare silicon"? How aboute NicheLite? Thank you!
Reply by Mel October 5, 20102010-10-05
Sink0 wrote:
ally off-topic, Richard wrote that he would like to know which
> board have a ARM 7 and a BIOS. Just to make things clear for me. Whats > exactly does run a uCU from the BIOS means. Until today that would > mean that it is running with no OS (as it would happen on a DSP or a > low-end uCU). Isnt that the real meaning? If not, how would you call > that and whats the real meaning of running from BIOS?
Fair enough. If you're defining terms, that's not an unreasonable definition. My preferred term would be some variation on "running on bare silicon." For me, BIOS is a firmware subroutine library that overlying software invokes to access hardware. A bare-silicon program will have these functions, of course, but it won't have to organize them to be accessible from outside. Mel.
Reply by Sink0 October 5, 20102010-10-05
> I replied to your original post regarding that, although I am curious as > to which board you are planning on using that has an ARM7 and a BIOS.
Thank you for all the information!! Very useful!! Any other ingestion will be appreciated hehe. Now totally off-topic, Richard wrote that he would like to know which board have a ARM 7 and a BIOS. Just to make things clear for me. Whats exactly does run a uCU from the BIOS means. Until today that would mean that it is running with no OS (as it would happen on a DSP or a low-end uCU). Isnt that the real meaning? If not, how would you call that and whats the real meaning of running from BIOS? Thank you very much!!
Reply by Ignacio G. T. October 5, 20102010-10-05
El 04/10/2010 16:24, Sink0 escribi&#4294967295;:
> Hi i need to implement an embedded webserver and i was wondering, what is > the most common practice on this field. To develop your own TCP/IP stack or > use a generic and open one as uIP? Any one knows if uIP is reliable? We > don't have a defined hardware, so i need to create it as portable as > possible but probably will be a 32 bits uCU as ARM. Just to explain the > application, is to create a basic interface to our product for initial > configuration purposes. >
I have successfully used GoAhead ( http://www.goahead.com/products/webserver/default.aspx ) with a product running VxWorks, which provides its own TCP/IP stack (based on BSD.) It's free and small, and has been ported to several OSs, both commercial and open source. I would never write my own TCP/IP stack or web server these days.
Reply by FreeRTOS info October 5, 20102010-10-05
On 05/10/2010 10:49, Sink0 wrote:
>> I replied to your original post regarding that, although I am curious =
as
>> to which board you are planning on using that has an ARM7 and a BIOS. >=20 >=20 > Well i used the unappropriated word. I am just running the uCU with no =
OS.
> Any way, that was a piece of good information about uIP. About the > processor, probably a 32 bits uCU with 256KB of flash and 32KB of RAM > minimum. For sure not less than that. But maybe and most probably more.=
> Actually to use a low end 32 bit uCU is not fixed. We may use a high en=
d
> ARM as a TI OMAP too. I am not defining the processor and requirements > because i am creating a standard solution for all our products. I cant =
even
> say that is a product because is not intended for commercial purposes f=
or
> now but that kind of information is irrelevant. Do you have any experie=
nce
> with lwIP. According to the author, it got a bigger throughput. For sur=
e
> the fact that the stack would be that slow is for sure not good as the > system would be controlled using the Ethernet connection. Any suggestio=
n
> about non-expensive commercial stack or free reliable stack better than=
uIP
> (or lwIP)?
I think lwIP is a good stack for its intended purpose and the FreeRTOS code does include some lwIP examples too - although they are rather old now. Positives are the way it minimises its memory usage by chaining memory buffers together, and its free liberal licensing. Negatives are the way it minimises its memory usage by chaining memory buffers together - because of the extra processing time required. Like all engineering - the design decisions involve trade offs. It is also quite complex to use and configure the first time you approach it - there are three API's for a start so the first decision is which to use. Once you have invested the time it works well, but you do need to invest the time to become a competent users. lwIP is a bit of a moving target because it is constantly being developed and updated (which is not necessarily a negative thing). Also, I'm not sure if there are any complete web servers available for free that will just slot into with it. The web server that comes with lwIP is not much more than what some professional TCP/IP stack vendors call an "HTTP listener". Some microcontroller vendors have free versions of NicheLite you could utilise, and then, given enough RAM, you could obtain a free or low cost web server from several different companies or open source projects. Regards, Richard. + http://www.FreeRTOS.org Designed for Microcontrollers. More than 7000 downloads per month. + http://www.SafeRTOS.com Certified by T=DCV as meeting the requirements for safety related systems= =2E