"Rick" <temp1@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:8986633b.0403090920.13bde3ad@posting.google.com...
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
We provide a nice IDE and debugger, and super CrossConnect for MSP430 which
can load the MSP430 at 28K/second. Try www.rowley.co.uk and follow your
nose.
-- Paul Curtis.
Reply by Ulf Samuelsson●March 11, 20042004-03-11
Rick wrote:
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
How about the IAR Embedded Workbench for AVR
Limited edition is Free but limited to 4kB C-code
Sorry, could not resist :-)
--
Best Regards
Ulf at atmel dot com
These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they
may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Sweden.
Reply by Hershel Roberson●March 10, 20042004-03-10
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
I've got the Quadrovox (http://www.quadravox.com/AQ430.htm), and it works
well for me. It's only $395, and they have a 30 day free trial.
I've also got the IAR Baseline package, which has been a complete waste of
money.
-Hershel
Reply by Ian Okey●March 10, 20042004-03-10
temp1@cfl.rr.com (Rick) wrote in message news:<8986633b.0403090920.13bde3ad@posting.google.com>...
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
I started developing using the IAR tools (the only ones available at
the time) and found them to compile well but the IDE was very poor.
When sother toolsets came available I looked at all of them and
migrated my code over to each in turn. They are all good, with better
support than IAR, which can be very slow.
I still use the IAR toolset because of inertia and the prohibitive
cost of retesting the code if I change to another toolset but, if I
was sarting out again then I would not be using IAR. I would probably
be using the Rowley tools but could equally well be using Quadravox or
Imagecraft all of which are highly regarded and have loyal followers.
For home/hobby use then go for the GNU tools but be prepared to do a
bit of work to get everything up and running.
Ian
Reply by Rich Webb●March 9, 20042004-03-09
On 9 Mar 2004 09:20:45 -0800, temp1@cfl.rr.com (Rick) wrote:
>We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
>Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
I've used the Imagecraft MSP430 compiler a little (but their AVR
compiler quite a lot). Happy with both. Would buy either again.
There's a free download of an evaluation/demo version at
www.imagecraft.com/software.
There's also a mailing list, and archives of the list, at
www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
Reply by Guido Muesch●March 9, 20042004-03-09
Rick writes:
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
>
> TIA
I am using the IAR Workbench currently, but we also experimented with
the MSP-GCC. Source code changes were minor, because it seems that both
compiler derive their include files from TI. Only interrupt definitions
are different between compilers (but nothing which couldn't be solved
with some #ifdefs if you want to support both compilers). So, "porting"
to MSP-GCC was fairly painless.
Our local TI contact also recommends a different compiler coming from
http://www.rowley.co.uk/, but I have not checked that one. Anybody
having experiences with it?
Guido
Reply by Mark A. Odell●March 9, 20042004-03-09
temp1@cfl.rr.com (Rick) wrote in
news:8986633b.0403090920.13bde3ad@posting.google.com:
> We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
> Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
On 9 Mar 2004 09:20:45 -0800, temp1@cfl.rr.com (Rick) wrote:
>We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
>Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
>
Imagecraft has a reputation for good compilers, and they're
significantly cheaper than IAR. I believe they make one for the
MSP430.
There's also a GCC for the 430. I haven't tried it, but the GCC for
the Atmel AVR is very good, and the price is right.
Regards,
-=Dave
--
Change is inevitable, progress is not.
Reply by Rick●March 9, 20042004-03-09
We are looking for a cheaper (but good) alternative to the IAR
Embedded Workbench for the MSP430. Any suggestions?
TIA