Reply by Lady Chatterly●November 15, 20042004-11-15
In article <6c289e8a.0411140211.28f3abff@posting.google.com> si767676@hotmail.com (Simon) wrote:
>
>Hi Gary,
>
>Thanks for your reply. Sorry if I wasn't clear but when I said my
>program that wrote to EEPROM was was unsuccessful, I meant an earlier
>program that uses the procedure outlined in the 16F88 datasheet - uses
>EEADR EEDATA and EECON registers.
Are you often sorry?
>The code that I posted in my original message simply writes the value
>BB with MOVLW, MOVWF instructions and there is no problem with this.
>In the simulator, you see 'BB' appear as the value in count1.
Can you provide examples?
>The reason had I replaced Microchip's MOVF ADDR,W line with my own
>using movlw was because I had allocated ADDR a location in bank0
>(using the cblock directive). However I have now tweaked the code -
>ADDR is located at 110 which is the same bank as EEADR so I can leave
>Microchip's code completely unaltered.
What makes you so positive?
>You're right, I was trying voodoo to make my program work - I had
>tried everything logical I could think of but without success. Hence
>why I am posting here.
Why does it make you curious to be posting here?
>And yes as far as I know I am using CBLOCK correctly. (From the MPASM
>manual:
>> Use this directive in place of or in addition to the equ directive. When creating non-relocatable (absolute) code, cblock is often used to define variable address location names. Do not use cblock or equ to define variable location names for relocatable code. )
Do you ask if you know they are using cblock correctly?
>Have I understood this correctly? In the watch window, the count1
>register shows its address as 0020, as expected.
As a result of the many conflicts, no, there were no official Olympics
after 2004. However, it appears they may be revived in 2040.
>If anyone else thinks the code looks OK, I'd be very grateful if you
>could try assembling it and stepping through the simulator - see if
>you get the same issue that I have.
The civil war in the United States will start in 2004. I would
describe it as having a Waco type event every month that steadily
gets worse. The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and
end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.
>Thank you.
Bill clinton.
>So here is the second version of the code, with the unedited version
>of Microchip's code to read the EEPROM ...
There is one example of a theory involving "time shells" progressing
in size and intensity around a gravitational point from all matter.
The more massive the object, the larger and more influential the time
shells around it (like an onion). Another offshoot of this theory is
that kinetic energy is actually the conversion of stored energy in
the atom as it passes through time shells in a gravitational field.
John Titor spoke of this when he last visited.
Cynics regard everybody as equally corrupt. Idealists regard everybody
as equally corrupt, except themselves.
>cblock h'20' ;
>count1
>count2
> endc
Will you stand by your friends always?
>cblock h'110' ; I have put this register at 110
>ADDR ; so that it is in the same bank as
> endc ; the EEADR SFR.
> ; So that I can leave the Microchip code exactly
> ; unchanged
Love makes the time pass. Time makes love pass.
>GOTO INITIALISE
> NOP
> NOP
> NOP
Advice should be viewed from behind.
>INITIALISE
Why are you apologizing?
>banksel eedata ; Clearing these registers first to make it
> ; easier to spot changes in Watch
>Window
> clrf eedata
> clrf eeadr
> clrf addr
> banksel count1
> clrf count1
> clrf count2
While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you,
you willfully eat poisoned food, buy manufactured products no one
needs and turn an uncaring eye away from millions of people suffering
and dying all around you. Is this the "Universal Law" you subscribe
to?
>movlw h'BB' ; Put value 'BB' in count1
> movwf count1 ; this appears successfully in watch window
> movlw count1 ; Move the location of count1 to W
> banksel addr ; (appears in watch as h'20' as expected)
> movwf addr ; and put that value in the ADDR register
>
>read_eeprom ; This section of code taken from 16F88 datasheet
The most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is that if they
foul up there's no law against whacking them around a little.
>BANKSEL EEADR ; Select Bank of EEADR
> MOVF ADDR,W ;
> MOVWF EEADR ; Data Memory Address to read
> ; In watch window, EEADR succesfully contains
> ; h'20' at this point
Suddenly, Kerry becomes this God like hero.
