The replacement part Cliff is thinking of is
the 16F628, which is pin compatible with the 16F84, but adds more peripherials,
can run without a xtal or RC, adds a USART, supports ICSP, and cost about half
the price of the 16F84.
----- Original Message -----
From: Cliff Griffin
To: p...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [piclist] Differences betwen PIC16F84 and
PIC16F84A
The A parts are a new CMOS version, and are cheaper to
mfr., and therefore cheaper to buy. They also have a different programming
requirement...and my expereince with the '876 parts is that the A
versions program significantly faster with fewer errors.
FWIW,
if you are looking into either of these chips, I would recommend a different chip all together. I think it's the '672, but I'm
probably wrong...either way, there's a new one out that's
cheaper, and has more features. (More memory, at the least.) I haven't
memorized the part number because I haven't been working with projects
simple enough for them.
Cliff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mohammad Ibnu Malik" <a...@yahoo.com> To:
<p...@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 6:16 PM Subject: [piclist] Differences betwen PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A> Dear
Groups > Please explain to me, what's the deference(s) between > PIC16F84 and PIC16F84A ? > > Regards > >
Malik > > __________________________________________________>
to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the instructions > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
to unsubscribe, go to http://www.yahoogroups.com and follow the
instructions
">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|