|
Is 2.0 an upgrade to 1.2? Do I have to uninstall 1.2 before installing
2.0? Thanks, B.K. >>> 01/23/03 01:22PM >>> Hmm, seems that the web team is moving files around :-( Let me check. Erich > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Carryer [mailto:] > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 19:12 > To: > Subject: RE: [68HC12] Re: MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior) > Erich, > I first got an error on transfer now a file not found error while > trying to download the update. > > Is it still available? > > thanks > ed > -- > At 03:54 PM 1/23/2003 +0100, you wrote: > >ftp.metrowerks.com/pub/embedded/HC12/CW12_V2_0.exe > >But this is the full installation: 134MB > > > >Erich > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: varneybob <> [mailto:] > > > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 14:14 > > > To: > > > Subject: [68HC12] Re: MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior) > > > > > > > > > I've emailed Metrowerks but have not heard back yet. Is there any > > > way you can post all the necessary files somewhere? > > > > > > --- In , "zathra_70 <zathra_70@y...>" > > > <zathra_70@y...> wrote: > > > > varneybob, > > > > > > > > If you are still on the base V1.2 install, you need to upgrade a > > > bunch > > > > of files (headers, P&E driver, more) - contact metrowerks. > > > > I went through the same thing on an A series part. They just aren't > > > > supported in off the 1.2 CD install. > > > > > > > > -zathra_70 > > > > > > > > --- In , "varneybob <varneybob@y...>" > > > > <varneybob@y...> wrote: > > > > > I'm using CodeWarrior for HC(S)12. We've been using an eval > > > board > > > > > with the MC9S12DP256B MCU, but are actual MCU is the > > > MC9S12A256B. I > > > > > cannot get CodeWarrior to talk to the MCU via the P&E BDM > > > Multilink > > > > > cable. Also CodeWarrior, does not list the MC9S12A256B in a MCU- > > > ID > > > > > drop-down list (it _does_ list the MC9S12DP256B). > > > > > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! > > > > > > > > > -------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > >-------------------- > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > -------------------- ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -------------------- ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ************************************************************************* IMPORTANT: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this e-mail message that do not relate to the official business of Life Fitness shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ************************************************************************* |
|
|
MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior)
Started by ●January 22, 2003
Reply by ●January 24, 20032003-01-24
Reply by ●January 24, 20032003-01-24
|
It's not an upgrade, it is a full install. You do not need to uninstall 1.2 before installing 2.0. Anyway recommended to install it into a separate folder, just use the one propsed by the installer. Erich > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Kohan [mailto:] > Sent: Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 13:21 > To: > Subject: RE: [68HC12] Re: MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior) > Is 2.0 an upgrade to 1.2? Do I have to uninstall 1.2 before > installing 2.0? > > Thanks, > > B.K. > > >>> 01/23/03 01:22PM >>> > Hmm, seems that the web team is moving files around :-( > Let me check. > > Erich > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ed Carryer [mailto:] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 19:12 > > To: > > Subject: RE: [68HC12] Re: MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior) > > > > > > Erich, > > I first got an error on transfer now a file not found error while > > trying to download the update. > > > > Is it still available? > > > > thanks > > ed > > -- > > At 03:54 PM 1/23/2003 +0100, you wrote: > > >ftp.metrowerks.com/pub/embedded/HC12/CW12_V2_0.exe > > >But this is the full installation: 134MB > > > > > >Erich > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: varneybob <> [mailto:] > > > > Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 14:14 > > > > To: > > > > Subject: [68HC12] Re: MC9S12A256B vs MC9S12DP256B (and CodeWarrior) > > > > > > > > > > > > I've emailed Metrowerks but have not heard back yet. Is there any > > > > way you can post all the necessary files somewhere? > > > > > > > > --- In , "zathra_70 <zathra_70@y...>" > > > > <zathra_70@y...> wrote: > > > > > varneybob, > > > > > > > > > > If you are still on the base V1.2 install, you need to upgrade a > > > > bunch > > > > > of files (headers, P&E driver, more) - contact metrowerks. > > > > > I went through the same thing on an A series part. They > just aren't > > > > > supported in off the 1.2 CD install. > > > > > > > > > > -zathra_70 > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "varneybob <varneybob@y...>" > > > > > <varneybob@y...> wrote: > > > > > > I'm using CodeWarrior for HC(S)12. We've been using an eval > > > > board > > > > > > with the MC9S12DP256B MCU, but are actual MCU is the > > > > MC9S12A256B. I > > > > > > cannot get CodeWarrior to talk to the MCU via the P&E BDM > > > > Multilink > > > > > > cable. Also CodeWarrior, does not list the MC9S12A256B > in a MCU- > > > > ID > > > > > > drop-down list (it _does_ list the MC9S12DP256B). > > > > > > > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-------------------- > > > > > > > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > -------------------- ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -------------------- ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ************************************************************************* IMPORTANT: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information contained in this e-mail message that do not relate to the official business of Life Fitness shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ************************************************************************* -------------------- ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