>BANKSEL EECON1 ; Select Bank of EECON1
> BCF EECON1,EEPGD ; Point to Data memory
> BSF EECON1,RD ; EE Read
> BANKSEL EEDATA ; Select Bank of EEDATA
> ; In watch window, at this point, the value
> ; of EEDATA changes to h'FF'
Our computers are connected through an electrical bus. Three computers
linked together use the same signals from the gravity sensors and
clocks, using a Borda error correcting protocol for checking
integrity of the data and tripping the VGL system.
>MOVF EEDATA,W ; W = EEDATA
Are you positive that is why?
>; check to see if data read successful
> banksel count2
> movwf count2 ; move the data value to count2
Can you tell me if it rained in New York on June 4th 1932? You are
from their future so should you know that?
>goto $
> end
Heck, we haven't even touched on "Z" field compression yet.
--
Lady Chatterly
"Second Admission that Lady Chatterly kicked your ass noted, Kenny
Kakes." -- Daedalus
Reply by Gary Kato●November 14, 20042004-11-14
>p.s. Incidentally I was also puzzled by the __config directive of the
>16F88 - apparently it has 2 config words unlike most of the PIC16X
>series that only have one.
>When I first started using the 16F88, my
>single line __config directive gave an error (Argument out of range
>(not a valid config register address)). So I had a look at the
>p16f88.inc file in the MPCHIP_Tools folder and looked at the MPLAB
>help file. So now I use the format:
>__config _config1, _hs_osc......
>__config _config2, _IESO_ON & .......
>Although the MPASM help file only explicitly says that is necessary on
>the PIC18C devices.
>Anyway, it works for me that way!
Ah. You must have turned off case sensitivity. I still have that on, so the
config statements gave me errors. I then set the config options using the
Configure->Configuration Bits menu item in MPLAB. It is better to have the bits
specified in the source code so that there can be a record of it on printouts
in case your PC crashes and burns.
Reply by Simon●November 14, 20042004-11-14
You're absolutely correct - I was confused between EEPROM and general
purpose registers. I thought they were one and the same thing.
So thank you for your help. I have now got the EEPROM read and write
working 100%.
I have also now realised that the task I originally set out to do is
much simpler than I thought - I should have read up on "Indirect
Addressing, INDF and FSR Registers" in the first place.
Still it's all useful stuff to be learning.
Best wishes,
Simon.
p.s. Incidentally I was also puzzled by the __config directive of the
16F88 - apparently it has 2 config words unlike most of the PIC16X
series that only have one. When I first started using the 16F88, my
single line __config directive gave an error (Argument out of range
(not a valid config register address)). So I had a look at the
p16f88.inc file in the MPCHIP_Tools folder and looked at the MPLAB
help file. So now I use the format:
__config _config1, _hs_osc......
__config _config2, _IESO_ON & .......
Although the MPASM help file only explicitly says that is necessary on
the PIC18C devices.
Anyway, it works for me that way!
garykato@aol.com (Gary Kato) wrote in message news:<20041114055727.07087.00000593@mb-m10.aol.com>...
> I think you are confusing EEPROM with the File Registers. Their adresses
> overlap each other. When you do this:
>
> movlw h'BB'
> movwf count1
>
> You are moving BB into the File Register at location 20. This is not altering
> EEPROM which can only be addressed using the EEADR register.
>
> When you read from EEPROM location 20, this is a different place than File
> Register location 20. This is why you get FF instead of BB.
>
> You can change the values in simulated EEPROM by using the EEPROM window. In
> MPLAB, look under the View menu and you will see EEPROM. This will open a
> window showing you what is in the EEPROM. This will initially be all FF. If you
> run your code to read_eeprom, you will see that address 20 in the File Register
> window will change to BB, but address 20 in the EEPROM window will not change.
> Click on address 20 in the EEPROM window and you can manually change the value.
