> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:59:11 -0700, Donald <donald@dontdoithere.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> Is there a MSP430 with USB ? - plenty of 80C51 variants with USB, at
>>>1/12/480Mbd.....
>>>
>>
>> Whick 80c51 variant has 480Mb ??
>>
>>
>
>
> Cypress FX2 has full 480Mbit/sec
WOW, thank you.
donald
Reply by Vic●December 16, 20052005-12-16
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:59:11 -0700, Donald <donald@dontdoithere.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Is there a MSP430 with USB ? - plenty of 80C51 variants with USB, at
>> 1/12/480Mbd.....
>>
> Whick 80c51 variant has 480Mb ??
>
>
Cypress FX2 has full 480Mbit/sec
>> -jg
>>
Reply by Donald●December 16, 20052005-12-16
Jim Granville wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>
>> I very much would not recommend using any 8051 variant, considering
>> what is now available. Those are very inefficient processors that
>> offer nothing other than their ubiquity.
>>
>> The MSP suggested below is a good choice for low power apps, but runs
>> at only 8Mhz (16MHz for a few).
>
>
> Is there a MSP430 with USB ? - plenty of 80C51 variants with USB, at
> 1/12/480Mbd.....
>
Whick 80c51 variant has 480Mb ??
> Also, you'll find SPI _and_ UART are sparse/non existant on the smaller
> MSP430's
>
> -jg
>
Reply by Ian Bell●December 16, 20052005-12-16
Andrew wrote:
> I very much would not recommend using any 8051 variant, considering what
> is
> now available. Those are very inefficient processors that offer nothing
> other than their ubiquity.
>
First, please do not top post.
Second the 8051, despite its age, is still the most used 8 bit
microcontroller. It is not inefficient - it has many bit level instructions
ideal for embedded applications and the fastest variants are capable of 100
MIPS.
Ian
Reply by Jim Granville●December 16, 20052005-12-16
Andrew wrote:
> I very much would not recommend using any 8051 variant, considering what is
> now available. Those are very inefficient processors that offer nothing
> other than their ubiquity.
>
> The MSP suggested below is a good choice for low power apps, but runs at
> only 8Mhz (16MHz for a few).
Is there a MSP430 with USB ? - plenty of 80C51 variants with USB, at
1/12/480Mbd.....
Also, you'll find SPI _and_ UART are sparse/non existant on the
smaller MSP430's
-jg
Reply by Andrew●December 16, 20052005-12-16
I very much would not recommend using any 8051 variant, considering what is
now available. Those are very inefficient processors that offer nothing
other than their ubiquity.
The MSP suggested below is a good choice for low power apps, but runs at
only 8Mhz (16MHz for a few).
"Ian Bell" <ruffrecords@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dnmh2m$15n$1@slavica.ukpost.com...
> johannblake@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> With so many different types of microcontrollers and manufacturers on
>> the market, it is rather difficult to know where to begin.
>>
>> What I need is something that has the following features:
>>
>> * very small in size
>> * very low power consumption
>> * at least 64 k of storage purely for storing data (this is in addition
>> to my program's space)
>> * some sort of interface to connect the microcontroller to a PC (RS232,
>> USB, etc) to allow the microcontroller app to transfer logged data.
>> * an interface to communicate with a serial peripheral (RS232 would
>> probably do)
>> * low cost or free Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with
>> debugging capabilities
>> * low cost or free C or Basic compiler (or some other high level
>> language)
>> * low cost hardware kit for flashing the microcontroller and debugging
>>
>> The applications running on the microcontroller will generally be
>> small. Also, if it isn't possible to have at least 64 k of built-in
>> memory, I can live with adding the memory externally but the
>> enhancement should be easy to do.
>>
>> Can anyone please make any suggestions on any products / manufacturers
>> that have what I am looking for.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Johann Blake
>
> Try the 8052. There are lots of variants but they all share a common basic
> tion set architecture and instruction set. There are lots of cheap
> develpment kits around most of which include a free compiler/assembler for
> programs up to 4K bytes in size.
>
> You could start at
>
> www.8052.com
>
> Ian
Reply by Ian Bell●December 15, 20052005-12-15
Kadir Solid Gold Suleyman wrote:
> MCF5282 eval board from axman.com
> *< 1w
> *64k ram on chip + flash
> *rs232, CAN Ethernet
> *gdb from ocdemon.com with insight tcl/tk wrapper
> *gcc
> *$149 wiggler cable for flashing microcontroller and debugging
Maybe I am missing something but I can find no reference to Insight or
ocdemon on the axman website.
And the price is listed as $329 which with the $149 for the wiggler cable
makes it a tad expensive.
Ian
Reply by Kadir Solid Gold Suleyman●December 14, 20052005-12-14
MCF5282 eval board from axman.com
*< 1w
*64k ram on chip + flash
*rs232, CAN Ethernet
*gdb from ocdemon.com with insight tcl/tk wrapper
*gcc
*$149 wiggler cable for flashing microcontroller and debugging
Reply by Ulf Samuelsson●December 14, 20052005-12-14
<johannblake@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:1134568890.479669.36710@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> You mentioned that the IAR C compiler is free of charge. I couldn't
> find any information about this on IAR's web site nor could I even find
> a download for just the compiler. Can you provide more information
> please.
>
You mentioned that the IAR C compiler is free of charge. I couldn't
find any information about this on IAR's web site nor could I even find
a download for just the compiler. Can you provide more information
please.
Thanks
Johann