MOC5007 Optocoupler drop-in replacement

Hi

We're using the MOC5007 opto-coupler for isolation in an RS485
circuit.  Does anyone know of a drop-in replacement for this with
slightly better performance?

The pinouts are shown halfway down this page

http://www.datasheetdir.com/MOC5007+Optocouplers

TIA

In article <5b554a3f-8081-4ae3-bd7c-
567ea2b6f66f@q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, shane.2471958@gmail.com 
says...
> 
> Hi
> 
> We're using the MOC5007 opto-coupler for isolation in an RS485
> circuit.  Does anyone know of a drop-in replacement for this with
> slightly better performance?
> 
> The pinouts are shown halfway down this page
> 
> http://www.datasheetdir.com/MOC5007+Optocouplers
> 
> TIA


From what I know about what is going on in the optocoupler arena it is 
unlikely that you'll find a higher performance version of a part 
to replace the MOC5007 in the same package. I suspect that you
are looking at a board spin or need to build a small adapter board
to fit up some other part in place of the existing part. 

You may want to look at these parts from Vishay...
http://www.vishay.com/docs/84732/6n137vo2.pdf

Mouser carries some models:
http://www.mouser.com/Search/Refine.aspx?Keyword=782-6N137



-- 

Michael Karas
Carousel Design Solutions
http://www.carousel-design.com

On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:07:47 -0700 (PDT), Shane williams
<shane.2471958@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi
>
>We're using the MOC5007 opto-coupler for isolation in an RS485
>circuit.  Does anyone know of a drop-in replacement for this with
>slightly better performance?
>
>The pinouts are shown halfway down this page
>
>http://www.datasheetdir.com/MOC5007+Optocouplers

That does seem to be unobtanium, eh? Try the H11L1, also from Fairchild.
From a quick comparison it looks like a fit.

-- 
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA

In article <545uo69lei8oh5l5pu6gneogh7pq1opio0@4ax.com>, 
bbew.ar@mapson.nozirev.ten says...
> 
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:07:47 -0700 (PDT), Shane williams
> <shane.2471958@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >Hi
> >
> >We're using the MOC5007 opto-coupler for isolation in an RS485
> >circuit.  Does anyone know of a drop-in replacement for this with
> >slightly better performance?
> >
> >The pinouts are shown halfway down this page
> >
> >http://www.datasheetdir.com/MOC5007+Optocouplers
> 
> That does seem to be unobtanium, eh? Try the H11L1, also from Fairchild.
> From a quick comparison it looks like a fit.


The H11L1 does look like a pin compatible replacement 
but is hardly speced at higher performance then the 
MOC5007.

Fairchild:
http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/H1/H11L1-M.pdf

-- 

Michael Karas
Carousel Design Solutions
http://www.carousel-design.com

On Mar 27, 11:58=A0pm, Michael Karas <mka...@carousel-design.com> wrote:
> In article <545uo69lei8oh5l5pu6gneogh7pq1op...@4ax.com>,
> bbew...@mapson.nozirev.ten says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:07:47 -0700 (PDT), Shane williams
> > <shane.2471...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Hi
>
> > >We're using the MOC5007 opto-coupler for isolation in an RS485
> > >circuit. =A0Does anyone know of a drop-in replacement for this with
> > >slightly better performance?
>
> > >The pinouts are shown halfway down this page
>
> > >http://www.datasheetdir.com/MOC5007+Optocouplers
>
> > That does seem to be unobtanium, eh? Try the H11L1, also from Fairchild=
.
> > From a quick comparison it looks like a fit.
>
> The H11L1 does look like a pin compatible replacement
> but is hardly speced at higher performance then the
> MOC5007.
>
> Fairchild:http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/H1/H11L1-M.pdf
>
> --
>
> Michael Karas
> Carousel Design Solutionshttp://www.carousel-design.com

Thanks for those links.  The H11N1M looks pin compatible and faster at
5Mhz.

>Thanks for those links.  The H11N1M looks pin compatible and faster at
>5Mhz.

Beware of the inverted output in comparison to H11L1 !!!