> You will then find that your EEPROM read code will work.
Reply by Sergio Masci●November 14, 20042004-11-14
Gary Kato <garykato@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041114055727.07087.00000593@mb-m10.aol.com...
> I think you are confusing EEPROM with the File Registers. Their adresses
> overlap each other. When you do this:
>
> movlw h'BB'
> movwf count1
>
> You are moving BB into the File Register at location 20. This is not
altering
> EEPROM which can only be addressed using the EEADR register.
>
> When you read from EEPROM location 20, this is a different place than File
> Register location 20. This is why you get FF instead of BB.
>
> You can change the values in simulated EEPROM by using the EEPROM window.
In
> MPLAB, look under the View menu and you will see EEPROM. This will open a
> window showing you what is in the EEPROM. This will initially be all FF.
If you
> run your code to read_eeprom, you will see that address 20 in the File
Register
> window will change to BB, but address 20 in the EEPROM window will not
change.
> Click on address 20 in the EEPROM window and you can manually change the
value.
> You will then find that your EEPROM read code will work.
I think Gary has nailed this.
Think about it this way: you have 368 bytes of RAM on the 16f88, you also
have 256 bytes of data EEPROM which are seperate to your RAM. If you write
to address $20 in RAM it goes to RAM and not to EEPROM, if you write to
address $20 in EEPROM it goes to EEPROM and not to RAM. Address $20 is a
different location for both devices.
Regards
Sergio Masci
Reply by Gary Kato●November 14, 20042004-11-14
I think you are confusing EEPROM with the File Registers. Their adresses
overlap each other. When you do this:
movlw h'BB'
movwf count1
You are moving BB into the File Register at location 20. This is not altering
EEPROM which can only be addressed using the EEADR register.
When you read from EEPROM location 20, this is a different place than File
Register location 20. This is why you get FF instead of BB.
You can change the values in simulated EEPROM by using the EEPROM window. In
MPLAB, look under the View menu and you will see EEPROM. This will open a
window showing you what is in the EEPROM. This will initially be all FF. If you
run your code to read_eeprom, you will see that address 20 in the File Register
window will change to BB, but address 20 in the EEPROM window will not change.
Click on address 20 in the EEPROM window and you can manually change the value.
You will then find that your EEPROM read code will work.
Reply by Simon●November 14, 20042004-11-14
Hi Gary,
Thanks for your reply. Sorry if I wasn't clear but when I said my
program that wrote to EEPROM was was unsuccessful, I meant an earlier
program that uses the procedure outlined in the 16F88 datasheet - uses
EEADR EEDATA and EECON registers.
The code that I posted in my original message simply writes the value
BB with MOVLW, MOVWF instructions and there is no problem with this.
In the simulator, you see 'BB' appear as the value in count1.
The reason had I replaced Microchip's MOVF ADDR,W line with my own
using movlw was because I had allocated ADDR a location in bank0
(using the cblock directive). However I have now tweaked the code -
ADDR is located at 110 which is the same bank as EEADR so I can leave
Microchip's code completely unaltered.
You're right, I was trying voodoo to make my program work - I had
tried everything logical I could think of but without success. Hence
why I am posting here.
And yes as far as I know I am using CBLOCK correctly. (From the MPASM
manual:
> Use this directive in place of or in addition to the equ directive. When creating non-relocatable (absolute) code, cblock is often used to define variable address location names. Do not use cblock or equ to define variable location names for relocatable code. )
Have I understood this correctly? In the watch window, the count1
register shows its address as 0020, as expected.
If anyone else thinks the code looks OK, I'd be very grateful if you
could try assembling it and stepping through the simulator - see if
you get the same issue that I have.
Thank you.
So here is the second version of the code, with the unedited version
of Microchip's code to read the EEPROM ...
