Funny, I guess some RAM needs are greater than others. I am looking at info on a 144 processor array on a chip that amounts to a super computer and the total on chip RAM is around 9 kWords. Of course more can be added externally, but it seems like a pretty interesting chip. http://www.greenarrays.com

Rick

--- In A..., Nick Howes wrote:
>
> "Chris DeLise" chrisd@... wrote:
>
> > I chose the 7X because they had both an Ethernet MAC and 128KB RAM. After several years, it's still the only part out there with that much RAM.
>
> I wholeheartedly agree. We use the AT91SAM7XC512 and although the Cortex parts look interesting, they don't have enough RAM to be useful to me.
>
> - Nick
>

"Chris DeLise" c...@delise.com wrote:

> I chose the 7X because they had both an Ethernet MAC and 128KB RAM. After several years, it's still the only part out there with that much RAM.

I wholeheartedly agree. We use the AT91SAM7XC512 and although the Cortex parts look interesting, they don't have enough RAM to be useful to me.

- Nick

I agree, we do love working with the 7X, we run the 256 and the 512 in
two different products.

Thanks,

Terry

From: A... [mailto:A...] On Behalf
Of Chris DeLise
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:23 AM
To: A...
Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter

It's funny, I chose the 7X because they had both an Ethernet MAC and
128KB RAM. After several years, it's still the only part out there with
that much RAM. None of the Cortex products out there seem to have as
much, so the 7X reigns. I agree, it is hard to support. I've gotten a
lot of hints by reading this group... - Chris
On 11/12/2010 6:59 AM, gnuarm wrote:

Hi Terry,

I looked at your company's web site in security products. How do
you use the AT91SAM devices? If you are using the 7X part, I would guess
you are using the Ethernet interface.

Do you have much interest in the new CM3 parts that are coming
out?

Rick

--- In A...
, "Terry Densmore"
wrote:
>
> I could not agree more, I do not use this group much but I do
feel your pain with interaction. The community should engage in more
dialog, it can only help things! I can remember working with the SAM7X
right as it came out and it was such a bear to get going due to lack of
support.
>
> Thanks,
> Terry
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A...
on behalf of Kamal
> Sent: Thu 11/11/2010 6:42 PM
> To: A...

> Subject: RE: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and
transmitter
>
>
>
>
> I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank
you.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A...
[mailto:A...
] On Behalf Of Bogdan Marinescu
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
> To: A...

> Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and
transmitter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a)
establish a new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which
is low, I don't know why people don't share source or snippets more
often), and (b) start a conversation: what resources are out there, so I
could hear about new ones or confirm the lack thereof.
>
> If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even
a thank you and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's
pretty rude and you won't be getting any more help from me and (b)
you've confirmed for me that this group is deader than disco.
>
>
> Disco is dead ???!?!
>

Hey Rick,

We had moved to the 7X with that intention but we sadly never
implemented it....I haven't put much time into checking out the CM3. We
are looking to move to the 9263 possibly some time next year.

Thanks,

Terry

From: A... [mailto:A...] On Behalf
Of gnuarm
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 6:59 AM
To: A...
Subject: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter

Hi Terry,

I looked at your company's web site in security products. How do you use
the AT91SAM devices? If you are using the 7X part, I would guess you are
using the Ethernet interface.

Do you have much interest in the new CM3 parts that are coming out?

Rick

--- In A... ,
"Terry Densmore" wrote:
>
> I could not agree more, I do not use this group much but I do feel
your pain with interaction. The community should engage in more dialog,
it can only help things! I can remember working with the SAM7X right as
it came out and it was such a bear to get going due to lack of support.
>
> Thanks,
> Terry
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A... on
behalf of Kamal
> Sent: Thu 11/11/2010 6:42 PM
> To: A...
> Subject: RE: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and
transmitter
> I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A...
[mailto:A... ] On
Behalf Of Bogdan Marinescu
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
> To: A...
> Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and
transmitter
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:
> By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a)
establish a new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which
is low, I don't know why people don't share source or snippets more
often), and (b) start a conversation: what resources are out there, so I
could hear about new ones or confirm the lack thereof.
>
> If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a thank
you and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's pretty rude
and you won't be getting any more help from me and (b) you've confirmed
for me that this group is deader than disco.
> Disco is dead ???!?!
>

