Reply by David Brown March 3, 20042004-03-03
"Jason Moore" <jason_ceng@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:335ca3c9.0403021522.4b78cffd@posting.google.com...
> Well if the original question is how do I get a good cheap C > environment for Mega128 development?.... > > I think the best thing to do is to call your local IAR office with > your educational use proof to hand -80% or more discount to > educational users you see. > > Also -remeber the Mega128 has a nifty JTAG debug port -IAR's tools for > example can set brakpoints from the editor window that follow through > right into the target Mega128 >
That's very misleading - the jtag port on the Megas has nothing whatsoever to do with IAR. Every debugger software for the AVR which can use the jtag ice (such as IAR's debugger, or the free standard AVR Studio, or the free gdb/insight debugger, and most other AVR debuggers) will be able to use the jtag debugging features such as breakpoints. If you want to argue that IAR's debugger software is more powerful, or more user-friendly, or whatever, then go ahead - I haven't used it on the AVR, so I can't comment. But don't claim credit for features of the chip itself !
> Jason Moore CEng
You forgot to mention here that you work for IAR, although to your great credit you did so on other posts (which is how I know).
Reply by Jason Moore March 2, 20042004-03-02
Well if the original question is how do I get a good cheap C
environment for Mega128 development?....

I think the best thing to do is to call your local IAR office with
your educational use proof to hand -80% or more discount to
educational users you see.

Also -remeber the Mega128 has a nifty JTAG debug port -IAR's tools for
example can set brakpoints from the editor window that follow through
right into the target Mega128

Jason Moore CEng
Reply by February 2, 20042004-02-02
yes the gcc port for avr is available . called avr-gcc.
its said to be good. and support is available for the large development
community
"Sebastian Schildt" <sebastian@frozenlight.de> wrote in message
news:bvdg01$pmolr$1@ID-162011.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Hi! > > Richard F. Man wrote: > > > >> versions prior to 4.08 can not do this (They will only show you the > >> assembler code your compiler generated). > >> > > > > "your" compiler here must refer only to GCCAVR as AVR Studio can debug
at
> > C source level, at least with ICCAVR and IAR generated code at C source > > level since "forever." > > > > Sorry, I didn't know that. > > -- > If you see light at the end of the wormhole it is most likely a photon > torpedo.
Reply by Sebastian Schildt January 30, 20042004-01-30
Hi!

Richard F. Man wrote:


>> versions prior to 4.08 can not do this (They will only show you the >> assembler code your compiler generated). >> > > "your" compiler here must refer only to GCCAVR as AVR Studio can debug at > C source level, at least with ICCAVR and IAR generated code at C source > level since "forever." >
Sorry, I didn't know that. -- If you see light at the end of the wormhole it is most likely a photon torpedo.
Reply by William Meyer January 30, 20042004-01-30
oN 29-Jan-04, Dan said:

> I've been using gcc for an Hitachi processor. It works very well and > is well supported by the community. Is the AVR port good and is it > well supported?
Suggest you check with people on www.avrfreaks.net Their forums are pretty active, and one of them is devoted to the AVR port = of gcc. -- Bill Posted with XanaNews Version 1.16.1.4
Reply by Dan January 29, 20042004-01-29
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:35:56 -0700, hamilton
<hamilton@deminsional.com> wrote:

>Just download from: ><http://www.avrfreaks.com/AVRGCC/index.php?PHPSESSID=27312dd38455a46995b43be7521c26c2> > >Install and just use it.
I've been using gcc for an Hitachi processor. It works very well and is well supported by the community. Is the AVR port good and is it well supported? Dan
Reply by Richard F. Man January 27, 20042004-01-27

Sebastian Schildt wrote:

> AVR Studio has only the assembler integrated. With AVRStudio 4.08 it is > possible to debug C Code. You have to program in another environment, but > the resulting object File can be download into AVR Studios Simulator. When > using GCCs "extcoff" Format AVRStudio 4.08 is able to debug on the C-Leve, > e.g. you step through C Functions not assembly. Beware: AVRStudio versions > prior to 4.08 can not do this (They will only show you the assembler code > your compiler generated). >
"your" compiler here must refer only to GCCAVR as AVR Studio can debug at C source level, at least with ICCAVR and IAR generated code at C source level since "forever." -- // richard http://www.imagecraft.com
Reply by hamilton January 27, 20042004-01-27

Medene&#4294967295; wrote:

> Good idea is build cross-compiler for AVR from gcc source, but on Cygwin
This is a lousy idea. ( must be a *nix guy that said that ) Just download from: <http://www.avrfreaks.com/AVRGCC/index.php?PHPSESSID=27312dd38455a46995b43be7521c26c2> Install and just use it.
Reply by =?iso-8859-2?Q?Medene=B6_ January 27, 20042004-01-27
Hi harshit!

> Is the AVR Studio for the ATMEL Mega 128 Microcontroller a free tool > Set. I am asking for the C development studio? Are they any > retrictions? >
Good idea is build cross-compiler for AVR from gcc source, but on Cygwin enviroment (if You working on Windows) and editing avr-source in emacs editor. Advantages of using Cygwin? One enviroment - multiple target platforms (actually I have crosses for avr, h8s and SH). -- Best Regards from Poland Medenes
Reply by Sebastian Schildt January 27, 20042004-01-27
harshit wrote:

> To add I am talking of the AVR Studio 3.5. It says on the site that it > supports assembly. > So does it support C and is it Free? > thanks
AVR Studio has only the assembler integrated. With AVRStudio 4.08 it is possible to debug C Code. You have to program in another environment, but the resulting object File can be download into AVR Studios Simulator. When using GCCs "extcoff" Format AVRStudio 4.08 is able to debug on the C-Leve, e.g. you step through C Functions not assembly. Beware: AVRStudio versions prior to 4.08 can not do this (They will only show you the assembler code your compiler generated). This is the only "free" solution I'm aware off. MfG Sebastian -- If you see light at the end of a wormhole it is most likely a photon torpedo.