Reply by Patrick Meuser-Bianca April 15, 20082008-04-15
Didi,

Detractors, tractors, and co-factors... 8-)  I trust your concern, but as 
long as we know that anythin in- has the following power factor to 
translate:

P=Nc^2/V

I amount of information should be ideally nothing to most of them, their 
Preying Manits feeders...  If we are to say information is the ability to 
change work.  But truly, you may want to check out Uribe on this, because 
its practically impossible whether or not to say one is a devil's advocate 
or another is a wolf in sheep's clothing, for what power exists nonetheless 
to change information, and as we would all be finite state automatons at any 
one point in time, the indexes in time that we could exist reach from this 
power to infinity from what I can surmise as what contributes to one's 
valuable representation over the volume of another's expression in order to 
add one in the time that another NAN is conditional:

http://bcl.ece.uiuc.edu/Uribe/index.htm Tractatus Paradoxico-Philosophicus

Paradoxial nonetheless, I've my own take on it though, you may feel free to 
see:

http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=239 Paradoxial Logic

In order to clear them all.

Respects,

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info

"Didi" <dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in message 
news:7b5d4645-ee39-49da-9321-cd697f4430d9@8g2000hsu.googlegroups.com...
> Glad to see you in good health. You are still honoring my post of > the two only, though. While I feel flattered I also feel injustice has > been done towards Patrick ... are you sure you are OK lately? > > Dimiter > > CBFalconer wrote: >> Didi wrote: >> > >> > Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick >> > Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a neglect? >> > Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you? >> > Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up. >> >> Sorry. >> >> Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed >> with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all >> irrelevant material. See the following links: >> >> -- >> <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html> >> <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html> >> <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html> >> <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google) >> <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers) >> >> >> ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Reply by Andrew Smallshaw April 14, 20082008-04-14
On 2008-04-11, Didi <dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote:
> Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick > Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a neglect? > Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you? > Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up.
Personally I didn't even realise that he _had_ top posted. Page after page of meaningless gibberish just turns you off instantly - the last thing you are going to do is go right down to the bootm to look for a previous post. -- Andrew Smallshaw andrews@sdf.lonestar.org
Reply by Boudewijn Dijkstra April 14, 20082008-04-14
Op Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:47:17 +0200 schreef Patrick Meuser-Bianca  
<pmeuser-bianca@usag-ac.info>:
> All I asked was what a good free assembler was.
No you didn't. You placed specific requirements on the functionalities provided by the assembler. Requirements that are so full of ambiguities, that they are impossible to understand for someone that isn't you, given a reasonable maximum effort.
> It's pretty bad when the > internet in the state that I get it, is so ephermeral
Aren't "states" always ephemeral in this context?
> esp. malware, malevolent responses, and exploitative > practices by which such links are set.
Which links?
> So please save your criticism for a different domain. > Obviously you've never been weaned off oil or coal.
Or air. But I fail to see the relation.
> Nonetheless.
Allthemore. -- Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Reply by Didi April 13, 20082008-04-13
Glad to see you in good health. You are still honoring my post of
the two only, though. While I feel flattered I also feel injustice has
been done towards Patrick ... are you sure you are OK lately?

Dimiter

CBFalconer wrote:
> Didi wrote: > > > > Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick > > Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a neglect? > > Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you? > > Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up. > > Sorry. > > Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed > with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all > irrelevant material. See the following links: > > -- > <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html> > <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html> > <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html> > <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google) > <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers) > > > ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Reply by Paul E. Bennett April 12, 20082008-04-12
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:

> I'm aiming to do a self-diagnostic method for a model dialogue range on > optional domains for unified plural clauses by Intel x86 assembly for a > task-independent systemology or basic routines for conference calling. > What is a good assembler that is freely bound to domain specific routes > for metaphorical expansions of the huge model memory intrinsics ie. no > docs needed, as for which the SALT model [Fredkin] could be > re-iterated? > > I'd be as well looking for any self-diagnostic code, macros, or sample > the same by the 80186 to first generation Pentium known for floating > point malfunctionality ie. embedded multi-tasking for portable > synchronization for ZV video simulations involving a nano-bud > structure for a robust recovery routine. > > PQ, > > Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" > Cyberneticist > http://www.usag-ac.info
Google you must "80186 Assembler free" you search and enter press Thousands of links there be. ;> -- ******************************************************************** Paul E. Bennett...............<email://Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> Forth based HIDECS Consultancy Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972 Tel: +44 (0)1235-811095 Going Forth Safely ..... EBA. www.electric-boat-association.org.uk.. ********************************************************************
Reply by CBFalconer April 12, 20082008-04-12
Didi wrote:
> > Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick > Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a neglect? > Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you? > Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up.
Sorry. Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all irrelevant material. See the following links: -- <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html> <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html> <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html> <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google) <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers) ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Reply by John Devereux April 11, 20082008-04-11
Didi <dp@tgi-sci.com> writes:

> Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick > Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a neglect? > Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you? > Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up.
My eyes glazed over before I had scrolled far enough down to notice... [...] -- John Devereux
Reply by Didi April 11, 20082008-04-11
Hey, where is the anty-top posting squad? What has Patrick
Meuser-Bianca done to deserve such a  neglect?
Chuck, are you in good health? The rest of the army? Where are you?
Hopefully *my* top posting will wake you all up.

Dimiter

Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
> I am sure that by the work that I've been seeking to accompish can be > unified however the respit to what measure of confiscation and losses to the > intent that these types of replies reflect. I've been entered into this, > situation, where noone is able to make sense of what I say, or has been > somehow influenced as to detract from its meaning. So that the powers that > be can enter their own little time-frame to the essence of these recoveries > for data that has either been transmuted or deleted from my computer, the > situation is as well described to the inflitration of my true association by > the expectation that Intel would actually surmount to develop their own > 80888, a RISC chip for what this such an effort as this, parallels in > register independence as I've known since about 1988. However latent within > the twenty year time-frame that the ZV video port had been established for > the more agile of these chip-sets to be non-exist in this cyber-space you > suggest since. It's by which the problems I've realized could as well be a > role-playing game to establish a following in some degree or order of the > same for physical existence, not just logical or virtual even as to the > nature of this datum or how even has it meed modified to be completely > different either way. The diction of fiction is that which it is either > ordered or not doesn't extend the full spectrum to this game of musical > chairs either, should these suspiciouns smoe how 'meet up' with the mind for > decorum exists in which constructive communication is known. > > And I refuse to let you imply that I am ordering something based on a > completely different forum, where the discussion is even prevented on > sci.physics.relativity or sci.physics.discrete as to the nature of this > goal. So you can go till blue in the face that an adaptive-predicitive > algorithgm for the generation of notes a-f has a g that implies the expasion > of a symbology for instance that would prove the modula by the face of the > moon, and the development of these degrees of misinformation and > disinformation for which the music has actually superposed to the same > effect of a mindscape or likewise to explore your interest in Star Trek > wither with or witho out me. As to whom these characters are, I don't > expect the hyper-mechanical relationship of my theory of gravim > (electromagnetism and gravity) to ever change, so nor would I exchange how > these people have been spoofing me esp. through tele-marketing, to ever > change as to the degree of such information as has been modified to the > sheer number of you detractors as to the actual pivots to those who will > face justice for their charges. > > Why I've received messages to my own e-mail from myself prior and if you are > if you are implying this I wouldn't do in the future, then I am no more > complicit to a devil's advocate than I would be the devil himself to suggest > life as such to send them. Or introduce a sitution where anyone or anybody > could be more or less confused in order to play a role. > > Anyways as for what this message means, for you little wanna be demons, here > goes. Simulate a faulty Pentium with the ZV irregardless the order of > political psychology for what main-stream media could be processed with the > embedded design of a 80186 (as an embedded logic) in order to show and prove > the nano-bud relationship as they've been escaping justice, or otherwise, as > a means to to a self-diagnostic on these information technologies to the > point for instance of heart surgery for the definite expectancy of the > extended model could be stimulated for which errors in the progression > ofthese time-frames could be proven QCD. As this implies, a means for those > affected (including myself), (maybe only myself), to recover in the sense of > love that we have physiologically to develop in generations using the > stencils for a measure of paragrams in pollution or pragraphs to the > essential implementation of these existences that such criminality is > eventually an eventuality that a confession be heard and that the psyche of > these individual's is no longer driven to perform these acts of colluding > complext-ime for real-time to subsequently re-write history. The same for > which the actual nanites by the corresponding progression, to fix the faulty > Pentium, would be filtered accordingly (from the psyche that such > aritificial intelligence), as has affected to the point of obvious brain > damage that any one of these has been clearly spoiled to the despot of > lunacy, except to develop this progression. > > It's pretty bad when one can't even remember the golden rule and drives > another to the point that they couldn't either remember their own work, > history, or words as to the development otherwise that such ideas are so > suppressed, you'd wholly expect to find otherwise elsewhere between these > two points, I digress. > > This practive of bait and tackle cannot succeed, either, to rough and tumble > the extreme prejudice to indifference that the first