Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:> The above are all available as single-chip solutions (on-chip SRAM and > flash). If you want to use external flash and SDRAM (e.g. to run > Linux), then I'd go with: > > * ARM9 or Cortex-A (Atmel, TI, Motorla, etc.)If you just need the memory, at least ST, TI and Fujitsu have Cortex-M3s with external memory buses and built-in SDRAM/flash memory controllers. -a
WAS:anybody know a good C compiler....
Started by ●August 16, 2012
Reply by ●August 24, 20122012-08-24
Reply by ●August 24, 20122012-08-24
On Friday, August 24, 2012 11:25:40 AM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:> Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > The above are all available as single-chip solutions (on-chip SRAM and > > > flash). If you want to use external flash and SDRAM (e.g. to run > > > Linux), then I'd go with: > > > > > > * ARM9 or Cortex-A (Atmel, TI, Motorla, etc.) > > > > If you just need the memory, at least ST, TI and Fujitsu have Cortex-M3s > > with external memory buses and built-in SDRAM/flash memory controllers.Also NXP.
Reply by ●August 25, 20122012-08-25
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:35:16 -0500, Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> wrote:>... [65816/65802] also postdated the 8080/Z80/6800/6502 (which were >variously introduced in 1974-1976) by a decade (the 65816 first >shipped in 1984). Nor was it particularly successful, certainly not >by comparison to the above four devices, or the more contemporary 68K >and 8086 families.That's true, but the 6502 was popular. The 65802 was pin compatible but much nicer to work with if the code needed 16-bit operations in any significant number. George