Stability or insanity
I've just spent over two weeks getting ready to do my next video. It was a combination of one of those vast underestimations one occasionally makes, combined with falling into a bit of an obsession.I am, at this point, not only wondering if...
Summary
Tim Wescott reflects on the thin line between pursuing stability and slipping into obsessive perfectionism after spending weeks preparing a video. The post distills practical lessons on timeboxing, scope control, and workflow choices that help embedded engineers deliver working firmware and demos without burning out.
Key Takeaways
- Break tasks and timebox work to prevent endless refinement from derailing schedules.
- Prototype and deliver incremental demos to validate ideas early and reduce late surprises.
- Automate repetitive build/test/deploy steps to limit manual toil and obsessive rework.
- Prioritize stability and clear finish criteria over last-minute polish to improve delivery predictability.
Who Should Read This
Mid-level embedded firmware engineers and technical creators who want to improve project scoping, time management, and practical workflows for demos and production work.
Still RelevantIntermediate
Related Documents
- Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing TimelessIntermediate
- PID Without a PhD TimelessIntermediate
- Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach Still RelevantIntermediate
- Can an RTOS be really real-time? TimelessAdvanced
- Memory Mapped I/O in C TimelessIntermediate