holds the latter to > prove by interjection until the original message is no longer intelligible > for the same meaning as ever put into words that none shall ever be able to > comrpomise since there's been no negotation otherwise. I'm sorry if that > rhymed a little too hard for your especial little hearts. Something of a > game like telephone tag, but this project would preserve the QOI FYI. > > In other words, I'm trying to a check for self-identification as to what > crimes as those who have nothing to do with this, except better yet again as > the sense of capitalism becomes again apparent that such itself is a crime > or what implications as thus universally transformed are the same, for > immediate processing against all such threats proffered on my name or in the > expected immediacy of a rationale that as inhuman to the infusion of > aritifical intelligence to their conscious being, has no longer the influx > to the actions of any personage as for what aspects of its commission are > better certified to developm achine intelligence on the usenet and let it be > programmed to the internal assembly of noble gasses (which this > self-diagnostic is for), a custom assemblage of a development hierarchy. > All by which one is so degraded, depopularized, discredited since being > dehumanized that all you suckers seem to hop on the band-wagon about--to the > same effect as past violations of civil rights even. I'm glad we live in > this era though. Have some dignity before jumping the barrel with you > depressing responses. > > All I asked was what a good free assembler was. It's pretty bad when the > internet in the state that I get it, is so ephermeral esp. malware, > malevolent responses, and exploitative practices by which such links are > set. So please save your criticism for a different domain. Obviously > you've never been weaned off oil or coal. Nonetheless. > > Peace be upon you, > > Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" > Cyberneticist > http://www.usag-ac.info > > <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:vfSdnZA_HaZEqmLa4p2dnAA@giganews.com... > > > > > > Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: > > > >>I'm aiming to do a self-diagnostic method for a model dialogue range on > >>optional domains for unified plural clauses by Intel x86 assembly for a > >>task-independent systemology or basic routines for conference calling. > >>What > >>is a good assembler that is freely bound to domain specific routes for > >>metaphorical expansions of the huge model memory intrinsics ie. no docs > >>needed, as for which the SALT model [Fredkin] could be re-iterated? > >> > >>I'd be as well looking for any self-diagnostic code, macros, or sample > >>the same by the 80186 to first generation Pentium known for floating > >>point malfunctionality ie. embedded multi-tasking for portable > >>synchronization for ZV video simulations involving a nano-bud > >>structure for a robust recovery routine. > >> > >>PQ, > >> > >>Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" > >>Cyberneticist > >>http://www.usag-ac.info > > > > It's a spoof. He is doing Star Trek role playing. Poorly. > > > > | > > |From: Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" (pmeuser@cogeco.ca) > > |Date: 27.01.2007 06:00 > > |Message-ID: <w%Auh.18166$Ah.3625@read2.cgocable.net> > > |Newsgroup: alt.startrek.role-playing > > | > > |Hi all out/in there in cyberspace; I've decided to set my roots here in > > |twenty-first century Earth and > > |have started a new web-site. Against my > > |superlative judgement, I've decided to disclose the site, > > |http://www.usag-ac.info for public opinion, advice, and pointers, having > > |resigned from Starfleet Intelligence after my latest mission. It seems > > |that there are a few kind souls out there who have attempted to break > > down > > |my vernacular, setting me in the right direction and so forth here and > > now > > |on Earth in answering all the what-ifs star-fleet > > |has seemed to come up with about this alternate time-line. If you're > > |into technology and cyberspace, this site is for you.... > > | > >
Reply by Patrick Meuser-Bianca April 11, 20082008-04-11
I am sure that by the work that I've been seeking to accompish can be 
unified however the respit to what measure of confiscation and losses to the 
intent that these types of replies reflect.  I've been entered into this, 
situation, where noone is able to make sense of what I say, or has been 
somehow influenced as to detract from its meaning.  So that the powers that 
be can enter their own little time-frame to the essence of these recoveries 
for data that has either been transmuted or deleted from my computer, the 
situation is as well described to the inflitration of my true association by 
the expectation that Intel would actually surmount to develop their own 
80888, a RISC chip for what this such an effort as this, parallels in 
register independence as I've known since about 1988.  However latent within 
the twenty year time-frame that the ZV video port had been established for 
the more agile of these chip-sets to be non-exist in this cyber-space you 
suggest since.  It's by which the problems I've realized could as well be a 
role-playing game to establish a following in some degree or order of the 
same for physical existence, not just logical or virtual even as to the 
nature of this datum or how even has it meed modified to be completely 
different either way.  The diction of fiction is that which it is either 
ordered or not doesn't extend the full spectrum to this game of musical 
chairs either, should these suspiciouns smoe how 'meet up' with the mind for 
decorum exists in which constructive communication is known.

