Reply by Adrian Buehlmann●February 18, 20052005-02-18
My experience is that it's better not to waste your time trying to use
a UML tool for code generation.
Nevertheless the UML diagrams can be a great help thinking about or
discussing parts of your software with others.
A good UML diagram editor is important. It must be fast and easy to use
and support embedding of your diagrams in your text processing software
(like Word on Windows).
Adrian
--
http://www.cadifra.com - Fast and lightweight UML Editor for Windows
Reply by Martin Kaul●February 16, 20052005-02-16
Peter Hermann wrote:
> In comp.software-eng Martin Kaul <mkaul@leuze.de> wrote:
>
>>Take a look at http://www.oose.de/umltools.htm
>
>
> Martin
>
> precious hint: this is a great list (even Artisan is there)
This list was the reason we found Artisan - now we use it ;-)
regards
Martin
Reply by Peter Hermann●February 16, 20052005-02-16
In comp.software-eng Martin Kaul <mkaul@leuze.de> wrote:
Martin
precious hint: this is a great list (even Artisan is there)
Maybe they think about inverting that table into "portrait"
because a table of 1000 width x 20 height might not be practical.
--
--Peter Hermann(49)0711-685-3611 fax3758 ica2ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de
--Pfaffenwaldring 27 Raum 114, D-70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen
--http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/homes/ph/
--Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney)
Reply by Martin Kaul●February 15, 20052005-02-15
Mertiof wrote:
> I have many years C++ experience but I am novice in UML. I learn and use the
> UML in embedded real-time application development.
>
> Can some proficient UML users help me by showing a comparison table of some
> sort so that I can decide which UML tool I should select for real-time C++
> applications? AND/OR Share your experience with your UML tools?
WinA&D is very strong on UML for embedded, real-time systems with features like
full UML modeling, multi-task design, requirements management, C++ code
generation and reengineering of existing C++ to UML class diagrams and
dictionary (using WinTranslator). You can find product descriptions, screen
shots and pricing at www.excelsoftware.com. Excel Software provide free
technical support by phone and email so after looking over the web site, email
any WinA&D questions to info@excelsoftware.com.
Mertiof wrote:
> I have many years C++ experience but I am novice in UML. I learn and use the
> UML in embedded real-time application development.
>
> Can some proficient UML users help me by showing a comparison table of some
> sort so that I can decide which UML tool I should select for real-time C++
> applications? AND/OR Share your experience with your UML tools?
Reply by ●February 11, 20052005-02-11
I've used Rose for many years. Lately the only support we receive
is the support bill, and after it was aquired by IBM it's near
to impossible to get in contact with the support pages on the net.
I would not buy it again....
In article <420b0f9f$0$14096$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>, <Mertiof>
says...
> I have many years C++ experience but I am novice in UML. I learn and use the
> UML in embedded real-time application development.
>
> Can some proficient UML users help me by showing a comparison table of some
> sort so that I can decide which UML tool I should select for real-time C++
> applications? AND/OR Share your experience with your UML tools?
>
>
>
Reply by Brett Foster●February 10, 20052005-02-10
Mertiof wrote:
> I have many years C++ experience but I am novice in UML. I learn and use the
> UML in embedded real-time application development.
>
> Can some proficient UML users help me by showing a comparison table of some
> sort so that I can decide which UML tool I should select for real-time C++
> applications? AND/OR Share your experience with your UML tools?
>
>
Of course there is Argo UML...
http://argouml.tigris.org/
I don't have anything really nice to say about the tool. It was one of
those tools that pushed everybody's buttons. The commercial version was
definitely better, and much more polished. I always got the feeling that
the developers of the non commercial version of the product fell in to
the trap of never being satisfied and kept rewriting parts... and that's
why it's at version 0.16.1.
Brett