EmbeddedRelated.com
Forums
The 2026 Embedded Online Conference

Can you turn off Pipeline in ARM Cortex M3

Started by Klaus Kragelund September 8, 2015
On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
> [uS is what I would > have written, how am I supposed to do that now? "us" is more ambiguous? > Tom?]
:( Prepend a number :) More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. I wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered it correctly. Let's try "μ" which is simply a "special character" inserted into an OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which I'm composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted into a linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's cause for hope. If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become a major nitpicker with those that don't!
On 09/09/15 22:30, Tom Gardner wrote:
> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >> [uS is what I would >> have written, how am I supposed to do that now? "us" is more ambiguous? >> Tom?] > > :( > > Prepend a number :) > > More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. > I wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered > it correctly. > > Let's try "μ" which is simply a "special character" inserted into > an OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which > I'm composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted > into a linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's > cause for hope. > > If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become > a major nitpicker with those that don't!
Well, it has apparently worked from my PoV. Has it worked for you? Do you see it as U+03BC or something?
On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:32:38 +0100, Tom Gardner wrote:

> On 09/09/15 22:30, Tom Gardner wrote: >> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >>> [uS is what I would have written, how am I supposed to do that now? >>> "us" is more ambiguous? >>> Tom?] >> >> :( >> >> Prepend a number :) >> >> More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. I >> wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered it >> correctly. >> >> Let's try "μ" which is simply a "special character" inserted into an >> OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which I'm >> composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted into a >> linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's cause >> for hope. >> >> If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become a >> major nitpicker with those that don't! > > Well, it has apparently worked from my PoV. > Has it worked for you? > Do you see it as U+03BC or something?
It worked for me. I'll stick with 'us'. You could use 'mms'. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
On 09/09/15 23:32, Tim Wescott wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:32:38 +0100, Tom Gardner wrote: > >> On 09/09/15 22:30, Tom Gardner wrote: >>> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >>>> [uS is what I would have written, how am I supposed to do that now? >>>> "us" is more ambiguous? >>>> Tom?] >>> >>> :( >>> >>> Prepend a number :) >>> >>> More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. I >>> wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered it >>> correctly. >>> >>> Let's try "μ" which is simply a "special character" inserted into an >>> OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which I'm >>> composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted into a >>> linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's cause >>> for hope. >>> >>> If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become a >>> major nitpicker with those that don't! >> >> Well, it has apparently worked from my PoV. >> Has it worked for you? >> Do you see it as U+03BC or something? > > It worked for me. > > I'll stick with 'us'. > > You could use 'mms'.
Oh, I'd forgotten about that one! But "us" works in most cases.
On 9/9/2015 9:24 AM, John Devereux wrote:
> Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> writes: > >> On 09.9.2015 &#1075;. 12:18, Tom Gardner wrote: >>> On 08/09/15 21:51, Klaus Kragelund wrote: >>>> Disabling the pipeline would make the code more determistic >>> >>> Not significantly. >>> >>> Even with i486s, with their tiny caches, the ratio between >>> mean and worst case (IIRC) interrupt latencies could be 10:1 >>> (from memory 70us vs 700us). >> >> Hmmm, these are huge figures, even the 70uS is too huge I suppose. >> A 1 MHz 6800 had IRQ latency in the range of 30uS or so. > > We are talking about a CM3, that has sub-microsecond latency (12 cycles > from memory).
Only if the interrupt is enabled. Depending on what the code is doing it can be a lot longer. That is the real concern in an ISR. -- Rick
On 9/9/2015 6:32 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:32:38 +0100, Tom Gardner wrote: > >> On 09/09/15 22:30, Tom Gardner wrote: >>> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >>>> [uS is what I would have written, how am I supposed to do that now? >>>> "us" is more ambiguous? >>>> Tom?] >>> >>> :( >>> >>> Prepend a number :) >>> >>> More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. I >>> wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered it >>> correctly. >>> >>> Let's try "&mu;" which is simply a "special character" inserted into an >>> OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which I'm >>> composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted into a >>> linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's cause >>> for hope. >>> >>> If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become a >>> major nitpicker with those that don't! >> >> Well, it has apparently worked from my PoV. >> Has it worked for you? >> Do you see it as U+03BC or something? > > It worked for me. > > I'll stick with 'us'. > > You could use 'mms'.
Going back to my old days when caps were measured in mmf, mms would be a picosecond. -- Rick
On 10.9.2015 &#1075;. 00:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