And I refuse to let you imply that I am ordering something based on a 
completely different forum, where the discussion is even prevented on 
sci.physics.relativity or sci.physics.discrete as to the nature of this 
goal.  So you can go till blue in the face that an adaptive-predicitive 
algorithgm for the generation of notes a-f has a g that implies the expasion 
of a symbology for instance that would prove the modula by the face of the 
moon, and the development of these degrees of misinformation and 
disinformation for which the music has actually superposed to the same 
effect of a mindscape or likewise to explore your interest in Star Trek 
wither with or witho out me.  As to whom these characters are, I don't 
expect the hyper-mechanical relationship of my theory of gravim 
(electromagnetism and gravity) to ever change, so nor would I exchange how 
these people have been spoofing me esp. through tele-marketing, to ever 
change as to the degree of such information as has been modified to the 
sheer number of you detractors as to the actual pivots to those who will 
face justice for their charges.

Why I've received messages to my own e-mail from myself prior and if you are 
if you are implying this I wouldn't do in the future, then I am no more 
complicit to a devil's advocate than I would be the devil himself to suggest 
life as such to send them.  Or introduce a sitution where anyone or anybody 
could be more or less confused in order to play a role.

Anyways as for what this message means, for you little wanna be demons, here 
goes.  Simulate a faulty Pentium with the ZV irregardless the order of 
political psychology for what main-stream media could be processed with the 
embedded design of a 80186 (as an embedded logic) in order to show and prove 
the nano-bud relationship as they've been escaping justice, or otherwise, as 
a means to to a self-diagnostic on these information technologies to the 
point for instance of heart surgery for the definite expectancy of the 
extended model could be stimulated for which errors in the progression 
ofthese time-frames could be proven QCD.  As this implies, a means for those 
affected (including myself), (maybe only myself), to recover in the sense of 
love that we have physiologically to develop in generations using the 
stencils for a measure of paragrams in pollution or pragraphs to the 
essential implementation of these existences that such criminality is 
eventually an eventuality that a confession be heard and that the psyche of 
these individual's is no longer driven to perform these acts of colluding 
complext-ime for real-time to subsequently re-write history.  The same for 
which the actual nanites by the corresponding progression, to fix the faulty 
Pentium, would be filtered accordingly (from the psyche that such 
aritificial intelligence), as has affected to the point of obvious brain 
damage that any one of these has been clearly spoiled to the despot of 
lunacy, except to develop this progression.

It's pretty bad when one can't even remember the golden rule and drives 
another to the point that they couldn't either remember their own work, 
history, or words as to the development otherwise that such ideas are so 
suppressed, you'd wholly expect to find otherwise elsewhere between these 
two points, I digress.

This practive of bait and tackle cannot succeed, either, to rough and tumble 
the extreme prejudice to indifference that the first holds the latter to 
prove by interjection until the original message is no longer intelligible 
for the same meaning as ever put into words that none shall ever be able to 
comrpomise since there's been no negotation otherwise.  I'm sorry if that 
rhymed a little too hard for your especial little hearts.  Something of a 
game like telephone tag, but this project would preserve the QOI FYI.

