There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used ones. In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, which currently are: * OSA * atomthreads * ChibiOS * ScmRTOS But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation. Philipp
RTOS popularity
Started by ●December 26, 2015
Reply by ●December 26, 20152015-12-26
On 26.12.2015 19:54, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:> There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used ones. > In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, > which currently are: > > * OSA > * atomthreads > * ChibiOS > * ScmRTOS > > But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation. > > Philipp >Seems, there is also * BuguRTOS While I can't find the STM8 support in current ChibiOS anymore. Philipp
Reply by ●December 26, 20152015-12-26
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:54:40 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:> There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used ones. > In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, > which currently are: > > * OSA * atomthreads * ChibiOS * ScmRTOS > > But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation. > > PhilippFreeRTOS http://www.freertos.org -- Chisolm Republic of Texas
Reply by ●December 27, 20152015-12-27
On 27.12.2015 01:48, Joe Chisolm wrote:> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:54:40 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > >> There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used ones. >> In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, >> which currently are: >> >> * OSA * atomthreads * ChibiOS * ScmRTOS >> >> But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation. >> >> Philipp > > FreeRTOS > http://www.freertos.org >I see that people asked for a STM8 port a few times, and over ayear ago someone posted a port to the forum: http://interactive.freertos.org/entries/40887409-FreeRTOS-port-for-STM8-micro-controller-and-IAR-compiler But there has been no activity otherwise. While FreeRTOS is certainly popular in general, it seems not so much for STM8. Philipp
Reply by ●December 30, 20152015-12-30
On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: |-------------| |"[. . .] | |[. . .] STM8,| |[. . .] | | | |[. . .]" | |-------------| I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. Regards, Paul Colin Gloster P.S. If I had time etc. I would play your Blockade (Snake) clone: HTTP://SPTH.De Thanks for making it available.
Reply by ●December 30, 20152015-12-30
On 12/30/2015 1:20 PM, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester wrote:> On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: > |-------------| > |"[. . .] | > |[. . .] STM8,| > |[. . .] | > | | > |[. . .]" | > |-------------| > > > I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via > e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic > Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality > Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. > > Regards, > Paul Colin GlosterIs there some BS here? I searched for this document and found it has nothing to do with STM. What's your game? Are you just trying to increase sales of your paper? -- Rick
Reply by ●December 30, 20152015-12-30
On December 30th, 2015, Rickman sent: |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"On 12/30/2015 1:20 PM, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester wrote: | |> On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: | |> |-------------| | |> |"[. . .] | | |> |[. . .] STM8,| | |> |[. . .] | | |> | | | |> |[. . .]" | | |> |-------------| | |> | |> | |> I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via | |> e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic| |> Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality | |> Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. | |> | |> Regards, | |> Paul Colin Gloster | | | |Is there some BS here?" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| No. There is BS in publications which STMicroelectronics contributed to which I referred to in "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic Publications". |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"I searched for this document and found it has nothing to | |do with STM." | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| Thou art mistaken. Cf. WWW.FPGA-FAQ.com/archives/130600.html#130610 |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"What's your game?" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| Whistleblowing, but it is not a game. |---------------------------------------------------------------------| |"Are you just trying to increase sales of your | |paper? | | | |-- | | | |Rick" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| It is not my paper - it is a paper by me owned by a publisher. More visibility might not hurt. A lot of persons are subscribers and would not need to buy a copy of this paper. Thy sincerely, Paul Colin Gloster
Reply by ●December 30, 20152015-12-30
On 12/30/2015 2:10 PM, Paul Colin Gloster wrote:> On December 30th, 2015, Rickman sent: > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"On 12/30/2015 1:20 PM, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester wrote: | > |> On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: | > |> |-------------| | > |> |"[. . .] | | > |> |[. . .] STM8,| | > |> |[. . .] | | > |> | | | > |> |[. . .]" | | > |> |-------------| | > |> | > |> | > |> I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via | > |> e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic| > |> Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality | > |> Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. | > |> | > |> Regards, | > |> Paul Colin Gloster | > | | > |Is there some BS here?" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > No. There is BS in publications which STMicroelectronics contributed > to which I referred to in "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in > Computer and Electronic Publications". > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"I searched for this document and found it has nothing to | > |do with STM." | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Thou art mistaken. Cf. > WWW.FPGA-FAQ.com/archives/130600.html#130610 > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"What's your game?" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Whistleblowing, but it is not a game. > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"Are you just trying to increase sales of your | > |paper? | > | | > |-- | > | | > |Rick" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > It is not my paper - it is a paper by me owned by a publisher. More > visibility might not hurt. A lot of persons are subscribers and would > not need to buy a copy of this paper. > > Thy sincerely, > Paul Colin GlosterSo you are "whistle-blowing" on buggy code? -- Rick
Reply by ●December 31, 20152015-12-31
Paul Colin Gloster wrote:> On December 30th, 2015, Rickman sent: > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"On 12/30/2015 1:20 PM, Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester wrote: | > |> On 26th December 2015, Philipp Colin Krause sent: | > |> |-------------| | > |> |"[. . .] | | > |> |[. . .] STM8,| | > |> |[. . .] | | > |> | | | > |> |[. . .]" | | > |> |-------------| | > |> | > |> | > |> I advise against STMicroelectronics, as I documented via | > |> e.g. "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic| > |> Publications", "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality | > |> Assurance", Volume 20, Issue 3. | > |> | > |> Regards, | > |> Paul Colin Gloster | > | | > |Is there some BS here?" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > No. There is BS in publications which STMicroelectronics contributed > to which I referred to in "Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in > Computer and Electronic Publications". > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"I searched for this document and found it has nothing to | > |do with STM." | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Thou art mistaken. Cf. > WWW.FPGA-FAQ.com/archives/130600.html#130610* Sits "forever" trying to load...> > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"What's your game?" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Whistleblowing, but it is not a game. > > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > |"Are you just trying to increase sales of your | > |paper? | > | | > |-- | > | | > |Rick" | > |---------------------------------------------------------------------| > > It is not my paper - it is a paper by me owned by a publisher. More > visibility might not hurt. A lot of persons are subscribers and would > not need to buy a copy of this paper. > > Thy sincerely, > Paul Colin Gloster
Reply by ●December 31, 20152015-12-31
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 09:16:11 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:> On 27.12.2015 01:48, Joe Chisolm wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:54:40 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >> >>> There are a lot of RTOSes around. I wonder which are the most used >>> ones. >>> In particular, I'm interested in the free ones supporting the STM8, >>> which currently are: >>> >>> * OSA * atomthreads * ChibiOS * ScmRTOS >>> >>> But I'd also like to know about the general 8/16-bit situation. >>> >>> Philipp >> >> FreeRTOS http://www.freertos.org >> >> > I see that people asked for a STM8 port a few times, and over ayear ago > someone posted a port to the forum: > http://interactive.freertos.org/entries/40887409-FreeRTOS-port-for-STM8-micro-controller-and-IAR-compiler> But there has been no activity otherwise. While FreeRTOS is certainly > popular in general, it seems not so much for STM8. > > PhilippAre you locked into a 8 bit uC? Power, pin count, real estate issues? -- Chisolm Republic of Texas