LIST N=90,ST=OFF,p=16F88
INCLUDE P16f88.INC ;Register definitions
errorlevel 0,-302
__config _config1, _hs_osc & _wdt_off & _pwrte_on & _cp_off &
_boden_off & _CCP1_RB0 & _WRT_PROTECT_OFF & _CPD_OFF & _LVP_OFF
__config _config2, _IESO_ON & _FCMEN_ON
cblock h'20' ;
count1
count2
endc
cblock h'110' ; I have put this register at 110
ADDR ; so that it is in the same bank as
endc ; the EEADR SFR.
; So that I can leave the Microchip code exactly
; unchanged
GOTO INITIALISE
NOP
NOP
NOP
INITIALISE
banksel eedata ; Clearing these registers first to make it
; easier to spot changes in Watch
Window
clrf eedata
clrf eeadr
clrf addr
banksel count1
clrf count1
clrf count2
movlw h'BB' ; Put value 'BB' in count1
movwf count1 ; this appears successfully in watch window
movlw count1 ; Move the location of count1 to W
banksel addr ; (appears in watch as h'20' as expected)
movwf addr ; and put that value in the ADDR register
read_eeprom ; This section of code taken from 16F88 datasheet
BANKSEL EEADR ; Select Bank of EEADR
MOVF ADDR,W ;
MOVWF EEADR ; Data Memory Address to read
; In watch window, EEADR succesfully contains
; h'20' at this point
BANKSEL EECON1 ; Select Bank of EECON1
BCF EECON1,EEPGD ; Point to Data memory
BSF EECON1,RD ; EE Read
BANKSEL EEDATA ; Select Bank of EEDATA
; In watch window, at this point, the value
; of EEDATA changes to h'FF'
MOVF EEDATA,W ; W = EEDATA
; check to see if data read successful
banksel count2
movwf count2 ; move the data value to count2
goto $
end
garykato@aol.com (Gary Kato) wrote in message news:<20041113214939.07586.00000665@mb-m01.aol.com>...
> >I was unsuccessful getting my program to work writing Eeprom, so
> >decided to start at the beginning and try to get the simpler process
> >of reading Eeprom to work first then I'd move onto writing.
>
> If your write was unsuccessful, why do you expect to read BB from that EEPROM
> location? If the write failed, you probably would get FF when you read. I
> didn't see anything wrong with your read code except for your substituting
> "mowlf count1" with "movwlf H'20'". That smacks of voodoo programming where you
> don't understand what is heppening and you are just guessing at what is causing
> problems. If you look at the code generated for the instruction (listing or in
> a debugger/simulator) then you could see if using the symbol count1 was loading
> the correct value into W.
>
> It's been a while since I used PIC assembly, but is cblok the right directive
> to use for allocating EEPROM memory?
Reply by Gary Kato●November 14, 20042004-11-14
>I have used the sample code from Microchip's datasheet.
I missed reading that you were using the simulator already. I assume you
changed the EEPROM location in MPLAB before running your program.
The code you pasted into your original message didn't assemble correctly for
me. The __config statements had to be commented out as they seem to belong to a
PIC18. I set the config bits using MPLAB's menu instead.
The code worked for me. Are you sure you are looking at the right window for
the result? You should be looking at the FILE REGISTERS window, not the EEPROM
window.
Reply by Gary Kato●November 13, 20042004-11-13
>I was unsuccessful getting my program to work writing Eeprom, so
>decided to start at the beginning and try to get the simpler process
>of reading Eeprom to work first then I'd move onto writing.
If your write was unsuccessful, why do you expect to read BB from that EEPROM
location? If the write failed, you probably would get FF when you read. I
didn't see anything wrong with your read code except for your substituting
"mowlf count1" with "movwlf H'20'". That smacks of voodoo programming where you
don't understand what is heppening and you are just guessing at what is causing
problems. If you look at the code generated for the instruction (listing or in
a debugger/simulator) then you could see if using the symbol count1 was loading
the correct value into W.
It's been a while since I used PIC assembly, but is cblok the right directive
to use for allocating EEPROM memory?
Reply by Simon●November 13, 20042004-11-13
Sergio,
Thanks for your reply. At the moment, I am only trying to read the
data Eeprom. I started out this project trying to write to Eeprom,
and that is where the procedure involving writing 0x55 and 0xAA that
you refer to comes into play.
