Reply by gillesrobichon●February 4, 20092009-02-04
--- In l..., Kenneth Crudup wrote:
yes indeed, seems to be a problem to make the difference between 2
processors, so I imagine making the difference between 2 processors
revisions is impossible :=)
> Be careful when looking at NXP's datasheets for
"Read Part Identification"; > I noticed that some user-manual revisions (likely
old) have the same part > numbers for similarly-sized 213X and 214X parts,
which I hope is an error. >
> -Kenny
>
> --
> Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles > O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809
(888) 454-8181 >
Reply by Kenneth Crudup●February 4, 20092009-02-04
Be careful when looking at NXP's datasheets for "Read Part
Identification";
I noticed that some user-manual revisions (likely old) have the same part
numbers for similarly-sized 213X and 214X parts, which I hope is an error.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181
Reply by gillesrobichon●February 4, 20092009-02-04
I'm looking for a way to read the revision of the LPC2210 used in our
product, Rev.A or Rev.B
NXP doc mentions a way to read CPU ID
Command "J"
Return Code CMD_SUCCESS followed by part identification number in
ASCII format.
Description This command is used to read the part identification
number.
Example "J"
In case of a LPC2210/2220, an answer to a read Part ID command is
0x0301FF12
(5046248210).
has anyone been able to read down to the revision ID of the chipset,
I'm interested to read whether this is a RevA or RevB,