Reply by Sandra July 27, 20052005-07-27
hi everyone,

at first, thanks for responding, that=B4s really helpful.

@rob: what do you exactly mean with "The Geode is not exactly an ideal
processor for real-time use"?
Is that restricted to any specific devices (in the given link, the
problem occured with the graphical output. in my application, we don=B4t
need vga, it=B4s just for testing).=20

greetings,
sandra

Reply by Steve July 23, 20052005-07-23
"Heikki Orsila" <user@host.invalid> wrote in message 
news:dbtl35$596$1@news.cc.tut.fi...
> In comp.realtime Steve <nospam_steved94@comcast.net> wrote: >> I know that one signficant difference between RTLinux and RTAI is $$$. >> RTAI is free. > > Please learn to quote other people. It is very confusing if you don't > prefix quoted lines with ">". >
Sorry. I have no idea why my reader (Outlook Express) didn't do this automagically. I have it set up to do so, and I see that it did prefix quoted lines in this reply. Steve
> -- > Heikki Orsila Barbie's law: > heikki.orsila@iki.fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!" > http://www.iki.fi/shd
Reply by Armin Steinhoff July 23, 20052005-07-23
Hello Sandra,

Sandra wrote:
> Hi folks, > > I need some advice: > > For my diploma thesis, I need an embedded PC with CAN, RS232, Ethernet, > RT OS and low power consumption (for use with battery). > > Finally, I found a system, that would fit best, but the problem is, > that it just includes standard linux support. (it&#4294967295;s an embedded pc > system from janz, with NS Geode GX1, 300MHz, > http://www.janz.de/as/files/empcx302.pdf ) > And have got really no experience with RTAI or RTLinux(and just a few > experience with Linux itself). Does anybody know, how much work it > would take to extend the system? And what would be better, RTAI or > RTLinux? > > Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?
For the RTOS part .. you have simply to talk to QNX Germany in Hannover. QNX Momentics (the development system) is free for universities after signing some agreements. We can also deliver different CAN controller boards (PC/104, IS, PCI) inclusive QNX6.3 support. Good low power embedded CPUs are e.g. these PC/104 CPU boards http://www.ampltd.com/prod/t886.html or http://www.technoland.com/tl_pc104_cputm5800.htm --Armin http://www.steinhoff-automation.com
Reply by Heikki Orsila July 23, 20052005-07-23
In comp.realtime Steve <nospam_steved94@comcast.net> wrote:
> I know that one signficant difference between RTLinux and RTAI is $$$. > RTAI is free.
Please learn to quote other people. It is very confusing if you don't prefix quoted lines with ">". -- Heikki Orsila Barbie's law: heikki.orsila@iki.fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!" http://www.iki.fi/shd
Reply by Grant Edwards July 23, 20052005-07-23
On 2005-07-23, Steve <nospam_steved94@comcast.net> wrote:

> For my diploma thesis, I need an embedded PC with CAN, RS232, Ethernet, > RT OS and low power consumption (for use with battery). > > Finally, I found a system, that would fit best, but the problem is, > that it just includes standard linux support. (it&#4294967295;s an embedded pc > system from janz, with NS Geode GX1, 300MHz, > http://www.janz.de/as/files/empcx302.pdf )
Perhaps eCos will run on it -- it runs on other PC-compatible motherboards. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! After this, I'm going at to BURN some RUBBER!! visi.com
Reply by Steve July 22, 20052005-07-22
"Sandra" <sandra.theidel@ixi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote in message 
news:1122036408.509261.302980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Hi folks,

I need some advice:

For my diploma thesis, I need an embedded PC with CAN, RS232, Ethernet,
RT OS and  low power consumption (for use with battery).

Finally, I found a system, that would fit best, but the problem is,
that it just includes standard linux support. (it&#4294967295;s an embedded pc
system from janz, with NS Geode GX1, 300MHz,
http://www.janz.de/as/files/empcx302.pdf )
And have got really no experience with RTAI or RTLinux(and just a few
experience with Linux itself). Does anybody know, how much work it
would take to extend the system? And what would be better, RTAI or
RTLinux?

Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?

Thanks a lot,
Sandra


I know that one signficant difference between RTLinux and RTAI is $$$.
RTAI is free.

Steve



Reply by Heikki Orsila July 22, 20052005-07-22
In comp.realtime Heikki Orsila <user@host.invalid> wrote:
> In comp.realtime Sandra <sandra.theidel@ixi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?
> eCos is one alternative.
And many more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTOS -- Heikki Orsila Barbie's law: heikki.orsila@iki.fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!" http://www.iki.fi/shd
Reply by July 22, 20052005-07-22
In article <1122036408.509261.302980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
	"Sandra" <sandra.theidel@ixi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
> Hi folks, > I need some advice: > For my diploma thesis, I need an embedded PC with CAN, RS232, Ethernet, > RT OS and low power consumption (for use with battery). > Finally, I found a system, that would fit best, but the problem is, > that it just includes standard linux support. (it&#4294967295;s an embedded pc > system from janz, with NS Geode GX1, 300MHz, > http://www.janz.de/as/files/empcx302.pdf )
Careful! The Geode is not exactly an ideal processor for real-time use. (see for example: https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2004-March/006661.html)
> And have got really no experience with RTAI or RTLinux(and just a few > experience with Linux itself). Does anybody know, how much work it > would take to extend the system?
Last time I looked, you had to get the kernel source, apply a patch, configure & build your own kernel. Piece of cake if you are used to patching and building Linux kernels but can be a nightmare if this is all new to you.
> And what would be better, RTAI or > RTLinux?
I'd personally prefer RTAI because I think the poeple on the RTAI mailing list tend to be more helpful, and because I don't like the RTLinux patent. But that's just my personal taste ...
> Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?
<shameless plug> My company sells an embedded Linux tool suite which comes with RTAI preconfigured, plus some samples (see my .sig). </shameless plug> HTH Rob -- Robert Kaiser email: rkaiser AT sysgo DOT com SYSGO AG http://www.elinos.com Klein-Winternheim / Germany http://www.sysgo.com
Reply by Heikki Orsila July 22, 20052005-07-22
In comp.realtime Sandra <sandra.theidel@ixi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?
eCos is one alternative. It was designed to be a real-time embedded operating system. It's also open source. http://ecos.sourceware.org/ -- Heikki Orsila Barbie's law: heikki.orsila@iki.fi "Math is hard, let's go shopping!" http://www.iki.fi/shd
Reply by Sandra July 22, 20052005-07-22
Hi folks,

I need some advice:

For my diploma thesis, I need an embedded PC with CAN, RS232, Ethernet,
RT OS and  low power consumption (for use with battery).

Finally, I found a system, that would fit best, but the problem is,
that it just includes standard linux support. (it=B4s an embedded pc
system from janz, with NS Geode GX1, 300MHz,
http://www.janz.de/as/files/empcx302.pdf )
And have got really no experience with RTAI or RTLinux(and just a few
experience with Linux itself). Does anybody know, how much work it
would take to extend the system? And what would be better, RTAI or
RTLinux?

Or does anyone know an embedded system, that already includes a RT OS?

Thanks a lot,
Sandra