I was unsuccessful getting my program to work writing Eeprom, so
decided to start at the beginning and try to get the simpler process
of reading Eeprom to work first then I'd move onto writing. As far as
I understand the datasheet, I have followed its instructions
accurately for writing to Eeprom - the main bit of the code I use is
taken directly from the datasheet.
My suspicion was that my problems were caused by some kind of memory
bank issue, but I've looked into every angle that I could think of and
am still stuck. I think I must have overlooked something obvious.
Any more ideas?
Thanks,
Simon.
"Sergio Masci" <sergio@NO.SPAM.xcprod.com> wrote in message news:<41965207$0$1158$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>...
> Hi Simon,
>
> The data EEPROM is protected from accidental corruption by use of a
> protocol. You need to write 0x55 and 0xAA to special function register
> before writing to the EEPROM. I cannot remember the details off the top of
> my head. Look at the 16f88 data sheet, there are flowcharts and code samples
> that show you exactly what you should be doing. Read the explanation
> carefully.
>
> Regards
> Sergio Masci
>
> http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB - optimising PIC compiler
> FREE for personal non-commercial use
Reply by Sergio Masci●November 13, 20042004-11-13
Simon <si767676@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c289e8a.0411130940.75fe5ac4@posting.google.com...
> I have been trying to use the read data EEPROM feature of the 16F88,
> but can't get it to work.
>
> I have used the sample code from Microchip's datasheet. Attached is
> the (entire) ASM file that I am using. It should (I had hoped) store
> the value h'BB' in the register count1. Then read it from the data
> EEPROM location (h'20') and store it into the register count2.
>
> When I step through it in the simulator, the EEDATA register gets the
> value h'FF' instead of h'BB'. I can't figure this out and have spent
> many hours on it so would be very grateful if someone could help.
>
> Code follows...
>
>
> LIST N=90,ST=OFF,p=16F88
> INCLUDE P16f88.INC ;Register definitions
> errorlevel 0,-302
> __config _config1, _hs_osc & _wdt_off & _pwrte_on & _cp_off &
> _boden_off & _CCP1_RB0 & _WRT_PROTECT_OFF & _CPD_OFF & _LVP_OFF
> __config _config2, _IESO_ON & _FCMEN_ON
>
>
> cblock h'20' ;
> count1
> count2
> ADDR
> endc
>
>
> GOTO INITIALISE
> NOP
> NOP
> NOP
>
> INITIALISE
>
> banksel eedata ; Clearing these registers first to make it easier
> ; to see what's going on in Watch Window
> clrf eedata
> clrf eeadr
>
> banksel count1
> clrf count1
> clrf count2
> movlw h'BB'
> movwf count1
>
> read_eeprom ; This section of code taken from 16F88 datasheet
> BANKSEL EEADR ; Select Bank of EEADR
>
> ; MOVF ADDR,W ; I replaced this line with the literal value
> h'20'
> movlw h'20' ; (which is the address of count1) for the
> purposes of
> ; troubleshooting
>
> MOVWF EEADR ; Data Memory Address to read
> BANKSEL EECON1 ; Select Bank of EECON1
> BCF EECON1,EEPGD ; Point to Data memory
> BSF EECON1,RD ; EE Read
> BANKSEL EEDATA ; Select Bank of EEDATA
> MOVF EEDATA,W ; W = EEDATA
>
> ; check to see if data read successful
> banksel count2
> movwf count2 ; move the data value to count2
>
> goto $
> end
Hi Simon,
The data EEPROM is protected from accidental corruption by use of a
protocol. You need to write 0x55 and 0xAA to special function register
before writing to the EEPROM. I cannot remember the details off the top of
my head. Look at the 16f88 data sheet, there are flowcharts and code samples
that show you exactly what you should be doing. Read the explanation
carefully.
Regards
Sergio Masci
http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB - optimising PIC compiler
FREE for personal non-commercial use