with expandable idea http://arm.web7days.com http://arm.web7days.com/faq.html
ARM7 board- the latest PCB design--customer attention
Started by ●January 3, 2004
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
EZarm wrote:> > with expandable idea > > http://arm.web7days.com > > http://arm.web7days.com/faq.htmlHey guy, give it a rest! This forum is not for advertising. You got your one free post, now go away like a good little boy.
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
"EZarm" <EZ@onearth.com> wrote> with expandable idea > > http://arm.web7days.com > http://arm.web7days.com/faq.htmlFrom the web site: "The importance issue of the board well work for days in testing." Which is quite remarkable considering the complete lack of decoupling on a 60 MHz processor. Not recommended. I prefer Leon Heller's design: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html Regards, Arie de Muynck
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
> > From the web site: "The importance issue of the board well work for daysin> testing." Which is quite remarkable considering the complete lack of > decoupling on a 60 MHz processor. >We apply TWO capacitors for the decoupling capacitors for the 3.3V supply, another capacitor decouples the 1.8V supply. They are closed to the supply and ground pins. The connections is made with wide tracks to minimise inductance. EZARM for web7days
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
EZarm wrote:>>From the web site: "The importance issue of the board well work for days > > in > >>testing." Which is quite remarkable considering the complete lack of >>decoupling on a 60 MHz processor. >> > > We apply TWO capacitors for the decoupling capacitors for the 3.3V supply, > another capacitor decouples > the 1.8V supply. They are closed to the supply and ground pins. > The connections is made with wide tracks to minimise inductance.By this statement I conclude besides a @#$%& spammer (BTW I hate spammers with all my guts - I'd hardly buy anything advertised this way) you know nothing about the matter and this "work for days in testing" is due much more to the processor's resilience than your design quality.
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
Elder Costa wrote:> > By this statement I conclude besides a @#$%& spammer (BTW I hate > spammers with all my guts - I'd hardly buy anything advertised this way)^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Isn't this why SPAMMERS keep SPAMMing ?? They know sooner or latter people will buy, so they keep SPAMMing. Their model works and they keep making money, so they keep SPAMMing. DOH !
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
MyLinux, After months of asking stupid questions...do you really think anyone is going to buy anything off you? You have well and truely proved to everyone that you don't know s%*t from clay. Maybe you could sell freshly squeezed orange juice on the side of the street? In fact no forget that idea...just go away... "EZarm" <EZ@onearth.com> wrote in message news:bt8roh$a0a3174@imsp212.netvigator.com...> > > > From the web site: "The importance issue of the board well work for days > in > > testing." Which is quite remarkable considering the complete lack of > > decoupling on a 60 MHz processor. > > > We apply TWO capacitors for the decoupling capacitors for the 3.3V supply, > another capacitor decouples > the 1.8V supply. They are closed to the supply and ground pins. > The connections is made with wide tracks to minimise inductance. > > EZARM for web7days > >