Reply by rickman September 3, 20062006-09-03
werty wrote:
> R U cross posting again! Everytime you do , you forget to > read the text in the post ! > > Acoustic coupler has nothing to do with USBh/480 ... > Please pay attention next time you post ....
Doo U have a sense of HUMOR? He was making a joke because the other poster left off the M in front of the Bits/sec.
> I saw Samsungs EVAL Board ( ARM cpu , as in all PDAs ) and > they wanted $1000 , now > > www.littlechips.com has about same thing for > > $300 !! > They show a 2.5" HDD attached in a 2nd photo .... > > The ARM cpu will destroy the PC and Gates and Linus ....
> > > USBh/480 = USB Host at 480bits/sec > > > > Gosh, you could use an acoustic coupler!
Reply by CBFalconer September 3, 20062006-09-03
werty wrote:
> > R U cross posting again! Everytime you do , you forget to > read the text in the post !
You are continuing to top-post and use ridiculous shorthand, after being advised not to. I do not need to read this junk. PLONK -- Some informative links: news:news.announce.newusers http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Reply by werty September 3, 20062006-09-03
 R U cross posting again!  Everytime you do , you forget to
read the text in the post !

 Acoustic coupler has nothing to do with  USBh/480 ...
  Please pay attention next time you post ....



   I saw  Samsungs  EVAL Board ( ARM cpu ,  as in all PDAs ) and
   they wanted $1000 , now

       www.littlechips.com has about same thing for

   $300  !!
 They show a 2.5" HDD attached in a 2nd photo ....

 The ARM cpu will destroy the PC and Gates and Linus ....



 Bill gates did not give credit , so why should we ?
 He did not create anything , he bought rights ( this is unethical
,sets
 up motive to steal property of others ) and applied for 12,761 patents
....

 Bill dont do software , niether does linus . ......
________________________________________________________________









cs_posting@hotmail.com wrote:
> werty wrote: > > I need USB high speed , but i'd really like to NOT > > say USB high speed , because it is unintuitive !!. > > > > HIGH SPEED COMPARED TO WHAT ?!!! > > > > Just more sales BS . Why do we let these > > Luddites create our language !!! > > This the proper way to say ............. > > > > USBh/480 = USB Host at 480bits/sec > > Gosh, you could use an acoustic coupler!
Reply by werty September 3, 20062006-09-03
 R U cross posting again!  Everytime you do , you forget to
read the text in the post !

 Acoustic coupler has nothing to do with  USBh/480 ...
  Please pay attention next time you post ....



   I saw  Samsungs  EVAL Board ( ARM cpu ,  as in all PDAs ) and
   they wanted $1000 , now

       www.littlechips.com has about same thing for

   $300  !!
 They show a 2.5" HDD attached in a 2nd photo ....

 The ARM cpu will destroy the PC and Gates and Linus ....



________________________________________________________________









cs_posting@hotmail.com wrote:
> werty wrote: > > I need USB high speed , but i'd really like to NOT > > say USB high speed , because it is unintuitive !!. > > > > HIGH SPEED COMPARED TO WHAT ?!!! > > > > Just more sales BS . Why do we let these > > Luddites create our language !!! > > This the proper way to say ............. > > > > USBh/480 = USB Host at 480bits/sec > > Gosh, you could use an acoustic coupler!
Reply by September 3, 20062006-09-03
werty wrote:
> I need USB high speed , but i'd really like to NOT > say USB high speed , because it is unintuitive !!. > > HIGH SPEED COMPARED TO WHAT ?!!! > > Just more sales BS . Why do we let these > Luddites create our language !!! > This the proper way to say ............. > > USBh/480 = USB Host at 480bits/sec
Gosh, you could use an acoustic coupler!
Reply by werty September 3, 20062006-09-03
 I need USB high speed , but i'd really like to NOT
 say  USB high speed , because it is unintuitive !!.

 HIGH SPEED COMPARED TO WHAT ?!!!

  Just more sales BS .  Why do we let these
 Luddites create our language !!!
   This the proper way to say .............