> On 09/09/15 22:30, Tom Gardner wrote: >> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >>> [uS is what I would >>> have written, how am I supposed to do that now? "us" is more ambiguous? >>> Tom?] >> >> :( >> >> Prepend a number :) >> >> More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. >> I wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered >> it correctly. >> >> Let's try "&mu;" which is simply a "special character" inserted into >> an OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which >> I'm composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted >> into a linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's >> cause for hope. >> >> If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become >> a major nitpicker with those that don't! > > Well, it has apparently worked from my PoV. > Has it worked for you? > Do you see it as U+03BC or something?
It worked for me, too. And I have the character available in my editors (text and graphics) under dps but not via a single key; I have used it earlier but I think lately I just use "u". I suppose I can get used to "us" instead of "uS", but may be an option would be se-6 or sE-6... I still can't quite swallow the thought that S is invalid for seconds. I looked at my very old tek 465B, well, its front panel is also designated with lower case around the timebase knob. Dimiter
On 09/09/15 23:30, Tom Gardner wrote:
> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >> [uS is what I would >> have written, how am I supposed to do that now? "us" is more ambiguous? >> Tom?] > > :( > > Prepend a number :) > > More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. > I wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered > it correctly. > > Let's try "&mu;" which is simply a "special character" inserted into > an OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which > I'm composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted > into a linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's > cause for hope. > > If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become > a major nitpicker with those that don't!
&micro;s works fine for me. As long as readers have a reasonably modern newsreader, there should be no problem with the letter "mu" for micro - it is a standard character in the standard fonts on most systems. If someone has customised their desktop or newsreader to use a weird font with a more limited character range, then it might show up oddly. If there are any fans of command-line newsreaders, they should also see it if they have a utf-8 locale on their systems. As for typing it, that depends on your system and your keyboard. Windows is (as always) more limited. It should be easy for most non-English keyboard layouts, which separate the "Alt" and the "Alt Gr" keys - on my Norwegian keyboard layout, it's just AltGr-m. But if that doesn't work, character map is probably the least inconvenient method unless you can remember the Alt + numeric keyboard sequence. For Linux, you have other options. Again, depending on the keyboard layout, AltGr-m is likely to work - certainly on my Norwegian layout I can get a wide range of characters with combinations of AltGr, shift, and different keys. Then there is also the "compose" key - typically, this is not assigned by default, but you can set it up if you want it (I use the "scroll lock" key as compose). Then &micro; is compose + m + u.
On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:32:50 -0500
Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:32:38 +0100, Tom Gardner wrote: > > >> Let's try "&mu;" which is simply a "special character" > > It worked for me. > > I'll stick with 'us'. > > You could use 'mms'. >
Or going deviant bigtime, follow the Pharmaceutical industry and use 'MC' ? Jan Coombs -- email valid, else fix dots and hyphen jan4clf2014@murrayhyphenmicroftdotcodotuk
On 9/10/2015 3:05 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On 09/09/15 23:30, Tom Gardner wrote: >> On 09/09/15 21:56, Dimiter_Popoff wrote: >>> [uS is what I would >>> have written, how am I supposed to do that now? "us" is more ambiguous? >>> Tom?] >> >> :( >> >> Prepend a number :) >> >> More seriously I have seen a "micro" character in some usenet posts. >> I wonder how it got there, and whether other people's clients rendered >> it correctly. >> >> Let's try "&mu;" which is simply a "special character" inserted into >> an OpenOffice document then copied/pasted into this message, which >> I'm composing in SeaMonkey. Since it can also be copied/pasted >> into a linux/bash command line in the xfce terminal emulator, there's >> cause for hope. >> >> If it works I don't know whether I'll use it every time and become >> a major nitpicker with those that don't! > > &micro;s works fine for me. As long as readers have a reasonably modern > newsreader, there should be no problem with the letter "mu" for micro - > it is a standard character in the standard fonts on most systems. If > someone has customised their desktop or newsreader to use a weird font > with a more limited character range, then it might show up oddly. If > there are any fans of command-line newsreaders, they should also see it > if they have a utf-8 locale on their systems. > > As for typing it, that depends on your system and your keyboard. > Windows is (as always) more limited. It should be easy for most > non-English keyboard layouts, which separate the "Alt" and the "Alt Gr" > keys - on my Norwegian keyboard layout, it's just AltGr-m. But if that > doesn't work, character map is probably the least inconvenient method > unless you can remember the Alt + numeric keyboard sequence. > > For Linux, you have other options. Again, depending on the keyboard > layout, AltGr-m is likely to work - certainly on my Norwegian layout I > can get a wide range of characters with combinations of AltGr, shift, > and different keys. Then there is also the "compose" key - typically, > this is not assigned by default, but you can set it up if you want it (I > use the "scroll lock" key as compose). Then &micro; is compose + m + u.
Along with the often used &deg; - Alt-0176 &plusmn; - Alt-0177 mu is &micro; - Alt-0181 The zero is very important. Without it you get other chars. -- Rick
The 2026 Embedded Online Conference