In other words, I'm trying to a check for self-identification as to what 
crimes as those who have nothing to do with this, except better yet again as 
the sense of capitalism becomes again apparent that such itself is a crime 
or what implications as thus universally transformed are the same, for 
immediate processing against all such threats proffered on my name or in the 
expected immediacy of a rationale that as inhuman to the infusion of 
aritifical intelligence to their conscious being, has no longer the influx 
to the actions of any personage as for what aspects of its commission are 
better certified to developm achine intelligence on the usenet and let it be 
programmed to the internal assembly of noble gasses (which this 
self-diagnostic is for), a custom assemblage of a development hierarchy. 
All by which one is so degraded, depopularized, discredited since being 
dehumanized that all you suckers seem to hop on the band-wagon about--to the 
same effect as past violations of civil rights even.  I'm glad we live in 
this era though.  Have some dignity before jumping the barrel with you 
depressing responses.

All I asked was what a good free assembler was.  It's pretty bad when the 
internet in the state that I get it, is so ephermeral esp. malware, 
malevolent responses, and exploitative practices by which such links are 
set.  So please save your criticism for a different domain.  Obviously 
you've never been weaned off oil or coal.  Nonetheless.

Peace be upon you,

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info

<me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
news:vfSdnZA_HaZEqmLa4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
> > > Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote: > >>I'm aiming to do a self-diagnostic method for a model dialogue range on >>optional domains for unified plural clauses by Intel x86 assembly for a >>task-independent systemology or basic routines for conference calling. >>What >>is a good assembler that is freely bound to domain specific routes for >>metaphorical expansions of the huge model memory intrinsics ie. no docs >>needed, as for which the SALT model [Fredkin] could be re-iterated? >> >>I'd be as well looking for any self-diagnostic code, macros, or sample >>the same by the 80186 to first generation Pentium known for floating >>point malfunctionality ie. embedded multi-tasking for portable >>synchronization for ZV video simulations involving a nano-bud >>structure for a robust recovery routine. >> >>PQ, >> >>Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" >>Cyberneticist >>http://www.usag-ac.info > > It's a spoof. He is doing Star Trek role playing. Poorly. > > | > |From: Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" (pmeuser@cogeco.ca) > |Date: 27.01.2007 06:00 > |Message-ID: <w%Auh.18166$Ah.3625@read2.cgocable.net> > |Newsgroup: alt.startrek.role-playing > | > |Hi all out/in there in cyberspace; I've decided to set my roots here in > |twenty-first century Earth and > |have started a new web-site. Against my > |superlative judgement, I've decided to disclose the site, > |http://www.usag-ac.info for public opinion, advice, and pointers, having > |resigned from Starfleet Intelligence after my latest mission. It seems > |that there are a few kind souls out there who have attempted to break > down > |my vernacular, setting me in the right direction and so forth here and > now > |on Earth in answering all the what-ifs star-fleet > |has seemed to come up with about this alternate time-line. If you're > |into technology and cyberspace, this site is for you.... > | >
Reply by April 11, 20082008-04-11

Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:

>I'm aiming to do a self-diagnostic method for a model dialogue range on >optional domains for unified plural clauses by Intel x86 assembly for a >task-independent systemology or basic routines for conference calling. What >is a good assembler that is freely bound to domain specific routes for >metaphorical expansions of the huge model memory intrinsics ie. no docs >needed, as for which the SALT model [Fredkin] could be re-iterated? > >I'd be as well looking for any self-diagnostic code, macros, or sample >the same by the 80186 to first generation Pentium known for floating >point malfunctionality ie. embedded multi-tasking for portable >synchronization for ZV video simulations involving a nano-bud >structure for a robust recovery routine. > >PQ, > >Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" >Cyberneticist >http://www.usag-ac.info
It's a spoof. He is doing Star Trek role playing. Poorly. | |From: Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca" (pmeuser@cogeco.ca) |Date: 27.01.2007 06:00 |Message-ID: <w%Auh.18166$Ah.3625@read2.cgocable.net> |Newsgroup: alt.startrek.role-playing | |Hi all out/in there in cyberspace; I've decided to set my roots here in |twenty-first century Earth and |have started a new web-site. Against my |superlative judgement, I've decided to disclose the site, |http://www.usag-ac.info for public opinion, advice, and pointers, having |resigned from Starfleet Intelligence after my latest mission. It seems |that there are a few kind souls out there who have attempted to break down |my vernacular, setting me in the right direction and so forth here and now |on Earth in answering all the what-ifs star-fleet |has seemed to come up with about this alternate time-line. If you're |into technology and cyberspace, this site is for you.... |