Reply by gugo January 15, 20042004-01-15
Hi.
Less war and begins constructive answers..

FOR FREE PIC BOOK, what do you think about?
BETER THAN SUCH PICTUTOR

FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE
FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE

http://www.mikroelektronika.co.yu/english/product/books/PICbook/0_Uvod.htm


FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE
FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE

saludos
gugo-.

moocowmoo wrote:
> "Neil" <a@b.c> wrote in message news:52jNb.15380$De.7229@edtnps84... > >>"david" <im@fedup.com> wrote in message >>news:bu4d7d$ble$1@titan.btinternet.com... >> >>>>If the whinging poms ever pass a CAN-SPAM act maybe he'll go >> >>away. >> >>>>N >>> >>>LOL british and proud of it :-) >> >>Well, you do make good biscuits (cookies), instead of 80 varieties of >>chocolate chip and 90 varieties of Oreos! Mind you, I never could get >>my Canadian buddies to try toad in the hole or curried baked beans. >> >>NM >> >> > > My serving suggestion for serving toad-in-the-hole to those ex-colonials is > to call it "pigs-in-a-blanket" and let them pour maple syrup over it. > > Peter > > >
Reply by moocowmoo January 15, 20042004-01-15
"Neil" <a@b.c> wrote in message news:52jNb.15380$De.7229@edtnps84...
> > "david" <im@fedup.com> wrote in message > news:bu4d7d$ble$1@titan.btinternet.com... > > > If the whinging poms ever pass a CAN-SPAM act maybe he'll go > away. > > > > > > N > > LOL british and proud of it :-) > > Well, you do make good biscuits (cookies), instead of 80 varieties of > chocolate chip and 90 varieties of Oreos! Mind you, I never could get > my Canadian buddies to try toad in the hole or curried baked beans. > > NM > >
My serving suggestion for serving toad-in-the-hole to those ex-colonials is to call it "pigs-in-a-blanket" and let them pour maple syrup over it. Peter
Reply by Neil January 14, 20042004-01-14
"david" <im@fedup.com> wrote in message
news:bu4d7d$ble$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> > If the whinging poms ever pass a CAN-SPAM act maybe he'll go
away.
> > > > N > LOL british and proud of it :-)
Well, you do make good biscuits (cookies), instead of 80 varieties of chocolate chip and 90 varieties of Oreos! Mind you, I never could get my Canadian buddies to try toad in the hole or curried baked beans. NM
Reply by david January 14, 20042004-01-14
> If the whinging poms ever pass a CAN-SPAM act maybe he'll go away. > > N
LOL british and proud of it :-)
Reply by Neil January 14, 20042004-01-14
"Bob Stephens" <stephensdigital@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:38cewdzrcx8w$.1o6v6wto1l0a5$.dlg@40tude.net...

> This pathetic company has been spamming and falsely promoting their
third
> rate products for two decades to my knowledge with apparently no
end in
> sight. > Bob
If the whinging poms ever pass a CAN-SPAM act maybe he'll go away. N
Reply by Bob Stephens January 14, 20042004-01-14
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC), Odd Erling N. Eriksen wrote:

> Path: newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!elnk-atl-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail > From: "Odd Erling N. Eriksen" <odderi@pvv.org> > Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,alt.microcontrollers.8bit,comp.arch.embedded.picbasic,comp.arch.embedded.piclist,comp.sys.m6809 > Subject: Re: Microchip PIC Microcontroller Self Study > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC) > Organization: Norwegian university of science and technology > Lines: 17 > Sender: Odd Eriksen <odderi@bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no> > Message-ID: <bu3896$if6$1@tyfon.itea.ntnu.no> > References: <459bd40e.0401131156.347ff1f1@posting.google.com> > NNTP-Posting-Host: bacchus.pvv.ntnu.no > X-Trace: tyfon.itea.ntnu.no 1074078822 18918 129.241.210.178 (14 Jan 2004 11:13:42 GMT) > X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no > NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC) > User-Agent: tin/1.4.6-20020816 ("Aerials") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.8-RELEASE (i386)) > Xref: news.earthlink.net comp.arch.embedded:171363 alt.microcontrollers.8bit:10500 comp.arch.embedded.picbasic:7596 comp.arch.embedded.piclist:75068 comp.sys.m6809:4405 > X-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 03:13:43 PST (newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net) > > In comp.arch.embedded JOHN <john@pixelectronix.com> wrote: >> I have found PIC Tutor from following company to be easy to learn. > > <spam snipped> > > -Hm, funny that both the domain you recommended and the one you posted > from is registered by the same company. > > Sigh. One would think the art of spamming had advanced far enough to make > usenet spam attempts more subtle.
This pathetic company has been spamming and falsely promoting their third rate products for two decades to my knowledge with apparently no end in sight. Bob
Reply by david January 14, 20042004-01-14
> > I agree but I wont repost his link :-( > > Thanks. That's why I deleted it. >
mind you we all no what not to buy then :-) If we slate all the spammers will they go away. I doubt it .but It will make harder for them to stay in business if don't buy anything from them ! or they could advertise as themselves and not try to con us. David
Reply by Odd Eriksen January 14, 20042004-01-14
In comp.arch.embedded JOHN <john@pixelectronix.com> wrote:
> I have found PIC Tutor from following company to be easy to learn.
<spam snipped> -Hm, funny that both the domain you recommended and the one you posted from is registered by the same company. Sigh. One would think the art of spamming had advanced far enough to make usenet spam attempts more subtle. -- 73 de LB1LF Odd Erling, ARK Programmers never die: They just GOSUB without RETURN.
Reply by Tim H. January 13, 20042004-01-13
"david" <im@fedup.com> wrote in message
news:bu1upn$g24$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> > > > Blatant spamming > I agree but I wont repost his link :-(
How about a REAL tutorial? http://picmcu.netfirms.com/tut-pic.html Granted, it's for the older 16C(F)84 but still relevant. And I take no credit for it; I just HTML-ized it. -Tim
> >
Reply by Neil January 13, 20042004-01-13
"david" <im@fedup.com> wrote in message
news:bu1upn$g24$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> > > > Blatant spamming > I agree but I wont repost his link :-(
Thanks. That's why I deleted it. N