   USBh/480      =  USB Host at 480bits/sec

 _____________________________________________________




rickman wrote:
> Mouarf wrote: > > > Do you realize that anything that is USB 1.1 conforming and works at > > > full speed? A USB 1.1 hub will work with USB 2.0 host and device at > > > full speed, just not high speed. > > > > > > > > > yes I do realize but my app needs high speed transfer to work correctly so > > a USB1.1 isolation is not enough for the application to work properly... > > It is a common misconception to think that saying USB 2.0 is the same > as saying USB High Speed. It may be true that USB 1.0 and 1.1 did not > have High Speed and that USB 2.0 does have high speed, but USB 2.0 also > has Low Speed and Full Speed. So saying USB 2.0 says nothing about the > speed. > > If you need High Speed, you should say USB High Speed. It is the USB > 2.0 that is then implied, not the other way around.
Reply by Elan Magavi August 23, 20062006-08-23
"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:44E9D6FD.F7DAF576@yahoo.com...
> Elan Magavi wrote: >> "Michael N. Moran" <mike@mnmoran.org> wrote in message >>> Mouarf wrote: >> >>>>> If you need High Speed, you should say USB High Speed. It is the USB >>>>> 2.0 that is then implied, not the other way around. >>>> >>>> Take a look at my first post, I told about High Speed... >>> >>> -- "I need such product for USB high speed or at least USB full speed. " >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> It seems that USB 1.1 satisfies the "at least" part. >>> >>> Michael N. Moran (h) 770 516 7918 >>> 5009 Old Field Ct. (c) 678 521 5460 >>> Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org >>> >>> "So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains >>> and we never even know we have the key." >>> The Eagles, "Already Gone" >>> >>> The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1 >> >> Pathetc.. you guys spent more time with etiquette and nitpciking than >> helping. > > Who says we are here to help? Our purpose is to carp and fuss > about foolish misuse of usenet, such as failure to snip (horrible > example above) and lack of precision.
As long as that is clear. however, you will easily find worse offenders elsewhere.
Reply by Michael N. Moran August 21, 20062006-08-21
CBFalconer wrote:
> Elan Magavi wrote: > >>"Michael N. Moran" <mike@mnmoran.org> wrote in message >>> >>>-- "I need such product for USB high speed or at least USB full speed. " >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>It seems that USB 1.1 satisfies the "at least" part.
> Who says we are here to help? Our purpose is to carp and fuss > about foolish misuse of usenet, such as failure to snip (horrible > example above) and lack of precision.
Appologies for the "lack of precision" with my cut paste in the .sig ... that was ugly. -- Michael N. Moran (h) 770 516 7918 5009 Old Field Ct. (c) 678 521 5460 Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org "So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains and we never even know we have the key." The Eagles, "Already Gone" The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1
Reply by CBFalconer August 21, 20062006-08-21
Elan Magavi wrote:
> "Michael N. Moran" <mike@mnmoran.org> wrote in message >> Mouarf wrote: > >>>> If you need High Speed, you should say USB High Speed. It is the USB >>>> 2.0 that is then implied, not the other way around. >>> >>> Take a look at my first post, I told about High Speed... >> >> -- "I need such product for USB high speed or at least USB full speed. " >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> It seems that USB 1.1 satisfies the "at least" part. >> >> Michael N. Moran (h) 770 516 7918 >> 5009 Old Field Ct. (c) 678 521 5460 >> Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org >> >> "So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains >> and we never even know we have the key." >> The Eagles, "Already Gone" >> >> The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1 > > Pathetc.. you guys spent more time with etiquette and nitpciking than > helping.
Who says we are here to help? Our purpose is to carp and fuss about foolish misuse of usenet, such as failure to snip (horrible example above) and lack of precision. The sacrifice of at least one rooster on the block is necessary before any help can be offered. Better results are had with sheep, and even better a bull. Without us all is chaos. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@maineline.net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE maineline address!
Reply by Elan Magavi August 21, 20062006-08-21
"Michael N. Moran" <mike@mnmoran.org> wrote in message 
news:TogGg.40255$Uq1.26343@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> Mouarf wrote: >>> If you need High Speed, you should say USB High Speed. It is the USB >>> 2.0 that is then implied, not the other way around. >> >> >> Take a look at my first post, I told about High Speed... > > > -- "I need such product for USB high speed or at least USB full speed. " > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > It seems that USB 1.1 satisfies the "at least" part. > > > Michael N. Moran (h) 770 516 7918 > 5009 Old Field Ct. (c) 678 521 5460 > Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org > > "So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains > and we never even know we have the key." > The Eagles, "Already Gone" > > The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1 >
Pathetc.. you guys spent more time with etiquette and nitpciking than helping.