Reply by Meindert Sprang November 18, 20042004-11-18
"Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@NOSPAMatmel.com> wrote in message
news:3032g4F2pdgmbU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > No need to wait, the parts are sampling and there is a development board
as
> well..
Well, if they're sampled right now, who will guarantee I can run production in 4 weeks (we have very short development times in our small company :-)) ? Meindert
Reply by Ulf Samuelsson November 18, 20042004-11-18
> After my post I remembered an e-mail I recently received from our > local distributor: 3.16 euro for the AT91SAM7S32 and 4.57 euro for the > AT91SAM7S64, both in 100 units. So that's a good and cheap solution. > > > If you can fit the latch in your design, why complain? > > Well, I can fit it in, but the routing requires as much extra board space
as
> required by the latch and SRAM. And it leaves me no room for expansion of > the design.
So having it integrated is worth some money then :-)
> But these new ARM mcu's are just the solution I was looking for. > The moment they're available here in the Netherlands, I'll design them in. >
No need to wait, the parts are sampling and there is a development board as well..
> Regards, > Meindert
-- Best Regards Ulf at atmel dot com These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Sweden.
Reply by Meindert Sprang November 17, 20042004-11-17
"Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@atmel.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:2vvehsF2r4pa1U1@uni-berlin.de...
> 3,20 Euro * 1,3 = = $4,16. > Might work for the AT91SAM7S64 w 16 kB.
I know. After my post I remembered an e-mail I recently received from our local distributor: 3.16 euro for the AT91SAM7S32 and 4.57 euro for the AT91SAM7S64, both in 100 units. So that's a good and cheap solution.
> If you can fit the latch in your design, why complain?
Well, I can fit it in, but the routing requires as much extra board space as required by the latch and SRAM. And it leaves me no room for expansion of the design. But these new ARM mcu's are just the solution I was looking for. The moment they're available here in the Netherlands, I'll design them in. Regards, Meindert
Reply by Ulf Samuelsson November 16, 20042004-11-16
> > It is not longer a good idea to use "Many mainstream microcontrollers" > in > > applications requiring > > medium sized SRAMs, since the 0,18u and lower embedded flash processes > > allows > > you to cost effectively integrate 32-64 kB of SRAM. > > The AT91SAM7S series will be available in > > 32kF+8kR,64kF+16kR, 128kF+&#4294967295;32kR, 256kF+64kR etc. > > Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to
be
> > fixed to 128kB in most parts. > > Let me see: my application requires appr. 6000-8000 units/year. > The Mega162 costs me 2.35 euro, the latch appr. 0.10 euro and the SRAM
0,75
> euro. That adds up to 3.20 euro. I haven't had an offer for an ARM type > controller for that price yet. > > Meindert >
3,20 Euro * 1,3 = = $4,16. Might work for the AT91SAM7S64 w 16 kB. If you can fit the latch in your design, why complain? -- Best Regards, Ulf Samuelsson ulf@a-t-m-e-l.com This is a personal view which may or may not be share by my Employer Atmel Nordic AB
Reply by Lewin A.R.W. Edwards November 16, 20042004-11-16
Hi Ulf,

> The AT91SAM7S series will be available in > 32kF+8kR,64kF+16kR, 128kF+&#4294967295;32kR, 256kF+64kR etc.
Just so you know, we are looking very hard at these parts in our migration away from horrible legacy 8-bit micros. I'm trying to get managerial permission to port one or two simple projects to ARM in order to pave the way for other projects.
> Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to be
We hate Philips :)
> With low cost ARM toolsets around the corner it is maybe time to to move on
Is there something new coming out soon? If you want to forward me any info, you know my email address...
Reply by Meindert Sprang November 16, 20042004-11-16
"R Adsett" <radsett@junk.aeolusdevelopment.cm> wrote in message
news:etudndHdM7NplAfcRVn-uA@rogers.com...
> In article <10pjbr7dnuh3pbc@corp.supernews.com>, > mhsprang@NOcustomSPAMware.nl says... > > "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@NOSPAMatmel.com> wrote in message > > news:2vsp89F2pqsrqU1@uni-berlin.de... > > > Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to
be
> > > fixed to 128kB in most parts. > > > > I read the datasheet briefly and I vaguely rember a post in this ng
about
> > it: does the LPC have no form of code protection? > > > Yes and no. The 2104, 2105 and 2106 variants to not. AFAIK the rest do.
I wonder how Philips is going to get some market share with this..... Meindert
Reply by R Adsett November 16, 20042004-11-16
In article <10pjbr7dnuh3pbc@corp.supernews.com>, 
mhsprang@NOcustomSPAMware.nl says...
> "Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@NOSPAMatmel.com> wrote in message > news:2vsp89F2pqsrqU1@uni-berlin.de... > > Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to be > > fixed to 128kB in most parts. > > I read the datasheet briefly and I vaguely rember a post in this ng about > it: does the LPC have no form of code protection? >
Yes and no. The 2104, 2105 and 2106 variants to not. AFAIK the rest do. Robert
Reply by Meindert Sprang November 16, 20042004-11-16
"Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@NOSPAMatmel.com> wrote in message
news:2vsp89F2pqsrqU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to be > fixed to 128kB in most parts.
I read the datasheet briefly and I vaguely rember a post in this ng about it: does the LPC have no form of code protection? Meindert
Reply by Meindert Sprang November 16, 20042004-11-16
"Ulf Samuelsson" <ulf@NOSPAMatmel.com> wrote in message
news:2vsp89F2pqsrqU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > It is not longer a good idea to use "Many mainstream microcontrollers"
in
> applications requiring > medium sized SRAMs, since the 0,18u and lower embedded flash processes > allows > you to cost effectively integrate 32-64 kB of SRAM. > The AT91SAM7S series will be available in > 32kF+8kR,64kF+16kR, 128kF+&#4294967295;32kR, 256kF+64kR etc. > Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to be > fixed to 128kB in most parts.
Let me see: my application requires appr. 6000-8000 units/year. The Mega162 costs me 2.35 euro, the latch appr. 0.10 euro and the SRAM 0,75 euro. That adds up to 3.20 euro. I haven't had an offer for an ARM type controller for that price yet. Meindert
Reply by Ulf Samuelsson November 15, 20042004-11-15
"Meindert Sprang" <mhsprang@NOcustomSPAMware.nl> skrev i meddelandet
news:10p97p7j06kbf68@corp.supernews.com...
> Hi all, > > Many mainstream microcontrollers have an external multiplexed memory bus. > They all require a latch to connect an SRAM chip. One would expect there > would be a manufacturer who sells SRAMs in 8k or 32kbyte size with a bus > that connects glueless to these micro's but I cannot find such a device.
Do
> they exist? > > Meindert >
It is not longer a good idea to use "Many mainstream microcontrollers" in applications requiring medium sized SRAMs, since the 0,18u and lower embedded flash processes allows you to cost effectively integrate 32-64 kB of SRAM. The AT91SAM7S series will be available in 32kF+8kR,64kF+16kR, 128kF+&#4294967295;32kR, 256kF+64kR etc. Philips LPC has similar combinations, although the flash size seems to be fixed to 128kB in most parts. With low cost ARM toolsets around the corner it is maybe time to to move on guys :-) -- Best Regards Ulf at atmel dot com These comments are intended to be my own opinion and they may, or may not be shared by my employer, Atmel Sweden.