> > whenever there was a hacking run in the script - on GSM voice, > > Morse might be be the best! >Lewin A.R.W. Edwards wrote:> Actually, maybe speech synthesis and recognition would be the best! >I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice mails. Do you know of any published studies ? Perhaps I should google: "speech synthesis"+ "bandwidth" ? == Chris Glur.
Re: 300baud FSK over GSM
Started by ●January 15, 2005
Reply by ●January 15, 20052005-01-15
>I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed >transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice >mails.There used to be services that would read your email over the phone (synthesized). Hmm.
Reply by ●January 15, 20052005-01-15
<larwe@larwe.com> wrote:> >I too was wondering how band-width economical speech synthesed > >transmission is - not necessarily for real time. Just to forward voice > >mails. > > There used to be services that would read your email over the phone > (synthesized). Hmm.They still exist. -- David Horne- www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk