Reply by Tauno Voipio May 2, 20042004-05-02
Everett M. Greene wrote:
> "Neil Bradley" <nb_no_spam@synthcom.com> writes: > >>I'm currently designing a replacement main board for my Heathkit ID-5001 >>weather station. I already have replacement relative humidity, >>windspeed/direction, and temperature sensors, but I'm looking for a >>barometric pressure and and rain gauge sensor solution. By any chance is >>anyone aware of an I2C or SPI based device that can provide this >>functionality? Or better yet, is there anyone that can point me to how some >>of the electronic rain gauges work? > > > What's rain? 8-) > > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > method for measuring wind speed?
I'll refer to my earlier response: For a professional solution, go to <http://www.vaisala.com/>, pick wind sensing and look for WS425. Tauno Voipio tauno voipio @ iki fi
Reply by Everett M. Greene April 30, 20042004-04-30
CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> writes:
> "Everett M. Greene" wrote: > > > .... snip ... > > > > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > > method for measuring wind speed? > > Stick finger in mouth, extract, and hold up. Wind is coming from > cool side, and coolness is a relative measure of wind speed. > Calibration to local conditions is needed :-)
You forgot to mention the Wyoming wind gauge -- a log chain hanging from a tree limb. You count the number of links standing straight out. NCAR may want to consider the chain method. They once lost their anemometer after seeing the velocity go off scale at 125 MPH in one of Boulder's "breezes". [Hurricanes?!? Hurricanes are for wimps!]
Reply by Tauno Voipio April 30, 20042004-04-30
"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4090B779.CD0BE318@yahoo.com...
> "Everett M. Greene" wrote: > > > ... snip ... > > > > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > > method for measuring wind speed? >
For a professional solution, go to <http://www.vaisala.com/>, pick wind sensing and look for WS425. Tauno Voipio tauno voipio @ iki fi
Reply by CBFalconer April 29, 20042004-04-29
"Everett M. Greene" wrote:
>
... snip ...
> > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > method for measuring wind speed?
Stick finger in mouth, extract, and hold up. Wind is coming from cool side, and coolness is a relative measure of wind speed. Calibration to local conditions is needed :-) -- Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@worldnet.att.net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
Reply by Bill Ricker N1VUX April 25, 20042004-04-25
> > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > > method for measuring wind speed?
> Look up "Hot wire anemometer" I have implemented several of these > for both high and low flows.. they can be very accurate. > You will need the temperature, humidity and pressure of the gas ( air ) > for the most accurate results..
IIRC, calibration at high humidity and/or very high speed can be a problem -- don't you you actually need the both the gas mixing ratio and the liquid water content as well? A Pacific Cyclone on Guam almost took Mt.Washington's wind record, but it was determined that the excessive horizontal liquid content kept the hot wire colder than the "mere" hurricane-strength wind accounted for. See also: http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/world-record.html WIND SENSOR IS AN AN/FPQ13 DIGITAL WIND SENSOR (HOT WIRE ANEMOMETER). (WINDS ARE GENERALLY ACCURATE AT WIND GUSTS LESS THAN 100 KT OUTSIDE HEAVY RAIN.) http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/ac/acpq70.pgum.psh.pq.txt
Reply by Bill Ricker N1VUX April 25, 20042004-04-25
> > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > > method for measuring wind speed?
> Look up "Hot wire anemometer" I have implemented several of these > for both high and low flows.. they can be very accurate. > You will need the temperature, humidity and pressure of the gas ( air ) > for the most accurate results..
IIRC, calibration at high humidity and/or very high speed can be a problem -- don't you you actually need the both the gas mixing ratio and the liquid water content as well? A Pacific Cyclone on Guam almost took Mt.Washington's wind record, but it was determined that the excessive horizontal liquid content kept the hot wire colder than the "mere" hurricane-strength wind accounted for. See also: http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/world-record.html WIND SENSOR IS AN AN/FPQ13 DIGITAL WIND SENSOR (HOT WIRE ANEMOMETER). (WINDS ARE GENERALLY ACCURATE AT WIND GUSTS LESS THAN 100 KT OUTSIDE HEAVY RAIN.) http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/ac/acpq70.pgum.psh.pq.txt
Reply by R. Martin April 24, 20042004-04-24
Robert Scott wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:07:30 GMT, "R. Martin" <russell.martin@wdn.com> > wrote: > > >...a laser anemometer. It > >used the correlation between the turbulence induced fluctuations in > >laser light arriving at the two eyepieces of binoculars to calculate > >the component of windspeed perpendicular to the light beam,.. > > The sonic ones have the advantage that they will work even in very > foggy weather which will render the laser type useless. >
True, but that's a bigger problem some places than others. I like the sonic ones, too, but we never encountered heavy enough fog to prevent the laser system's use. Of course, we were using it to measure convergence under sunny conditions. ;-) Cheers, Russell
Reply by Robert Scott April 24, 20042004-04-24
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:07:30 GMT, "R. Martin" <russell.martin@wdn.com>
wrote:

>...a laser anemometer. It >used the correlation between the turbulence induced fluctuations in >laser light arriving at the two eyepieces of binoculars to calculate >the component of windspeed perpendicular to the light beam,..
The sonic ones have the advantage that they will work even in very foggy weather which will render the laser type useless. -Robert Scott Ypsilanti, Michigan (Reply through this forum, not by direct e-mail to me, as automatic reply address is fake.)
Reply by R. Martin April 24, 20042004-04-24
Everett M. Greene wrote:
> > "Neil Bradley" <nb_no_spam@synthcom.com> writes: > > I'm currently designing a replacement main board for my Heathkit ID-5001 > > weather station. I already have replacement relative humidity, > > windspeed/direction, and temperature sensors, but I'm looking for a > > barometric pressure and and rain gauge sensor solution. By any chance is > > anyone aware of an I2C or SPI based device that can provide this > > functionality? Or better yet, is there anyone that can point me to how some > > of the electronic rain gauges work? > > What's rain? 8-) > > While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical > method for measuring wind speed?
Grant mentioned sonic anemometers, but I've seen designs for building your own that are not as expensive as the examples he mentioned. In college my advanced physics lab class built a laser anemometer. It used the correlation between the turbulence induced fluctuations in laser light arriving at the two eyepieces of binoculars to calculate the component of windspeed perpendicular to the light beam, so you need two of them to get the total horizontal wind speed (like with sonic anemometers. With today's cheap solid state lasers and large- scale digital ICs, it should be much easier and cheaper to build one of these than it was 30 years ago. Cheers, Russell
Reply by Clint Sharp April 24, 20042004-04-24
In message <408a9d89$0$17263$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com>, Grant 
Edwards <grante@visi.com> writes
>In article <20040424.7A2A690.8736@mojaveg.iwvisp.com>, Everett M. Greene wrote: > >> While we're on the subject, is there a good non-mechanical >> method for measuring wind speed? > >A project I worked on once used a two-axis ultrasonic wind >speed sensor. It cost thousands of dollars, though... >
Everyday and Practical Electronics in the UK published a weather station design using an ultrasonic anenometer, check out their web site http://www.epemag.wimborne.co.uk for the August and September 2003 back issues. -- Clint Sharp