responding to http://www.electrondepot.com/embedded/codewright-error-124860-.htm , Nick wrote:> clubley wrote: > > > > > > And those are precisely the reasons why you should _not_ try to do > this > > yourself. I might go as far as to advise that _nobody_ should > change > > anything in this running system. Making chances to an old beast > like > > that should never be done on the live installation. Without a test > rig, > > modifications to such an old beast are virtually guaranteed to > fail. Badly. > > > > And while at it, brace yourself (and the bosses) for the possible > > outcome that this system is found so out-of-date that it can no > longer > > usefully be maintained. This horse may be dead enough that you > should > > stop riding it. > > One thing I have not seen anyone ask yet: If this is a critical > production environment, then where are the archived copies of the > versions of the software and documentation used to create it ?Hi I have files with original environment from the last system programming. So, is something will gone wrong, i will have to reload this. As i mentioned before, i have "only" to modify some labels from the some inputs from the systems. I mean "only" because i thought this seems to easy when you have original programming files.> > Was the configuration of the original development environment archived > as well ?YES, original configuration still existing. *_The good news is that will be possible to get from an old installation a panel that is not use anymore and i will have possibility to create a test environmen*t_> > If the original designers didn't archive the original environment, then > how does the OP know that his instructions fully cover recreating the > original environment from scratch ?Not the case. Original files existing.> > To the OP: this sounds negative, but it's designed to make you think > and stop you from making a _really_ big mistake. > > BTW, also to the OP, what happens when this hardware fails ? There's > a strong argument to be made that you are effectively in that situation > at the moment as it clearly doesn't meet current requirements and you > don't appear to be able to change the setup so that it does.If the hardware failed, i will have to replace this with new generation equipments that have user friendly -dedicated software interface that i am fully certified to program and i already commissioned more then 20 big systems buildings already :) Customer will have to cover all cost for replacement for replacement. Customer already know this problem with his 20 years old panels :) sooner or later customer will have to migrate to new hardware system, but until then i want to help him to use this old system Regards Nick> > Simon. > > -- > Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP > Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world >--
Re: CodeWright Error
Started by ●October 4, 2015







