In article <k3XLOjCY3iBCFANj@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>, Chris Hills <chris@phaedsys.org> writes>In article <2cpNd.3223$wK.2376@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, Ed >Beroset <beroset@mindspring.com> writes >>Chris Hills wrote: >>> In article <3IydnX_7kJwOx5nfRVn-3A@rogers.com>, R Adsett <radsett@junk.a >>> eolusdevelopment.cm> writes >>> >>>>In article <mUz7GCBINBBCFA+k@phaedsys.demon.co.uk>, chris@phaedsys.org >>>>says... >>>> >>>>>8051 (any one of the 600+ varients from 30+ silicon vendors) There is no >>>>>peripheral that the 8051 family does not have. >>>> >>>>None? That's quite an assertion to leave out there naked Chris. :) I >>>>suspect there might be one or two not available on an 8051. >>>> >>>>Robert >>> >>> Yes... probably a risky statement. However, having set myself up: >>> Are there any peripherals the 8051 family does not have? >> >>IEEE-488 bus? (Yes, I'm being silly.) > >Silly maybe but a valid point for the fall I set my self up for :-)However IEE 488 on a 51 :-) http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~ssspr/proj/ongoing/fpgabarc.html http://www.cpu-world.com/Support/8051.html http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/013531948X/104-6017330-856 5536?v=glance http://www.cyber-spy.com/electronics-design/electro-01367-29917.html http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/96D2F7612B87FFC986256804 0068202C?opendocument&node=1267_US /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Developmet kit for embedded education
Started by ●February 4, 2005
Reply by ●February 7, 20052005-02-07
Reply by ●February 7, 20052005-02-07
nick13 <manoes1@yahoo.com> wrote:> What develoment kits would you would consider for senior undergrad and > graduate level embedded systems course? > It needs to be versatile and support several peripherals at reasonable > cost. It will also be used in senior projects and MS projects. > What C compiler you would recommend? > What RTOS ports exist for this platform? > How popular is this system? Any links?I would recommend that you check out www.picbook.com I happen to have taken a class by the author of the book, and it was quite excellent. The book even includes sample lab assignments. ttyl, --buddy
Reply by ●February 7, 20052005-02-07
Hi, I can assure you they do like it a lot! ARM related companies offer many devices for different target markets and yet, there are still SOOOO many more 51-designs which ARM would love to get hold of, once all these designs migrate. An Schwob CBarn24050 wrote:> >Subject: Re: Developmet kit for embedded education > >From: larwe@larwe.com > > >>or of course the "32 bit 8051" or ARM7 > > > The arm has nothing in common with the 8051. > > > > >Since I'm one of the authors who has published this comment, I feelthe> >need to defend it: The ARM7 core and the 8051 core have this incommon:> >ubiquity. The thrust of the "ARM7 is the 32-bit 8051" statement isthat> >ARM7 fills the same niche in the 32-bit space that 8051 fills in the > >8-bit space. > > How so? What niche do you think the 8051 fills? I doubt if the goodfolks at> Arm would like your comparison. Is the Arm as a standalone processorgoing to> be made by everyone and his brother like the 8051? Are Arm toolsgoing to be> freely available all over the net? If so then your statement mighthave some> merit.
Reply by ●February 17, 20052005-02-17
Nick, You may want to try some of the low-cost ARM based eval boards from LogicPD or Revely. They are based on Sharp MCU's and come with free GCC tools with plenty of RTOS ports available for them. learn more here: http://www.logicpd.com/eps/devkits/sharp/sdk/sharp_sdk/ http://www.revely.com I hope this helps! -Z