It's funny, I chose the 7X because they had both an Ethernet MAC and
128KB RAM. After several years, it's still the only part out there with
that much RAM. None of the Cortex products out there seem to have as
much, so the 7X reigns. I agree, it is hard to support. I've gotten a
lot of hints by reading this group... - Chris
On 11/12/2010 6:59 AM, gnuarm wrote:
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> I looked at your company's web site in security products. How do you
> use the AT91SAM devices? If you are using the 7X part, I would guess
> you are using the Ethernet interface.
>
> Do you have much interest in the new CM3 parts that are coming out?
>
> Rick
>
> --- In A... ,
> "Terry Densmore" wrote:
> >
> > I could not agree more, I do not use this group much but I do feel
> your pain with interaction. The community should engage in more
> dialog, it can only help things! I can remember working with the SAM7X
> right as it came out and it was such a bear to get going due to lack
> of support.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Terry
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: A... on
> behalf of Kamal
> > Sent: Thu 11/11/2010 6:42 PM
> > To: A...
> > Subject: RE: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: A...
> [mailto:A... ] On
> Behalf Of Bogdan Marinescu
> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
> > To: A...
> > Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a)
> establish a new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group
> (which is low, I don't know why people don't share source or snippets
> more often), and (b) start a conversation: what resources are out
> there, so I could hear about new ones or confirm the lack thereof.
> >
> > If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a
> thank you and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's
> pretty rude and you won't be getting any more help from me and (b)
> you've confirmed for me that this group is deader than disco.
> >
> >
> > Disco is dead ???!?!
> >

I could not agree more, I do not use this group much but I do feel your pain with interaction. The community should engage in more dialog, it can only help things! I can remember working with the SAM7X right as it came out and it was such a bear to get going due to lack of support.

Thanks,
Terry

________________________________

From: A... on behalf of Kamal
Sent: Thu 11/11/2010 6:42 PM
To: A...
Subject: RE: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter

I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank you.

________________________________

From: A... [mailto:A...] On Behalf Of Bogdan Marinescu
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
To: A...
Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:

By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a) establish a new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which is low, I don't know why people don't share source or snippets more often), and (b) start a conversation: what resources are out there, so I could hear about new ones or confirm the lack thereof.

If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a thank you and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's pretty rude and you won't be getting any more help from me and (b) you've confirmed for me that this group is deader than disco.
Disco is dead ???!?!

Hi Terry,

I looked at your company's web site in security products. How do you use the AT91SAM devices? If you are using the 7X part, I would guess you are using the Ethernet interface.

Do you have much interest in the new CM3 parts that are coming out?

Rick
--- In A..., "Terry Densmore" wrote:
>
> I could not agree more, I do not use this group much but I do feel your pain with interaction. The community should engage in more dialog, it can only help things! I can remember working with the SAM7X right as it came out and it was such a bear to get going due to lack of support.
>
> Thanks,
> Terry
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A... on behalf of Kamal
> Sent: Thu 11/11/2010 6:42 PM
> To: A...
> Subject: RE: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter
>
>
> I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank you.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: A... [mailto:A...] On Behalf Of Bogdan Marinescu
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
> To: A...
> Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:
>
>
> By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a) establish a new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which is low, I don't know why people don't share source or snippets more often), and (b) start a conversation: what resources are out there, so I could hear about new ones or confirm the lack thereof.
>
> If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a thank you and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's pretty rude and you won't be getting any more help from me and (b) you've confirmed for me that this group is deader than disco.
> Disco is dead ???!?!
>

I am with you on this. On behalf of others and myself thank you.

_____

From: A... [mailto:A...] On Behalf Of
Bogdan Marinescu
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:30 PM
To: A...
Subject: Re: [AT91SAM] Re: Reg:AT91SAM9263 UART RECeiver and transmitter

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:

By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a) establish a
new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which is low, I don't
know why people don't share source or snippets more often), and (b) start a
conversation: what resources are out there, so I could hear about new ones
or confirm the lack thereof.

If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a thank you
and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's pretty rude and you
won't be getting any more help from me and (b) you've confirmed for me that
this group is deader than disco.
Disco is dead ???!?!

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, riceman0 wrote:

>
> By the way, I was generous with my source code in order to (a) establish a
> new precedent, elevate the helpfulness of this group (which is low, I don't
> know why people don't share source or snippets more often), and (b) start a
> conversation: what resources are out there, so I could hear about new ones
> or confirm the lack thereof.
>
> If you have just used my source code and disappeared w/o even a thank you
> and ignoring my attempt at conversation, then (a) that's pretty rude and you
> won't be getting any more help from me and (b) you've confirmed for me that
> this group is deader than disco.
>

Disco is dead ???!?!