Reply by Arie de Muynck●December 1, 20052005-12-01
"Grant Edwards" ...
> On 2005-11-30, Rosie...
> > Altera is looking for Sr. Applications Engr.
> > ...........
> And this has what, exactly, to do with multi-drop networks?
Well, the message was dropped in this networked group 3 times...
Arie de Muynck
And this has what, exactly, to do with multi-drop networks?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! You should all JUMP
at UP AND DOWN for TWO HOURS
visi.com while I decide on a NEW
CAREER!!
Processing power is cheaper than high speed interfaces.
Can you compress the data by a factor of 3?
Reply by Rene Tschaggelar●November 9, 20052005-11-09
Ted wrote:
> Paul Carpenter wrote:
>
>
>
>>Personally at these rates either use as someone else has said PC104plus for
>>higher bandwidth.
>
>
> No problem.
>
>
>>Then consider 100baseT network and accept the uncertainty factor,
>
>
> Its not a real time issue, its a "20 port switches for industrial
> temperature ranges cost serious money" issue.
I recently got a 16port 10/100Mbit Switch at FRYs for 20$,
possibly not industrial temperature range.
Rene
--
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
Reply by Anton Erasmus●November 8, 20052005-11-08
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:31:42 +0100, Rene Tschaggelar <none@none.net>
wrote:
>Ted wrote:
>> I'm looking for a networking technology with the following requirements
>>
>>
>> 1. Multidrop.No hub/router/switch
>> 2. Up to 20 nodes
>> 3. Transfer rate > 3MBytes/s
>> 5. Supported by an off-the-shelf PC104 type card for an industrial PC
>> (master)
>> 5. Easy to implement in HW (slave)
>>
>>
>> Anyone got any ideas? CANBus comes close, but isn't fast enough.
>
>With simple selfmade hardware this specification is
>doable. As physical medium choose RS422, RS485, LVDS,
>all on twisted pair. A separate clock line allows
>synchroneous hardware. As serializer/deserializer,
>have a look at CPLDs & Serdes.
>
TI makes a number of serdes chips.
Maybe IEEE 1399 is an option ? Upto 63 devices may be daisy chained
and the data rate is 400Mb/s. Cable length between devices are only
upto 4.5m. It looks like one of the variants based on this core
technology should handle your requirements.
Regards
Anton Erasmus
Reply by Ted●November 8, 20052005-11-08
Meindert Sprang wrote:
> > Its not a real time issue, its a "20 port switches for industrial
> > temperature ranges cost serious money" issue.
> And developing your own interface from scratch isn't?
I've got no interest at all in developing an interface from
scratch.Thats why I'm asking here.
Although if it meant saving the cost of a 20 port Ethernet switch in
each machine I'd give it serious consideration.
TW
Reply by Meindert Sprang●November 8, 20052005-11-08
"Ted" <ted.wood@sortex.com> wrote in message
news:1131448317.622174.182400@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Its not a real time issue, its a "20 port switches for industrial
> temperature ranges cost serious money" issue.
And developing your own interface from scratch isn't?
Meindert